Framing the Issue: Why Irrationalism and Rationalism Matter Now

The present conflict over knowledge is not a mere academic curiosity; it is a front-line battle over truth, meaning, authority, and the destiny of human beings created in the image of God. The two dominant errors are obvious and destructive. Irrationalism denies stable truth, collapses knowledge into subjectivity, and treats logic as a power game. Rationalism absolutizes human reason, elevates autonomous thought into the final court of appeal, and places the human mind over the Word of God. Both errors produce moral confusion, doctrinal evaporation, and intellectual despair. By contrast, Scripture authoritatively locates reason within its proper place under Divine revelation. Biblical Christianity does not flee from reason; it restores right reason. The issue is not whether the human mind should think but under Whose authority the mind must think. The apostolic answer is unequivocal: “We are destroying speculations and every lofty thing raised up against the knowledge of God, and we are taking every thought captive to the obedience of Christ” (2 Corinthians 10:5). That mandate is not hyperbole; it is an imperative for every discipline, every question, and every claim to knowledge.

Defining Terms Precisely: Reason, Rationalism, Irrationalism, Faith, and Knowledge

Precision in terms is non-negotiable. Reason is the God-given capacity to apprehend, infer, and judge in accord with the basic laws of thought: identity, non-contradiction, and excluded middle. These laws are not human inventions; they reflect the consistency of the God Who cannot deny Himself. Rationalism is the elevation of unaided human intellect as the ultimate standard for truth. It is the enthronement of autonomy. Irrationalism is the rejection of objective truth and logical norms, replacing them with feelings, power, or preference. Faith, according to Scripture, is not a leap into darkness; it is a warranted, obedient trust grounded in God’s truthful character and His revealed words and acts. Knowledge is true belief with adequate warrant, and the final warrant rests on the God Who “cannot lie” (Titus 1:2). The biblical worldview does not pit faith against evidence; it teaches that faith receives and rests upon God’s revelation and attends carefully to the evidences He provides in creation, in history, and above all in Scripture.

The Biblical Ground of Reason: Image, Command, and Accountability

Human rationality is anchored in creation. “Then God said, ‘Let Us make man in Our image, after Our likeness’” (Genesis 1:26). Being created in God’s image includes rational, moral, and volitional capacities. The Bible never instructs humans to suspend rational judgment; it demands renewed minds. “Come now, and let us reason together,” says Jehovah: “though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow” (Isaiah 1:18). “The fear of Jehovah is the beginning of knowledge; fools despise wisdom and instruction” (Proverbs 1:7). God’s commands to test, examine, and prove are universal mandates for the believer’s intellect. “Test all things; hold fast to what is good” (1 Thessalonians 5:21). The apostolic preaching in Acts is rational proclamation with persuasive argumentation. Paul “reasoned in the synagogue every Sabbath, and tried to persuade Jews and Greeks” (Acts 18:4). He did not entertain anti-intellectualism; he exposed error, argued from Scripture, appealed to eyewitnesses, and confronted falsehood.

Reason after the Fall: Clarity of Revelation and Corruption of Heart

The fall did not erase rational capacity; it corrupted moral posture. Humans suppress the truth in unrighteousness. “For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them” (Romans 1:19). The problem is not lack of evidence but rebellion against God’s clear revelation in creation and conscience. This suppression distorts reasoning processes. Scripture diagnoses the unbelieving mind as darkened, not because the intellect ceased functioning, but because the heart refuses to submit to God. The cure is not mystical inward voices; it is repentance and submission to the written Word that is “God-breathed” (2 Timothy 3:16). The Spirit does not indwell believers as an interior voice; He operates through the inspired Word, which is sufficient to teach, reprove, correct, and train in righteousness.

The Law of Non-Contradiction and the Character of God

The laws of thought are not negotiable cultural habits; they mirror God’s faithfulness and unity. Jehovah is not self-contradictory. “God is not a God of confusion but of peace” (1 Corinthians 14:33). When Scripture speaks, it does not affirm both P and not-P in the same sense at the same time. Christ’s teaching is consistently logical. When He answers the Sadducees, He exposes their ignorance of Scripture and the power of God by drawing a valid inference from Exodus 3:6. The Creator’s consistency grounds the reliability of inferential reasoning. To call contradiction “mystery” is to excuse error. True mystery is truth beyond creaturely comprehension, not nonsense. The Trinity is not a contradiction; it affirms one Being of God and three divine Persons without confusing being and person. The incarnation is not a contradiction; it affirms one Person, Jesus Christ, with two natures, divine and human, without mixing or dividing the natures.

Irrationalism: A Denial of Truth, Meaning, and Moral Accountability

Irrationalism manifests in ancient skepticism, romanticism, existential despair, and contemporary relativism. It proclaims that meaning is constructed, not discovered; that logic is a tool of power; that truth-claims are masks for domination. Such claims self-destruct. If meanings are only constructs, the claim “meanings are only constructs” has no binding force. If truth is a tool of power, the claim “truth is a tool of power” is a power move, not a truth. The assertion that “there is no objective truth” is itself offered as an objective truth. Scripture exposes this folly: “The fool says in his heart, ‘There is no God’” (Psalm 14:1). Folly is not a lack of IQ; it is moral rebellion that ruins rationality. The denial of stable truth annihilates science, law, and morality. One cannot do physics without the stability of the created order. One cannot do law without fixed meanings in words and covenants. One cannot do ethics without objective moral norms grounded in the unchanging character of God.

Rationalism: The Idolatry of Autonomous Mind

Rationalism, in its pride, sets the human mind up as judge over revelation. It approaches Scripture not as the Word of God but as a human product to be verified if possible and dismissed if not. That posture is self-defeating because it assumes what it needs to prove: that human reason is competent to sit in judgment over God. The biblical posture is the opposite. Reason functions ministerially, not magisterially. It receives God’s Word, analyzes its grammar and historical context, compares Scripture with Scripture, and applies sound inference; it does not authorize itself to annul what the Creator has said. Jesus did not submit Scripture to cultural tribunals. He said, “Scripture cannot be broken” (John 10:35). The apostles did not review the resurrection by committee; they bore authoritative witness to a public event in history, with names, places, and dates.

Creation, Order, and the Grounds of Scientific Inquiry

The Bible anchors the intelligibility of nature in God’s creative decree. “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth” (Genesis 1:1). The six “days” of creation are God-ordered periods of creative activity; the word day in Scripture denotes varying lengths by context. Scripture reports that the luminaries existed as part of “the heavens” when God created, and that from Earth’s surface their light became visible and then later clearly discernible as the atmosphere cleared. This account supplies the basis for expecting regularity in the cosmos. Uniformity is not a brute fact; it is the effect of a faithful Creator Who sustains all things by His powerful word. The Flood of 2348 B.C.E., a real, global judgment, explains catastrophic features in Earth’s geology and shows that God’s governance of nature includes judgment as well as providence. Scientific inquiry itself presupposes order, causality, mathematics, and the reliability of memory and senses—features that are not accidents but gifts from the Creator Who made humans to investigate His world.

Historicity Anchored by Literal Chronology: Scripture’s Timeline Is Coherent

Biblical events unfold in real space-time. Abraham’s covenant in 2091 B.C.E. established the nation through which Messiah would come. Jacob entered Egypt in 1876 B.C.E., and the Exodus occurred in 1446 B.C.E. Israel entered the land in 1406 B.C.E., and Solomon began the temple in 966 B.C.E. These are not legendary placeholders; they are fixed points in the history of redemption. In the fullness of time, John the Baptizer and Jesus were born about 2 B.C.E. Jesus began His ministry in 29 C.E. and was executed on Nisan 14, 33 C.E. The written witnesses belong early and within living memory. Matthew wrote first in Hebrew around 41 C.E. and then in Greek about 45 C.E. Mark wrote about 60–65 C.E., Luke about 56–58 C.E., Paul wrote Hebrews in Rome around 61 C.E., John completed his Gospel and letters in 98 C.E., and Revelation was given in 96 C.E. This timeline demonstrates that Christianity is anchored in public history, not esoteric speculation. Christianity invites verification because it is true.

Christ and the Apostles Practiced Rigor, Not Credulity

Christ’s method was relentlessly rational and textual. When challenged by the Pharisees on divorce, He answered by appealing to the plain historical grammar of Genesis: “Have you not read that He Who created them from the beginning made them male and female?” (Matthew 19:4). He faced the Sadducees’ denial of the resurrection by drawing an inference from God’s present-tense declaration, “I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob” (Matthew 22:32). If He is their God, they live to Him; therefore the resurrection is certain. Paul at Athens reasoned from creation to the accountability of all nations and finally to the certainty of judgment through the Man God has appointed, giving assurance by raising Him from the dead (Acts 17:24–31). The apostolic pattern is consistent: argument from Scripture, appeal to creation, historical testimony, and calls to repentance.

The Reliability of the Text: No Place for Skeptical Myths

The Hebrew Old Testament and the Greek New Testament critical texts are a 99.99% reflection of the words of the original writings. Variants are real and carefully cataloged, but they do not touch any doctrine. The preservation of Scripture is not a slogan but a documented fact confirmed by extensive manuscript evidence and ancient versions. Claims that the Bible is corrupted are empty. The God Who promised that His words will not pass away has preserved them in the stream of history. The task of the church is to translate accurately, to interpret by the historical-grammatical method, and to submit all doctrine to the exact wording of Scripture. No doctrine stands on a single difficult text; solid teaching rests on the cumulative testimony of passages rightly exegeted in context.

Faith and Evidence: The Biblical Pattern of Warranted Trust

Biblical faith is warranted trust in the true God on the basis of His character and acts. “Now faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen” (Hebrews 11:1). That is not a charter for irrational leaps; it is a description of certainty grounded in God’s fidelity. The chapter immediately catalogs instances where God’s people acted on evidence of His reliability. Abraham did not abandon reason when he left Ur; he obeyed the God Who spoke and Who had the right to command. Israel did not cross the sea on a whim; they followed the God Who had displayed power over Egypt in judgment. The New Testament calls people to believe on the grounds of eyewitness testimony to Christ’s death and resurrection. Thomas was not commended for unbelief; he was rebuked and then confronted with evidence: “Put your finger here, and see My hands” (John 20:27). Faith welcomes evidence because God provides it.

Miracles and the Stability of Nature: Answering the Classic Objection

The objection that miracles violate the laws of nature misunderstands both God and nature. Laws are descriptions of God’s ordinary providence, not chains binding His hand. A miracle is not a contradiction; it is an extraordinary act by the Sovereign Who ordinarily sustains a regular order. If God created the world and upholds it continuously, then the resurrection is not metaphysically impossible. The idea that past regularities make the future closed against Divine action is baseless. The regularity of nature itself is an effect of God’s covenant faithfulness, not a barrier to His acts. The resurrection of Jesus in 33 C.E. stands in history as a Divine act attested by witnesses, transforming cowards into bold heralds and turning enemies into confessors.

The Resurrection as Publicly Checkable History

Christian proclamation hinges on a real crucifixion under a Roman prefect and a real bodily resurrection on the third day. Jesus was executed on Nisan 14, 33 C.E., in Jerusalem during Passover. He was buried, and on the third day the tomb was empty. The earliest preaching took place in the very city where the authorities could have disproved it by producing a body. The opponents could not. The witnesses were numerous, with named individuals and large groups testifying. The apostles suffered, labored, and died because they knew the risen Christ. The Gospels are sober reportage anchored in eyewitness proximity. Their dates fall within living memory, and their details align with the topography and customs of the time. The claim that legend explains the origin of the resurrection is fantasy. Legends do not ignite precise, early, and costly testimony across hostile audiences. Rational examination leads to only one adequate cause: God raised Jesus from the dead.

Scripture’s Epistemology: Truth Is Correspondence to Reality Defined by God

Truth is what corresponds to reality as defined and created by God. That is why Scripture is repeatedly called “truth.” Jesus prayed, “Sanctify them in the truth; Your word is truth” (John 17:17). That is not a sentimental label; it is an ontological claim. Because God cannot lie, His speech is the ultimate criterion of truth. Human reasoning finds its stability by conforming to the grammar, claims, and implications of Scripture. The historical-grammatical method honors meaning by refusing to import foreign philosophies or hidden agendas into the text. It asks what the Author intended by the words He inspired, in their grammatical forms and historical settings, and it draws doctrine by following the normal rules of language. Allegorizing and typological speculation sever theology from the actual words of the text. Sound exegesis guards doctrine because it forces teachers to prove claims from demonstrable meanings.

Moral Knowledge: Without God, Objective Oughts Vanish

Irrationalism erases moral absolutes by dissolving truth into sentiment. Rationalism fails as well because it cannot derive an “ought” from an autonomous “is.” Only the living God grounds objective morality. The Decalogue is not a tribal code; it is revelation of God’s moral will. Murder is wrong, not because cultures dislike it, but because humans bear God’s image and their unjust destruction is an assault on the Maker. Sexual ethics are not negotiable preferences; they are fixed by the Creator’s design “from the beginning.” Justice in Scripture is not the clamor of groups; it is conformity to God’s law applied with equity to all persons. Remove God, and all moral talk becomes rhetoric. Anchor morality in God, and right and wrong have unchanging content.

Human Nature, Death, and the Rational Stakes

Scripture teaches that man is a soul; he does not contain an immortal soul separable by nature from the body. Death is the cessation of the person. The “spirit” is the life-force, not a distinct, conscious entity that survives death. The hope Scripture promises is resurrection by the Word and power of God. Eternal life is not an inherent property; it is a gift to those whom God grants it through Christ. Gehenna is not temporary pain; it is final, eternal destruction—the incineration that ends the wicked forever. Sheol/Hades refers to gravedom, the state of the dead. Such truths are neither irrational nor anti-scientific; they are straightforward claims about reality given by the One Who knows. Denials of these claims stem from foreign philosophies and human traditions, not from Scripture. Christian rationality allows Scripture to define man, life, death, and destiny, and then orders every argument in service to those revealed facts.

The Two-Edged Error: Why Irrationalism and Rationalism Collapse

Irrationalism says there is no binding truth. Rationalism says human reason is the binding truth. Both collapse under examination. Irrationalism cannot live by its own principle because it must assert at least one binding truth to deny all others. Rationalism cannot justify the reliability of reason, memory, senses, mathematics, or the uniformity of nature without smuggling in assumptions that only the biblical God secures. Christian theism alone provides the preconditions of intelligibility. Because God created a real, orderly world; because He made humans in His image to know; because He sustains the cosmos in consistent ways; and because He has spoken in Scripture with verbal precision, knowledge is possible, meaningful, and accountable.

Jesus Christ, the Incarnate Logos, and the Restoration of Right Reason

John calls Christ the Logos, the Word. That title is not Greek speculation imported into Scripture; it is the Holy Spirit’s inspired description of the Son’s role as the personal, divine Revealer. Apart from Christ, the mind is darkened; in Him the light of the knowledge of God shines. The gospel restores right reason by reconciling the sinner to God, renewing the mind through Scripture, and ordering the entire life by God’s truth. Christ does not call people to abandon thought; He calls them to repent of autonomous thought. He does not command leaps into oblivion; He commands steadfast obedience to written words that cannot fail.

The Resurrection and the Logic of Christian Hope

Resurrection is not a private spiritual metaphor. It is the public action in 33 C.E. that vindicated all of Jesus’ claims and secured the future resurrection of those who belong to Him. This hope is rational because it rests on testimony that is early, multiple, and coherent. It is reasonable because it fits the total worldview that grounds the laws of logic, the uniformity of nature, and moral obligation. It is realistic because it confronts death head-on, not with platitudes about immortal souls drifting off, but with the concrete promise of bodily life in a restored creation under Christ’s rule.

Genesis, Chronology, and the Coherence of Redemptive History

The biblical storyline is coherent across centuries because it is anchored in real chronology. Abraham’s covenant in 2091 B.C.E. marks the inauguration of a specific family line that leads to Christ. Israel’s Exodus in 1446 B.C.E. created the covenant nation and provided the sacrificial patterns that teach substitution and atonement. The conquest beginning in 1406 B.C.E. established the people in the land promised by God’s sworn oath. Solomon’s temple begun in 966 B.C.E. instituted the central sanctuary that foreshadows the presence of God among His people fulfilled in Christ’s incarnation and then in the congregation that gathers in His name. These dates are not optional. They safeguard the historical reality of redemption and keep doctrine tethered to verifiable acts of God.

Hermeneutics without Compromise: The Historical-Grammatical Method

The only faithful method is the historical-grammatical approach. It refuses to inject foreign theories into the text. It analyzes grammar, syntax, semantics, and historical setting, determining meaning by authorial intent. This method preserves objectivity, protects the church from fantasies, and honors the fact that God chose to reveal Himself in words with normal meanings. Higher Criticism, with its skepticism, reconstructs theoretical sources, multiplies hypothetical communities, and severs Scripture from its claims about authorship and dating. It has no right to command the church’s attention. The Bible stands as the final authority, and exegesis must bow to its claims, not domesticate them to academic fashion.

The Place of Philosophy: Handmaid, Not Mistress

Philosophy has a proper role as a disciplined reflection on reality that clarifies terms, tests arguments, and orders knowledge. It must serve theology rather than rule over it. Where philosophy contradicts Scripture, philosophy is wrong. Where it exposes fallacies and refines definitions, it serves God’s people. The apostle warns against “philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition” (Colossians 2:8). He does not banish rigorous thought; he condemns systems that make human tradition the standard. Christian thinkers are free to employ sound logic, to expose self-defeating claims, and to articulate the rational necessity of the biblical worldview, as long as Scripture remains the supreme authority.

God as the Necessary Precondition of Knowledge

All knowledge presupposes God. The laws of logic are reflections of His consistency. Mathematics displays the orderliness of His creation. Induction in science requires the stability of creation under His providence. Moral knowledge requires His holy character and commands. Language depends on the God Who speaks, establishes fixed meanings, and created human communication. Remove God, and you cannot justify reason, science, ethics, or language. Atheism borrows capital from theism to mount a rebellion against the very preconditions of that rebellion. Christian apologetics must press this point relentlessly. The unbeliever does know many things in practice because he lives in God’s world and bears God’s image, but his worldview cannot account for that knowledge. The apologist’s task is to expose the internal collapse of autonomy and to call all people to submit their reasoning to God’s revelation.

Scripture and Science Are Not Enemies

When interpreted rightly, Scripture and honest scientific observation cannot contradict because both come from God—the world by creation and Scripture by inspiration. Apparent conflicts arise either from misinterpretation of Scripture or from faulty scientific theorizing. The creation account does not require twenty-four-hour days for each creative period. The word day in Scripture can denote varying spans by context, and the narrative itself uses day flexibly. Genesis 2:1–3 even refers to the entire creative week as one “day.” This is not evasion; it is careful attention to language. The Creator’s work is majestic, ordered, and purposive. The fourth day reports the clearing of the atmosphere so that the luminaries become visible to an earthbound observer. This harmonizes the text’s perspective with a coherent understanding of God’s acts without capitulating to materialist dogma. Scripture sets the frame; observation, properly disciplined, fills in details.

Jesus’ View of Scripture Settles the Authority Question

Christ’s doctrine of Scripture is the church’s doctrine of Scripture. He treated Scripture as the unbreakable Word of God. He grounded arguments on individual words, tenses, and even the order of clauses. He rejected the religious elites’ traditions when they nullified the Word of God. When He confronted the tempter, He said, “It is written,” three times, and that settled the matter. If Jesus Christ receives Scripture as Divine authority, the church has no liberty to lower that authority. Arguments that the Bible errs are not merely academic; they accuse Christ of error in His settled view of Scripture. That accusation is unacceptable.

Answering Common Pushbacks with Scriptural Clarity and Rational Force

The charge that “faith is blind” fails because Scripture commands examination and proof. Faith receives testimony from the God Who cannot lie and from eyewitnesses He authorized. The notion that “miracles are irrational” fails because it assumes a closed system with no personal Creator; once the true God is acknowledged, miracles are extraordinary acts by the Sovereign over His own world. The claim that “the Bible is anti-intellectual” collapses before the sheer weight of its commands to wisdom, prudence, understanding, study, testing, remembering, and teaching. The allegation that “science has replaced God” misunderstands science; science presupposes order, causality, mathematics, and the reliability of reason, all of which stand on the Christian worldview. The complaint that “the problem of evil disproves God” mistakes the issue; without God there is no objective evil to complain about, and with God we have certain promises of justice, redemption, and a final destruction of wickedness in Gehenna. The cross and resurrection in 33 C.E. are God’s decisive acts to defeat sin and death; the final judgment will complete what Calvary and the empty tomb secured.

The Gospel’s Intellectual Demands: Repentance Includes the Mind

Repentance is not merely emotional regret; it is a total change of mind and direction. God commands all people everywhere to repent because He has fixed a day on which He will judge the world by the Man He has appointed, having given assurance by raising Him from the dead. That summons carries intellectual content. One must acknowledge that one’s previous thinking was proud, autonomous, and rebellious. One must bow to the full authority of Jesus Christ and of the Scriptures that testify to Him. One must receive correction from the Word of God in every area—metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, and meaning. The gospel restores a disciplined mind because it restores right worship. Idolatry makes nonsense of the world; worship of the true God restores sense.

The Church’s Intellectual Posture: Bold, Careful, and Submissive to Scripture

The Christian scholar, pastor, and lay believer must be bold because the case is strong, careful because the task is serious, and submissive because Scripture is the final standard. Boldness is not bluster; it is confidence rooted in the God Who speaks. Carefulness is not timidity; it is precision in exegesis, argument, and application. Submission is not servility; it is obedience to the Lordship of Christ over the mind. The church must train believers to think in straight lines, to detect fallacies, to read texts closely, and to argue from Scripture with charity and force. Anti-intellectualism is sin because it refuses to love God with all the mind. Arrogant rationalism is sin because it refuses to bow to God’s Word. The biblical way confronts both errors by enthroning Scripture and disciplining reason under it.

The Rational Structure of the Gospel Itself

The gospel message is inherently rational in structure. It begins with true propositions about God the Creator, man the sinner, Christ the Savior, and the summons to repent and believe. It points to public facts: Jesus lived a sinless life, died sacrificially on Nisan 14, 33 C.E., and rose bodily on the third day. It delivers promises that are either true or false: forgiveness of sins, reconciliation with God, the gift of eternal life, and the future resurrection. It demands a response that is either obedience or rebellion. Every element is intelligible and testable by Scripture and by history. Nothing about it requires abandoning logic. Everything about it requires abandoning pride. The message of the cross is the power of God precisely because it refutes human boasting and places glory where it belongs—in God.

The Public Nature of Christian Claims

Christian claims are not private inner lights. They are public truth claims bound to textual evidence and historical events. Matthew in Hebrew about 41 C.E. and in Greek about 45 C.E., Mark about 60–65 C.E., Luke about 56–58 C.E., Hebrews about 61 C.E., Revelation 96 C.E., John 98 C.E.—these are historical anchors that place the message in the open. The apostles named names, listed places, and appealed to witnesses who were alive when their writings circulated. The earliest congregations in Jerusalem knew these individuals. Christianity has nothing to fear from historical scrutiny. The truth is sturdy.

Rational Evangelism: Appealing to Conscience and Reason with Scripture

Evangelism is rational and moral. It confronts the conscience with God’s law and addresses the mind with God’s gospel. It refuses manipulation. It invites questions and answers them from Scripture. It exposes the internal contradiction of autonomy and proclaims the coherent worldview revealed by God. It does not rest content with vague spiritual platitudes. It calls sinners to repent and believe because the facts are true and the Lord is real. The argument is never the Savior, but the argument supports the summons because God uses truth to draw people to Himself.

Sanctification of the Mind by the Word

The Christian life requires disciplined thought shaped by Scripture. The mind is renewed as the Word saturates it. The church must insist on careful catechesis, robust preaching that opens texts and applies them, and the constant practice of measuring every thought by the written standard. The Holy Spirit has given a sufficient, finished revelation. He guides the church through the Word He inspired, not through private impressions or inner voices. That conviction protects the church from gullibility and error. It establishes stable doctrine and produces a congregation of believers who think as Christians in their homes, vocations, and communities.

The Rational Destiny of the World under Christ’s Kingdom

Christian eschatology is clear. Christ will return before a literal thousand-year reign. He will judge with perfect righteousness. The few will rule with Christ in heaven; the many righteous will inherit eternal life on earth. Wickedness will be punished in Gehenna with final destruction, not ongoing conscious torment. Every promise God has made will stand. The result is not a dissolution into meaninglessness but the establishment of an ordered, righteous, everlasting reality in which knowledge, worship, and obedience are aligned. This is the only coherent destiny because it is the destiny promised by the God Who cannot lie and demonstrated in history by the resurrection of His Son.

Bringing It All Together without Compromise

The church must refuse both the sneers of irrationalism and the pride of rationalism. It must stand with the apostles, who reasoned from the Scriptures, appealed to the public acts of God, and demanded the obedience of faith. It must train minds to love logic, to hate fallacy, to cherish precision, and to submit every premise and every conclusion to the perfect Word of God. The authority of Scripture is non-negotiable, the use of reason is mandatory under that authority, and the gospel is the center that orders every inquiry. Abraham believed God in 2091 B.C.E. because God spoke truth. Israel marched out of Egypt in 1446 B.C.E. because God displayed power and promised redemption. Jesus died on Nisan 14, 33 C.E., and rose on the third day because God decreed salvation and executed His plan in public. The future is secure because the same God has promised to finish what He began. This is not a posture of timid compromise. It is the robust, rational, realistic confession that the Bible is the inerrant, infallible Word of God and that reason flourishes only when it kneels before revelation.

You May Also Enjoy

Do Miracles Serve as Evidence for the Truth of Christianity?

About the Author