A congregation can make the gospel easier to hear by explaining unfamiliar words, speaking in the language its neighbors use, and answering the questions they actually ask. Those choices serve the people being taught. A different kind of change occurs when a church softens what Christ commands or reshapes worship around the pleasures it thinks will bring people through the door. The distinction becomes clear when a congregation must decide what to do with a teaching or practice that prospective visitors find unwelcome. Jesus prayed that His disciples would be kept from the wicked one and sanctified in the truth while they carried out their work in the world (John 17:14–18). Paul made himself a servant to people with very different backgrounds while remaining under the law toward Christ (1 Corinthians 9:19–23). Taken together, these passages give a congregation grounds for removing obstacles of its own making and for keeping the message and worship under Christ’s authority.

Sent Into the World and Set Apart by the Truth

Jesus prayed for disciples who had received the Father’s word and encountered the world’s hatred because they did not belong to it (John 17:14). He then asked the Father to keep them from the wicked one while they remained in the world (John 17:15). The distinction between being in the world and being of it is essential to the prayer. The disciples would live among people who had yet to believe, and Jesus sent them into that very setting (John 17:18). Their neighbors needed the testimony they carried, so withdrawal from contact with them would have frustrated the work Jesus gave them. Their presence among those neighbors was to be governed by their allegiance to the Father and the Son, even when that allegiance brought opposition.

Jesus asks the Father to sanctify His disciples in the truth and identifies that truth in the words “your word is truth” (John 17:17, UASV). The same word that drew opposition in John 17:14 was to govern the lives and work of the men He sent. That connection matters whenever a church discovers that people are willing to hear about Jesus provided certain parts of His teaching are left out. A teacher can explain repentance in ordinary language, show how it differs from regret, and answer a visitor who thinks it requires him to make himself worthy of forgiveness. Each of those choices helps the hearer understand what Scripture requires. A teacher who withholds the call to repentance because it could cost the church an audience has allowed the audience to decide what it will hear from Christ.

What Paul Gave Up to Reach His Hearers

Paul’s statement that he became all things to all men follows his discussion of an apostle’s right to material support (1 Corinthians 9:3–18, 22). He establishes that those who proclaim the gospel may receive their living from it, yet he explains that he chose to preach without making full use of that right. This is the concrete instance of voluntary restraint immediately preceding his description of making himself a slave to all (1 Corinthians 9:19). The cost of the adjustment fell on Paul. He was willing to surrender something he could legitimately claim so that the exercise of that right would place no obstacle in the way of the gospel (1 Corinthians 9:12). A congregation applying his reasoning might give up insider vocabulary that its members enjoy using when plain speech would help a visitor understand the same truth. Its willingness to make that change would show concern for the visitor’s understanding and leave the substance of the teaching intact.

Paul names Jews, those under the Law, those without the Law, and the weak as people whose circumstances affected how he approached them (1 Corinthians 9:20–22). His approach to those without the Law contains its own qualification. He remained accountable to God and described himself as under the law toward Christ (1 Corinthians 9:21). His flexibility therefore operated inside a defined allegiance. The following discussion gives that limit concrete form by forbidding participation in idolatrous worship while permitting a Christian to accept an unbeliever’s invitation to an ordinary meal, with attention to conscience if the food was identified as sacrificial (1 Corinthians 10:14–22, 27–29). The distinction mattered to people who shared meals and civic life with unbelieving neighbors. A Christian could accept hospitality while remaining responsible for what his conduct communicated about worship and loyalty.

Familiar Language and an Unchanged Message

Paul’s address in Athens shows adaptation in the act of speaking. He began with an altar his hearers could recognize and used it to address their ignorance about the God he proclaimed (Acts 17:22–23). He went on to explain that the Creator does not dwell in temples made by human hands and that the divine nature cannot be adequately represented by an image made from gold, silver, or stone (Acts 17:24–29). He then declared that God commands people everywhere to repent and has appointed a day of judgment, giving assurance by raising the appointed man from the dead (Acts 17:30–31). The altar gave Paul a point of contact with his audience, and his argument brought them to claims that challenged their existing worship. Some mocked when they heard of resurrection, others wanted to hear more, and some believed (Acts 17:32–34). The different responses came after the hearers had been given enough of the message to know what they were responding to.

The same distinction applies to the way a congregation receives people unfamiliar with the Bible. A speaker can explain why Paul calls Jesus the Christ, identify the passage being read, and give hearers a moment to find it before explaining its argument. That kind of accommodation helps people who have never learned the congregation’s habits or vocabulary. If the speaker then presents Jesus as a source of confidence while withholding His authority to command repentance and obedience, the change reaches the content of the message. Jesus commissioned His disciples to teach people to observe what He had commanded (Matthew 28:19–20). A visitor should therefore be able to discover from the congregation’s teaching what following Jesus requires, even when the answer differs from what first drew that visitor’s interest.

Christian Heavy Metal and the Words Being Sung

Christian heavy metal offers a concrete case for distinguishing musical preference from the responsibilities of a congregation. Consider a church invited to feature a band whose proposed set uses heavily amplified instruments, forceful rhythms, and harsh vocal delivery. The band’s Christian identification tells the church how the musicians describe their work, while the songs themselves supply the evidence about what they teach. Leaders can read each lyric in full and ask what it says about God, sin, Christ, and the response the song invites from its hearers. A song that depicts anger at injustice requires attention to what it commends the hearer to do with that anger. A lyric that celebrates personal revenge conflicts with Paul’s instruction to leave vengeance to God and overcome evil with good (Romans 12:17–21). Christian vocabulary in a chorus gives the congregation no grounds for overlooking what the verses teach.

Colossians 3:16 connects the singing of psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs with letting the word of Christ dwell richly among believers and with teaching and admonishing one another. That context gives a congregation a positive reason to examine the clarity and substance of the words it sings. A song can use biblical terms accurately on paper while its delivery in the room makes the main lines difficult to hear. Printed words can help people follow a song, but the leaders still need to see whether the arrangement enables the congregation to sing and attend to its meaning. In a proposed set, a refrain that the congregation can understand and sing serves a different function from verses that everyone must leave to the vocalist. If the music is being selected for congregational singing, its suitability has to be judged by what the people in the room can actually do with it.

Performance and the Place of the Congregation

A congregation also needs to consider what the performance asks of the people present. In discussing prayer and singing, Paul insists on the importance of understanding and considers whether another person can say the amen when he does not know what is being said (1 Corinthians 14:15–17). Later in the same chapter he directs that what is done in the assembly be done for building up (1 Corinthians 14:26). Those instructions arose in a discussion of speech and order in Corinth, and they make the effect on other worshipers relevant to decisions about a gathering. In the heavy metal example, leaders can listen from the room rather than judging from the platform alone, observe whether the instruments cover the words, and see whether ordinary members can take part. If the arrangement leaves them watching the musicians demonstrate their skill through nearly the entire set, the church has grounds to decline the set for a meeting devoted to congregational praise.

The same concern can arise with a choir, a soloist, or any other featured performer when a congregation makes the display of skill the center of its gathering. Competent musicians can serve other believers by choosing a pitch they can reach, keeping time clearly, and allowing the words and the voices of the congregation to be heard. In the heavy metal example, the leaders might also consider what the presentation conveys through stage gestures, projections, and interaction with the crowd. A projection that glorifies cruelty is a concern even if the words projected next to it refer to Christ. A stage manner that invites the crowd to celebrate defiance or to fix its attention on the performers needs to be judged alongside the lyrics. The congregation’s responsibility is to examine the whole presentation, because people receive the words in the setting and manner in which they are delivered.

The Difference Between a Music Event and a Worship Gathering

The same band might be proposed for a separately announced music event or for the congregation’s regular worship gathering. At a music event, listeners may reasonably expect to hear a performance, and the church should describe the event plainly if it chooses to host it. At a worship gathering, the congregation has assembled to honor God, hear His Word, pray, and encourage one another (Acts 2:42; Hebrews 10:24–25). Music selected for that gathering has to serve those purposes. An arrangement suitable for listening can still be unsuitable for a meeting in which the congregation is expected to sing together. A separate event remains subject to Christian standards of truth and conduct, and calling it an outreach gives the organizers a further reason to be clear about where and how people will hear the gospel.

The event’s purpose can often be seen in what the congregation advertises and what it protects when planning the program. Suppose the invitation emphasizes the intensity of the performance, the band receives most of the evening, and the speaker is asked to keep Christ’s claims brief so that visitors will stay. The church has then made the draw the governing feature of the event, and the message is being fitted into whatever space the performance leaves. An invitation that states what people will hear about Christ, with a program that gives time for that teaching and for questions, makes the intended encounter different. Paul’s concern was that people should hear the word concerning Christ, since faith comes from hearing that word (Romans 10:14–17). The size of the audience can tell a congregation how many people came, while the program itself shows whether those people were given a clear opportunity to understand the gospel.

What a Congregation Is Asking People to Come For

Jesus addressed a crowd whose search for Him was driven by the food they had received (John 6:26–27). He went on teaching even when some hearers found His words hard to accept and withdrew (John 6:60–66). Peter then identified what bound him to Jesus when he acknowledged that Jesus had words of eternal life (John 6:68). A congregation faces a related choice when leaders consider what visitors would lose if a featured performance were removed from the schedule. If the main reason for attending disappears with the performer and visitors still know little about Christ’s death, resurrection, and commands, the leaders can see what their program has taught people to expect. Giving time to the gospel, answering honest questions, and making room for the congregation to worship together give a visitor a clearer view of the people Jesus sends into the world and of the word by which they live.

You May Also Enjoy

Answering the Main Objections to Christianity

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS