Mary of Bethany: Honoring Jesus While Others Criticized Her

Please Help Us Keep These Thousands of Blog Posts Growing and Free for All

$5.00

Devotion Expressed Through a Costly Act

Mary of Bethany appears repeatedly in the Gospel record as a woman who gave serious attention to Jesus and acted upon what she understood about Him. Luke 10:38-42 records an earlier occasion when Martha was occupied with serving while Mary sat at Jesus’ feet listening to His teaching, and Jesus affirmed that Mary had chosen the good portion. That account does not condemn necessary household labor, because service itself was honorable, but it establishes Mary’s determination not to allow ordinary duties to crowd out attention to Christ’s words. John 11 later records the death and resurrection of her brother Lazarus, placing Mary within a household that personally experienced Jesus’ compassion and authority over death. By John 12:1-8, only six days before the Passover, Jesus had returned to Bethany and was sharing a meal where Martha served and Lazarus reclined at the table. Mary then took approximately a Roman pound of expensive perfumed ointment made from pure nard, anointed Jesus’ feet, and wiped His feet with her hair. John emphasizes the physical abundance of the action by stating that the house became filled with the fragrance of the ointment. Courage in Mary’s case did not first appear as a speech before hostile rulers but as public devotion to Jesus when devotion became expensive, visible, and vulnerable to criticism.

John 12:3 must be allowed to retain its concrete details because each contributes to the force of Mary’s action. Pure nard was a costly aromatic product, and John 12:5 records Judas estimating its value at three hundred denarii, an amount corresponding to approximately eleven months of wages for an ordinary laborer. Mary therefore was not using something trivial that could be replaced without meaningful sacrifice. Mark 14:3 records the woman breaking the alabaster container and pouring the perfume upon Jesus’ head, while John focuses upon the anointing of His feet, complementary details that together describe an abundant act rather than contradictory versions. The expense made criticism predictable because observers could calculate what else might have been done with something so valuable. Yet genuine devotion to Jesus cannot always be measured by the standards of people who evaluate obedience only according to immediate material efficiency. Mary was not careless with something entrusted to her; she deliberately used something precious in an extraordinary act directed toward the One she recognized as worthy of exceptional honor. Christian courage sometimes requires accepting that obedience will look wasteful to people who do not value Christ as Scripture requires.

Criticism Disguised as Moral Concern

John 12:4-6 identifies Judas Iscariot as the disciple who objected most specifically, asking why the perfume had not been sold for three hundred denarii and the proceeds given to the poor. On the surface, the question sounded socially responsible because Scripture repeatedly commands concern for needy people, and Jesus Himself taught generosity toward them. John, however, provides information that exposes Judas’ actual motive: he was not concerned about the poor but was a thief who carried the money box and stole from what was placed in it. This detail warns Christians that moral language does not automatically reveal moral motives. A critic can speak about compassion, stewardship, efficiency, fairness, or responsibility while using those respected concepts to conceal selfishness, resentment, greed, or hostility toward sincere devotion. Mark 14:4-5 indicates that others also expressed indignation and criticized the woman sharply, demonstrating how one objection can spread through a group until a faithful person finds herself facing collective disapproval. Mary’s courage did not require her to defeat each critic in argument, because Jesus Himself defended the meaning of her action. Christians likewise must learn that not every accusation deserves frantic self-defense when Scripture clearly establishes the rightness of what they are doing.

Jesus’ response in John 12:7-8 was direct: “Let her alone,” and He connected Mary’s act with the day of His burial. Mark 14:6 likewise records Jesus saying, “Let her alone; why do you trouble her? She has done a good work to me,” placing His evaluation against the criticism being directed toward her. His statement that the poor would always be present did not minimize Christian responsibility toward needy people, because the Mosaic Law itself recognized continuing poverty while commanding generosity in Deuteronomy 15:7-11. Jesus’ point concerned a unique moment: He would not remain bodily present with them indefinitely, and His approaching death made Mary’s action especially appropriate. Mark 14:8 records Jesus explaining that she had done what she could and had anointed His body beforehand for burial. Her action therefore possessed significance that the critics failed to perceive because they were evaluating the perfume while Jesus evaluated the devotion and timing behind its use. Courage often requires allowing Christ’s revealed judgment to carry more weight than the loudest human criticism. A Christian who knows from Scripture that an action is right should not abandon it merely because another person attaches an impressive moral accusation to it.

She Did What She Could

Jesus’ statement in Mark 14:8 that Mary “did what she could” gives Christian courage a profoundly practical dimension. Scripture does not present her as accomplishing everything that needed to be done during the final days of Jesus’ earthly ministry, nor does it suggest that she possessed the responsibilities assigned to the apostles. She acted within the opportunity, resources, knowledge, and relationship that were actually hers. Many Christians become discouraged because they compare what they can presently do with what another believer appears able to accomplish, but biblical faithfulness is measured by obedience to one’s real responsibilities rather than by imaginary comparisons. A Christian woman caring for aging parents may have fewer hours for public evangelism than another believer, yet she can speak faithfully when opportunities arise and honor Jehovah through responsible caregiving. A Christian man supporting a family through demanding labor may not possess the schedule of a full-time Bible teacher, yet he can maintain personal study, instruct his children, attend congregational worship, and speak about Christ when circumstances permit. A young believer with limited knowledge cannot answer every objection but can accurately explain what he has learned and continue developing skill through study. Mary’s example teaches courage through faithful action rather than through the pursuit of religious prominence.

The phrase “she did what she could” also guards against spiritual passivity because limited ability does not justify doing nothing. Mary could not stop Jesus’ enemies from plotting His death, could not prevent Judas from betraying Him, and could not control the decisions of the religious authorities or the Roman governor. What she could do was honor Jesus directly, and she did so decisively. Christians live in a wicked world influenced by Satan, demons, sinful institutions, and human imperfection, and no individual believer can correct every form of wrongdoing encountered. Ecclesiastes 9:10 nevertheless urges a person to do with his might what his hand finds to do, while Galatians 6:10 directs Christians to do good to all as they have opportunity, especially toward fellow believers. Courage refuses to use the existence of enormous problems as an excuse for neglecting reachable responsibilities. A believer may not be able to change national morality, but he can keep his own household morally clean, teach biblical truth, help a person in genuine need, and refuse participation in wrongdoing. Mary did not wait until she could control everything around Jesus; she acted faithfully within the opportunity immediately before her.

The Courage to Be Misunderstood

Being criticized while deliberately disobeying Scripture is not courage, because stubbornness and courage must never be confused. Mary’s conduct was vindicated because Jesus Himself declared that she had done a good work, so the authority for evaluating her behavior came from Christ rather than from her confidence in personal sincerity. Proverbs 14:12 warns that a way may appear right to a man while ultimately leading to death, which means personal conviction alone cannot determine whether criticism should be ignored. The Christian therefore needs to ask whether Scripture supports the action, whether the motive is morally sound, whether proper responsibilities are being respected, and whether correction from mature believers reveals a genuine biblical problem. When the answers show that the conduct is faithful, criticism should not automatically produce retreat. Acts 5:29 later records Peter and the apostles declaring that they must obey God rather than men when human authorities directly opposed Christ’s command. Mary illustrates the quieter side of that same allegiance: she did not abandon an act of honor merely because people around her considered it foolish. Courage accepts correction when Scripture proves the correction right and accepts misunderstanding when Scripture proves the criticism wrong.

Modern Christians frequently experience pressures in which obedience is portrayed as unreasonable, extreme, outdated, or socially inconvenient. A believer who refuses sexual immorality may be told that biblical morality is repressive, yet 1 Corinthians 6:18 commands Christians to flee sexual immorality rather than redefine it. A Christian who refuses dishonest business practices may be accused of lacking practical sense, yet Ephesians 4:25 commands the putting away of falsehood and requires truthful speech. A believer who rejects drunkenness may be mocked for refusing ordinary social behavior, yet Ephesians 5:18 explicitly warns against getting drunk with wine. Christian parents who consistently teach Scripture may be criticized for taking religion too seriously, but Deuteronomy 6:6-7 illustrates the principle of regular family instruction, and Ephesians 6:4 requires fathers to bring children up in the discipline and instruction of the Lord. Mary’s costly devotion demonstrates that criticism cannot be the final measure of whether obedience is wise. The Christian must listen carefully enough to distinguish valid correction from pressure designed to weaken biblical loyalty.

Honor Directed Toward Christ Rather Than Self

Mary’s action possessed another courageous quality because it directed attention toward Jesus rather than toward herself. John 12:3 does not record Mary giving a speech explaining why everyone should admire her sacrifice, and the fragrance filled the house because of the perfume rather than because she announced its financial value. Matthew 6:1-4 warns against practicing righteousness for the purpose of being seen by men, showing that even objectively good acts become morally corrupted when applause becomes their controlling motive. Judas, by contrast, spoke publicly about concern for the poor while secretly serving greed, making the contrast between appearance and motive especially sharp. Mary gave something valuable without using the gift to purchase authority, recognition, or control over Jesus. Her action therefore differs from religious giving in which a donor expects influence, special treatment, public praise, or immunity from correction. Acts 4:36-37 later records Barnabas selling a field and giving the proceeds to meet needs, while Acts 5:1-11 immediately contrasts genuine generosity with the deceptive reputation-seeking of Ananias and Sapphira. Christian courage includes the willingness to do good even when the primary reward is Jehovah’s approval rather than human acknowledgment.

This orientation toward Christ helps explain why Mary was prepared to use something of substantial value rather than protecting it merely because it was expensive. Matthew 6:19-21 warns against storing treasures on earth as the controlling focus of life and teaches that a person’s heart follows his treasure. Jesus did not condemn property, responsible provision, or legitimate savings, but He repeatedly exposed the spiritual danger of allowing possessions to become masters. Mary possessed something precious enough that its use provoked immediate financial calculation, yet she was willing to relinquish it in honoring Jesus. The specific act cannot simply be copied today because Jesus is not physically present awaiting burial, but the underlying priority remains instructive. Christians can use time, energy, money, abilities, homes, transportation, and material possessions to support Scripturally defined responsibilities without allowing those resources to become objects of worship. Hebrews 13:16 urges believers not to forget doing good and sharing what they have, because such sacrifices are pleasing to God. Courage with possessions means holding them as resources for faithful service rather than allowing fear of material loss to govern every decision.

Remembered Because Jesus Considered the Act Worthy

Jesus gave Mary’s act an extraordinary place in the future proclamation of the good news. Matthew 26:13 and Mark 14:9 record Him saying that wherever the good news would be proclaimed throughout the world, what the woman had done would also be spoken of in memory of her. The statement was not permission to turn Mary into an object of religious veneration, because worship belongs to Jehovah and salvation comes through Christ rather than through honoring human disciples. Jesus instead guaranteed that her act of devotion would remain attached to the Gospel record because it revealed something worthy of remembrance. Nearly two thousand years later, readers still encounter her action whenever they carefully read the inspired narratives, demonstrating the remarkable fulfillment of Jesus’ words. The people criticizing Mary may have considered the perfume wasted within minutes, but Jesus declared her action worthy of remembrance wherever the good news would go. Human judgments about what constitutes significance are therefore often radically different from Christ’s evaluation. Courage chooses the evaluation that will matter before Jehovah long after passing criticism has disappeared.

Mary’s remembered act also demonstrates why Christians must avoid measuring service exclusively through visible numerical results. She did not preach to three thousand people as Peter later did in Acts 2:41, undertake missionary journeys like Paul, or provide the recorded public defense that Stephen delivered before the Sanhedrin. Her contribution in this account occurred inside a house at Bethany through one act of personal devotion. Jesus nevertheless treated it as significant enough to accompany the worldwide proclamation of the good news. A believer who teaches one child carefully, encourages one discouraged Christian, provides one meal for a needy family, gives transportation to someone who cannot otherwise attend worship, or spends patient hours studying Scripture with one interested person may perform service largely unnoticed by others. Hebrews 6:10 says that God is not unrighteous so as to forget the work and love shown toward His name in serving fellow believers. Biblical courage therefore rejects the craving to make every faithful act impressive before an audience. Mary honored Jesus while others criticized her, and Christ’s judgment of the act ultimately mattered more than every complaint voiced in the room.

Courage That Chooses Christ’s Approval

Mary of Bethany teaches that courage can be quiet, costly, morally clear, and deeply resistant to social pressure. She listened when ordinary activity threatened to distract attention from Jesus in Luke 10:38-42, grieved sincerely at Lazarus’ death in John 11, and honored Jesus boldly when criticism surrounded her in John 12:1-8. These passages do not portray a woman seeking controversy, because her attention consistently remained directed toward Jesus rather than toward winning disputes. The criticism came because her devotion exposed different values within the room, especially the greed Judas concealed beneath charitable language. Jesus did not merely tolerate Mary’s act but defended it, interpreted its significance in relation to His burial, and ensured that it would be remembered. Christians therefore learn from Mary not to seek opposition but to expect that serious obedience can produce opposition when other people value comfort, reputation, money, or human approval more highly than Christ. Galatians 1:10 later asks whether a servant of Christ can make pleasing men his controlling objective, and the expected answer is no. Courage becomes durable when the believer decides beforehand that Christ’s revealed judgment will outrank public applause.

A Christian shaped by Mary’s example will listen carefully to Scripture, act within genuine opportunities, hold possessions loosely enough to use them in faithful service, and refuse to let unfair criticism become master of the conscience. Such a believer will also remain correctable, because Mary’s example is not permission to baptize every personal preference with the language of devotion. The controlling question is always what Jesus and the Spirit-inspired Scriptures actually approve. When Scripture commands action, courage moves even when others call obedience excessive; when Scripture forbids action, courage refuses even when others call compromise reasonable. When motives become mixed, the Christian examines the heart in light of passages such as Hebrews 4:12-13 rather than merely defending appearances. When good deeds are ignored, the believer remembers that Jehovah sees what human observers may overlook. When faithful action is criticized, the Christian can continue without bitterness, because Jesus’ defense of Mary demonstrates that the final value of obedience is not established by the critic. Mary of Bethany therefore remains a powerful example of courage expressed through wholehearted honor toward Christ while refusing to surrender to the pressure of disapproval.

You May Also Enjoy

Zechariah and Elizabeth: Serving Jehovah Faithfully Through Years of Disappointment

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑

Discover more from Christian Publishing House Blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading