Teaching Begins With Submission to Scripture

The ability to teach God’s Word begins with the recognition that the teacher serves a message whose authority does not originate with him. His responsibility is to explain what Scripture communicates rather than use biblical language to promote his own ideas. Titus 1:9 requires the qualified elder to hold firmly to the faithful word so that he can encourage through sound teaching and refute contradiction. That requirement concerns a particular responsibility within the congregation, but the need for fidelity to Scripture applies wherever Christians explain biblical truth. A parent instructing a child and a believer discussing the gospel with a neighbor must also distinguish God’s teaching from personal opinion. Confidence of delivery cannot compensate for an inaccurate explanation. The teacher’s first obligation is therefore to learn what the passage means and remain accountable to it.

Ezra 7:10 provides a clear pattern in the relationship between study, practice, and teaching. Ezra prepared his heart to study Jehovah’s Law, do it, and teach its requirements in Israel. The order protects teaching from becoming an activity separated from personal obedience. Romans 2:21 similarly confronts the inconsistency of instructing others while failing to receive the same instruction oneself. A Christian explaining patience must work on his own conduct when inconvenienced, and one teaching honesty must reject misleading speech in ordinary dealings. Imperfection does not remove every opportunity to teach, but deliberate hypocrisy undermines the integrity of the instruction. Effective preparation therefore includes examination of the teacher’s life as well as examination of the text.

Establishing the Meaning Before Preparing the Presentation

A teacher should first determine the passage’s central point, its supporting details, and its relationship to the surrounding context. The historical-grammatical method seeks the author’s intended meaning through the actual language and historical circumstances of the communication. It does not begin by choosing an attractive theme and searching for phrases that can be made to support it. Second Timothy 2:15 calls for handling the word of truth correctly, which places accuracy before rhetorical effect. A teacher should identify whether the passage contains a command, a promise, an account of events, an argument, or a statement made by someone within an account. Each form must be interpreted according to what it communicates. Skipping this work increases the likelihood that an appealing presentation will teach something the passage never says.

For example, a lesson on courage drawn from Joshua 1:6–9 should explain Joshua’s responsibility and the relationship between his leadership and obedience to the Law. It should not promise every Christian success in any chosen project merely because Joshua was commanded to be strong. The teacher can draw legitimate instruction about faithfulness to God while preserving the specific circumstances of the original commission. Similarly, an explanation of Philippians 4:13 must retain Paul’s discussion of contentment in need and abundance. The verse cannot responsibly become a guarantee of athletic victory, business expansion, or personal ambition. These distinctions may require more preparation than a slogan, but they give listeners an accurate basis for trust. Clear teaching grows from clear interpretation.

Knowing What the Learner Needs to Understand

A teacher must consider the listener’s existing knowledge without assuming either complete ignorance or advanced understanding. Acts 8:30–35 records Philip asking the Ethiopian official whether he understood what he was reading. The official’s reply identified his need for guidance, and his specific question concerned the person described in the passage from Isaiah. Philip then began with that Scripture and explained the good news about Jesus. The sequence shows attention to the actual point of difficulty rather than an immediate delivery of unrelated information. A modern teacher should likewise identify the question the learner is trying to resolve. Teaching becomes more useful when it begins where understanding is incomplete.

A child hearing the word redemption for the first time may need a plain explanation before the teacher develops its significance. An adult who knows many biblical expressions may still misunderstand the relationship between Christ’s sacrifice, repentance, and continued faithfulness. The teacher should not infer comprehension merely because the learner can repeat familiar terminology. A respectful question asking the learner to explain a point in his own words can reveal whether the meaning is clear. Proverbs 20:5 commends the ability to draw out what lies within a person’s thinking. That ability requires patience and interest rather than a sequence of questions designed to expose ignorance. The teacher seeks information that will help him instruct accurately and appropriately.

Organizing Instruction Around a Clear Main Point

A lesson becomes difficult to follow when every interesting detail receives equal attention. The teacher should identify the central truth the passage communicates and arrange supporting material so that listeners can see how it establishes that truth. Nehemiah 8:8 describes reading the Law and giving explanation so that the hearers understood the reading. That objective differs from demonstrating how much the teacher has studied. A short explanation that makes the author’s meaning clear may accomplish more than a lengthy presentation containing numerous disconnected references. Details belong in the lesson when they clarify the passage, support the reasoning, or prevent a likely misunderstanding. Material that serves none of those purposes may be accurate but unnecessary for that occasion.

Suppose the lesson concerns truthful speech in Ephesians 4:25. The teacher can explain the command to reject falsehood, the positive requirement to speak truth, and the reason Paul gives concerning the relationship among believers. A concrete illustration might concern correcting an inaccurate report instead of allowing it to benefit oneself. Additional passages can clarify the same responsibility, but the teacher should avoid moving without explanation into every biblical subject connected with speech. The listener needs to understand the chosen passage before being asked to follow a much wider discussion. First Corinthians 14:9 emphasizes the necessity of intelligible speech for communication. Although Paul addresses a specific congregational problem, the requirement that hearers understand the words remains directly relevant to teaching.

Explaining Scripture Rather Than Merely Reading It

Reading a passage aloud is important, but a teacher should not assume that the connection between the text and the point being made is obvious. He needs to identify the relevant words, explain their relationship, and show how the conclusion follows. Acts 17:2–3 describes Paul reasoning from the Scriptures, explaining and establishing the necessity of the Christ’s suffering and resurrection. The account presents an argument rather than a bare sequence of citations. A teacher should likewise make his reasoning visible so that listeners can examine it. Saying that a verse proves something is insufficient when the audience cannot see why. Explanation respects both the authority of Scripture and the listener’s responsibility to understand.

For instance, a lesson on generosity from Ephesians 4:28 should show that Paul moves from abandoning theft to honest work and then to sharing with someone in need. The teacher can ask listeners to observe that the verse addresses what a person stops doing, what he begins doing, and one proper use of his earnings. Those elements arise from the sentence itself and do not require an invented hidden meaning. The explanation can then distinguish generosity from irresponsibility by considering other relevant instructions concerning household obligations. First Timothy 5:8 establishes the seriousness of caring for one’s own household. Teaching these passages accurately prevents one duty from being used to neglect another. The resulting instruction is practical because its reasoning is anchored in the words of Scripture.

Using Questions and Illustrations With Restraint

Questions can direct attention to details a listener has overlooked and help him reason through an issue. In Matthew 22:41–46, Jesus asked questions that required His hearers to consider the relationship between the Messiah and David. His questions exposed a difficulty within their understanding and directed attention to Scripture. A teacher can similarly ask who is speaking, what reason is given, or how a proposed conclusion fits the surrounding passage. Such questions should be answerable from the material being examined. They should not depend on obscure information that allows the teacher to display superiority. Their purpose is to develop understanding rather than to make the learner anxious about being wrong.

Illustrations are useful when they clarify a point already established by the text. A teacher explaining the danger of answering prematurely can describe a person who responds to half a question and consequently addresses the wrong concern. The illustration makes the principle in Proverbs 18:13 concrete without becoming the basis of the doctrine. Every illustration has limits, and those limits should be acknowledged when they affect the explanation. An analogy drawn from human relationships cannot establish every detail about Jehovah’s nature or actions. Nor should an emotionally powerful anecdote be presented as fact unless its accuracy is known. Restraint protects the lesson from allowing memorable material to overshadow the biblical instruction it was intended to clarify.

Correcting Error While Preserving a Teachable Setting

A teacher must sometimes address a mistaken belief directly. Second Timothy 2:24–25 requires the Lord’s servant to avoid quarrels, show kindness, be able to teach, and correct opponents with gentleness. These requirements do not weaken the obligation to identify error; they govern how that obligation is fulfilled. The teacher should describe the mistaken claim accurately before explaining why it conflicts with Scripture. If he exaggerates the claim to make it easier to refute, he has introduced a new error into his own presentation. A learner is more likely to examine correction when he can recognize his actual position in the teacher’s description. Truthful representation is therefore part of faithful correction.

Priscilla and Aquila’s interaction with Apollos in Acts 18:24–26 demonstrates that an able speaker can still require a more accurate explanation. They took him aside and provided that instruction rather than treating his incomplete understanding as an occasion for public humiliation. The account does not remove the need for public correction when a public error requires it. It does show the value of choosing a manner that serves the person and the truth together. A teacher correcting a student’s misunderstanding of resurrection can begin with the student’s stated belief and examine the relevant passages patiently. He need not ridicule the student’s family, previous teachers, or motives. The aim is a corrected understanding that the learner can explain and evaluate.

Progress Requires Practice, Feedback, and Proper Responsibility

First Timothy 4:13–16 joins attention to public reading, exhortation, teaching, personal conduct, and perseverance. Paul expected Timothy’s progress to become evident through sustained application to these responsibilities. The passage shows that teaching ability should develop rather than remain fixed at its earliest level. A Christian can review whether listeners understood his main point, whether his references were relevant, and whether his explanations were needlessly complicated. Feedback from a mature believer may reveal habits that the teacher does not notice, such as speaking too quickly or leaving important terms undefined. Improvement should be directed toward helping listeners understand Scripture rather than cultivating an impressive performance. Greater clarity and accuracy are more valuable measures than applause.

Teaching responsibility must also remain within the arrangements Scripture establishes. First Timothy 2:12 and 1 Timothy 3:1–7 govern authoritative congregational teaching and the qualifications of overseers, while Titus 2:3–5 identifies appropriate instruction by mature women. Matthew 28:19–20 establishes the continuing importance of making disciples and teaching obedience to Christ’s commands. These passages should be considered together so that broad Christian responsibility is not confused with eligibility for every congregational office. Parents, individual believers, and qualified male pastors serve in settings with differing responsibilities. Each should cultivate the knowledge and skill appropriate to the work Scripture permits and requires. Careful preparation, faithful conduct, and willingness to receive correction allow that work to become increasingly useful.

You May Also Enjoy

Regarding Forgiveness, What Is the Difference Between Willful Sin and Ignorant Sin?

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS