UNINTENTIONAL ERRORS: The Necessity of Textual Criticism

Textual criticism delves into errors in textual evidence, aiming to preserve original words. With an abundance of evidence, conjectural emendation has little place. While only a small portion of text is questioned, unintentional and intentional errors lead to variant readings. These errors include those of the eye, pen, speech, mind, memory, and judgment.

FROM SPOKEN WORDS TO SACRED TEXTS

Many good Christian biblical apologists spend a lifetime defending the trustworthiness of God’s Word. Many modern-day textual scholars seem to be apologists of another sort. They seem to be apologists for uncertainty and ambiguity as Daniel Wallace in the Foreword of MYTHS AND MISTAKES in New Testament Textual Criticism (2019) writes, “The new generation of evangelical scholars is far more comfortable with ambiguity and uncertainty than previous generations.” (Page xii)

PAPYRUS 46 (P46): a Papyrus Bible Manuscript From About 125-150 C.E.

Contents: P46 contains most of the Pauline epistles, though with some folios missing. It contains (in order) “the last eight chapters of Romans; all of Hebrews; virtually all of 1–2 Corinthians; all of Ephesians, Galatians, Philippians, Colossians; and two chapters of 1 Thessalonians. All of the leaves have lost some lines at the bottom through deterioration.”

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑