The question “What would Jesus do?” has endured because it presses Christian faith beyond slogans, decorations, and Sunday attendance into the real decisions of daily life. Charles M. Sheldon’s In His Steps placed that question before ordinary church members who had to face business pressure, social indifference, personal comfort, and the suffering of neighbors. A 21st-century update must not turn the question into emotional sentiment or moral theater, because Jesus is not a vague symbol of kindness but the Son of God whose words carry divine authority. The question must be answered by Scripture, not by impulse, church tradition, personality, politics, or the shifting standards of a wicked world. John 5:19 shows that Jesus did nothing independently from the Father but acted in full harmony with the Father’s will, so imitation of Christ begins with submission to the revealed Word of God. First Peter 2:21 says that Christ left Christians “an example” so that they might follow His steps, which means the church must learn His thinking, speech, priorities, obedience, courage, and love. A congregation transformed by this question will not merely ask what Jesus might approve but will search the Scriptures to know what He taught, how He treated people, what He rejected, and what He commanded. When this question is taken seriously, it becomes a congregational discipline that reshapes worship, evangelism, leadership, family life, personal integrity, and care for spiritually endangered people.

The Question Must Be Governed by the Spirit-Inspired Word

The “What would Jesus do?” challenge can transform a church only when the congregation understands that Jesus’ will is not discovered through private impressions but through the Spirit-inspired Scriptures. Second Timothy 3:16-17 teaches that all Scripture is inspired by God and equips the man of God for every good work, so the church does not need mystical shortcuts to know how Christ wants His followers to live. John 17:17 records Jesus’ prayer, “Sanctify them in the truth; your word is truth,” showing that spiritual separation from the world is produced by divine truth, not religious excitement. The Holy Spirit guided the writing of Scripture, and the Spirit continues to instruct Christians through that written Word, which means the congregation must become a Bible-shaped people. For example, when a church faces gossip, financial dishonesty, laziness in evangelism, or moral compromise, the answer is not to wait for a feeling but to open passages such as Ephesians 4:25-32, Colossians 3:1-17, and Matthew 28:19-20. A church that asks “What would Jesus do?” without anchoring the answer in Scripture will soon make Jesus resemble the preferences of its strongest personalities. A church that lets Scripture answer the question will be corrected, strengthened, and united under Christ’s authority. This is why the historical-grammatical reading of Scripture matters: the reader must ask what the biblical writer meant by the words he used, in the grammar, context, and historical setting God caused to be recorded.

A 21st-century congregation must also resist the habit of treating Jesus as a general moral example while ignoring His specific teachings. Matthew 7:24-27 records Jesus’ comparison between the wise man who hears and does His words and the foolish man who hears but does not act, which places obedience at the center of discipleship. The difference between the two houses was not whether they heard Jesus, because both heard Him, but whether the hearing produced obedient action. In a modern church, this distinction appears when members can discuss sermons, post spiritual statements, and sing with enthusiasm, yet continue in patterns the Scriptures condemn. James 1:22 warns Christians to be doers of the word and not hearers only, deceiving themselves, so the “What would Jesus do?” question exposes self-deception. A congregation that hears Jesus on forgiveness must act on Matthew 18:21-35 by refusing bitterness and pursuing peace in a righteous way. A congregation that hears Jesus on sexual purity must act on Matthew 5:27-30 by treating lust as a serious moral danger rather than entertainment. A congregation that hears Jesus on evangelism must act on Matthew 9:37-38 and Matthew 28:19-20 by training every believer to speak truthfully and compassionately about the kingdom of God and the sacrifice of Christ.

From Religious Attendance to Active Discipleship

Many churches remain weak because members confuse attendance with discipleship, but Jesus never defined discipleship as passive religious presence. Luke 9:23 records Jesus saying that anyone who wants to come after Him must deny himself, take up his cross daily, and follow Him, which calls for a daily pattern of obedient self-denial. This does not mean theatrical hardship or self-made religious burdens, but the steady refusal to let comfort, pride, fear, entertainment, or money rule the heart. A person may sit in a church building every week and still avoid the costly decisions that mark real discipleship. The “What would Jesus do?” challenge becomes transformative when elders, teachers, parents, young people, and new believers all learn to ask the question before choosing entertainment, handling conflict, spending money, posting online, dating, working, speaking, or responding to criticism. For example, before forwarding an accusation about another Christian, a disciple asks whether Jesus would spread unverified harm or whether He would obey Matthew 18:15 by addressing sin directly and rightly. Before joining dishonest workplace practices, a disciple asks whether Jesus would gain approval through compromise or whether He would obey the righteousness He taught in Matthew 6:33. Before treating evangelism as optional, a disciple asks whether Jesus would remain silent while people are alienated from God or whether He would continue seeking the lost, as shown in Luke 19:10.

A church transformed by this challenge will also distinguish between emotional enthusiasm and obedient perseverance. Jesus’ ministry attracted crowds, but He repeatedly clarified that following Him required more than excitement, as shown in Luke 14:25-33. He used direct language about counting the cost because superficial followers disappear when obedience becomes inconvenient. In a 21st-century setting, that cost may include refusing dishonest academic shortcuts, rejecting sexually immoral entertainment, choosing modest speech, forgiving an offender, ending a corrupt business practice, or speaking biblical truth when peers ridicule it. The church must teach these matters concretely because vague preaching creates vague consciences. If a teenager is tempted to cheat on an exam, the question “What would Jesus do?” is answered by Colossians 3:23, which commands work to be done heartily as for Jehovah and not for men. If a worker is pressured to falsify numbers, the question is answered by Proverbs 11:1, which says a false balance is an abomination to Jehovah. If a family is drowning in resentment, the question is answered by Ephesians 4:32, which calls Christians to be kind, tenderhearted, and forgiving as God forgave them in Christ.

The Mind of Christ Must Shape the Whole Congregation

Philippians 2:5 commands Christians to have the mind among themselves that was also in Christ Jesus, which means the church must cultivate shared patterns of humility, obedience, service, and reverence for God. The context of Philippians 2:1-11 shows that Paul was not speaking of shallow politeness but of a deep congregational mindset that rejects selfish ambition and empty conceit. Jesus humbled Himself in obedience, and His people must learn to reject the desire to be noticed, praised, defended, and served. In church life, this means leaders do not use authority to build personal importance, teachers do not use knowledge to embarrass the uninformed, and members do not use service as a stage for self-display. Mark 10:45 says that the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve and to give His life as a ransom for many, so Christian greatness is measured by obedient service under God. A congregation applying “What would Jesus do?” will ask whether its meetings, decisions, conversations, and ministries display the humility of Christ or the ambition of fallen men. When a disagreement arises over music, scheduling, money, or responsibilities, Philippians 2:3-4 requires each person to look not only to his own interests but also to the interests of others. This does not mean truth is compromised, because Jesus never sacrificed truth for peace, but it does mean selfishness is denied so righteousness can govern the church.

The mind of Christ must also shape how a congregation treats weak, wounded, confused, or spiritually endangered people. Matthew 12:20, applying the prophetic picture to Jesus, says He would not break a bruised reed or quench a smoldering wick, which reveals His gentleness toward those who are struggling and reachable. At the same time, Jesus rebuked hardened hypocrisy with clarity, as seen in Matthew 23:13-36, showing that compassion and moral courage belong together. A church becomes unhealthy when it reverses this pattern by being harsh with the weak and gentle with the defiant. For example, a young believer who confesses temptation and seeks help should be met with Galatians 6:1, where spiritual ones restore such a person in a spirit of gentleness while watching themselves. By contrast, a person who spreads destructive teaching or persists in open wrongdoing must be addressed according to Titus 1:9-13 and First Corinthians 5:1-13, because love for the congregation requires moral protection. The “What would Jesus do?” challenge therefore produces neither sentimental permissiveness nor cold severity. It produces shepherding that is patient with repentance, firm against rebellion, and always governed by Scripture.

Evangelism Becomes the Congregation’s Shared Work

No church can honestly ask “What would Jesus do?” while neglecting evangelism, because Jesus came to seek and save the lost. Luke 4:43 records Jesus saying that He had to proclaim the good news of the kingdom of God, because that was why He was sent. Matthew 28:19-20 commands disciples to make disciples of all nations, baptizing them and teaching them to observe all that Jesus commanded. This command was not given to a professional religious class while ordinary Christians watched from a distance. The entire congregation must be trained to explain sin, repentance, Christ’s sacrifice, resurrection, obedience, baptism by immersion, and the hope of eternal life. A modern church can begin by helping members prepare clear biblical answers to common questions: why humans die, why Christ’s sacrifice was necessary, what the kingdom of God is, why the resurrection matters, and what baptism means. Acts 17:2-3 shows Paul reasoning from the Scriptures, explaining and proving that it was necessary for the Christ to suffer and rise from the dead. That example gives the church a concrete model: evangelism is not manipulation, entertainment, or pressure; it is patient biblical reasoning joined with sincere concern for the hearer.

The question “What would Jesus do?” also corrects the church’s attitude toward people outside the congregation. Jesus did not treat the lost as interruptions to His schedule but as people needing truth, mercy, repentance, and reconciliation with God. Matthew 9:36 says He saw the crowds and had compassion for them because they were harassed and scattered like sheep without a shepherd. This compassion did not make Him reduce God’s standards, because He called people to repent, believe, and obey. In John 4:7-26, Jesus spoke with the Samaritan woman directly about worship, sin, and the coming Messiah, and He did so with clarity rather than contempt. A 21st-century church that follows His steps will not mock unbelievers, hide from them, flatter them, or imitate them. It will speak with seriousness about judgment, death, resurrection, and eternal life, while also showing genuine patience and personal concern. The congregation’s evangelistic culture changes when members stop asking, “Will this be awkward?” and start asking, “How would Jesus speak truthfully and lovingly to this person before me?”

Integrity in Work, Money, and Public Witness

A church transformed by the “What would Jesus do?” challenge will become noticeably different in work ethic, financial honesty, and public conduct. Jesus taught that a person cannot serve God and money, as recorded in Matthew 6:24, and that warning reaches directly into modern choices about career, debt, greed, generosity, and business ethics. Churches lose credibility when members sing about faith while cheating customers, exploiting workers, hiding income dishonestly, or treating generosity as optional. Ephesians 4:28 commands the thief to stop stealing, labor honestly, and share with anyone in need, which shows that conversion changes both hands and heart. Colossians 3:22-24 instructs workers to serve sincerely, not merely to please human supervisors, because they serve the Lord Christ. For the business owner, this means fair weights, truthful advertising, just wages, and refusal to profit from deception. For the employee, this means honest hours, responsible effort, and faithful performance even when no one is watching. When outsiders learn that church members keep promises, pay debts, admit mistakes, and refuse dishonest gain, the congregation’s witness becomes harder to dismiss.

This transformation must be specific because financial compromise often hides behind respectable language. A contractor may call inflated billing “normal practice,” but Proverbs 20:23 says differing weights are an abomination to Jehovah, and false scales are not good. A student may call plagiarism “getting help,” but Romans 13:13 commands Christians to walk properly, not in disgraceful conduct. A church leader may call poor financial reporting “trusting the ministry,” but Second Corinthians 8:20-21 shows concern for what is honorable not only before the Lord but also before men. A family may call material obsession “providing well,” but First Timothy 6:9-10 warns that those who desire to be rich fall into temptation and many harmful desires. Jesus’ own example in Matthew 4:1-11 shows that He refused shortcuts to glory, bread, recognition, or power when those shortcuts violated God’s Word. Therefore, a church that asks “What would Jesus do?” must teach members to identify the respectable names sin gives itself. The goal is not public image management but clean conduct before God, because Hebrews 4:13 says all things are naked and exposed to the eyes of Him to whom Christians must give account.

Family Life Under the Lordship of Christ

The challenge also transforms the church by transforming households, because discipleship cannot be confined to public meetings. Jesus honored the created order of marriage by referring back to Genesis, saying in Matthew 19:4-6 that the Creator made them male and female and joined husband and wife so that they become one flesh. This means Christian marriage is not a private arrangement governed by selfish desire but a covenantal union accountable to God. Ephesians 5:25 commands husbands to love their wives as Christ loved the congregation and gave Himself up for it, which destroys harshness, selfish control, neglect, and emotional laziness. Ephesians 5:22-24 calls wives to respectful submission in the Lord, which is not inferiority but ordered cooperation under God’s design. Ephesians 6:1-4 commands children to obey their parents in the Lord and fathers not to provoke their children to anger but to bring them up in the discipline and instruction of Jehovah. A church applying “What would Jesus do?” will teach husbands, wives, parents, and children how obedience looks at the dinner table, in conflict, in budgeting, in discipline, and in private speech. This is essential because a congregation cannot be spiritually healthy while its homes are governed by pride, resentment, passivity, and uncorrected sin.

In practical terms, the question must enter the ordinary moments that reveal the real condition of the heart. When a husband is irritated after work, he must ask whether Jesus would use weariness as permission for cutting words, or whether Colossians 4:6 requires speech that is gracious and seasoned with salt. When a wife is disappointed, she must ask whether Jesus would repay neglect with contempt, or whether First Peter 3:1-6 calls for conduct shaped by reverence and dignity. When parents correct children, they must ask whether Jesus would discipline in anger and humiliation, or whether Hebrews 12:10-11 shows discipline as purposeful instruction toward righteousness. When young people respond to parental authority, they must ask whether Jesus would excuse defiance, or whether Luke 2:51 records His submission to Joseph and Mary during His youth. When siblings quarrel, they must ask whether Jesus would feed resentment, or whether Matthew 5:23-24 teaches urgency in seeking peace when one has wronged another. A church that teaches these concrete applications will help families become training grounds for obedience rather than hiding places for hypocrisy. The point is not that families become flawless, because all are imperfect, but that the authority of Christ reaches the private places where character is actually formed.

Leadership That Follows the Shepherd

Church leadership is one of the first places the “What would Jesus do?” challenge must be applied, because leaders shape the spiritual climate of the congregation. First Peter 5:2-3 instructs elders to shepherd the flock of God willingly, not for shameful gain, and not domineering over those in their charge but being examples to the flock. This excludes leadership built on ego, intimidation, secrecy, favoritism, or the desire for applause. Jesus described Himself in John 10:11 as the good shepherd who lays down His life for the sheep, which means Christian leadership must be sacrificial, protective, truthful, and accountable to God. Elders must therefore know the congregation, guard sound doctrine, correct sin, comfort the discouraged, train servants, and refuse to turn ministry into personal possession. Titus 1:5-9 and First Timothy 3:1-7 give qualifications for elders and overseers that center on moral character, teaching ability, household management, and public reputation. These qualifications are not optional ideals but safeguards given by God for the protection of the congregation. A church that asks “What would Jesus do?” will not choose leaders because they are wealthy, charismatic, entertaining, socially connected, or forceful, but because they meet the biblical standard.

The same question also clarifies the roles of men and women in the congregation without embarrassment or compromise. First Timothy 2:12 does not permit a woman to teach or exercise authority over a man in the congregation, and First Timothy 3:1-13 presents overseer and ministerial servant qualifications in male terms connected to household leadership. This is not a statement of female inferiority, because men and women are both created in the image of God according to Genesis 1:27 and both receive salvation through Christ. It is a matter of divine order in congregational teaching and authority. Jesus honored women, taught women, defended women from unjust treatment, and included women among faithful disciples, as seen in Luke 10:38-42 and John 20:11-18. Yet He appointed male apostles, and the apostolic instructions preserve male leadership in the congregation. A faithful church will therefore encourage the full range of women’s biblical service while refusing to place women in pastoral or deacon-like offices that Scripture assigns to qualified men. Asking “What would Jesus do?” means honoring both His compassion and His order, not selecting whichever part is easier for the age to accept.

Holiness Without Isolation From Mission

The church must also learn that following Jesus requires separation from worldly conduct without withdrawal from evangelistic responsibility. John 17:15-18 records Jesus praying not that His disciples be taken out of the world but that they be kept from the evil one, and He then sends them into the world. This means Christians are not called to imitate the world, fear the world, or disappear from the world. They are to be morally distinct while actively bearing witness. First John 2:15-17 commands Christians not to love the world or the things in the world, because the desires of the flesh, the desires of the eyes, and the pride of life are not from the Father. In practice, this affects entertainment choices, speech patterns, clothing modesty, sexual conduct, online behavior, political anger, and the pursuit of status. A church that asks “What would Jesus do?” cannot excuse worldliness by calling it relevance. Jesus ate with tax collectors and sinners, as seen in Mark 2:15-17, but He did so as the physician calling sinners to repentance, not as a participant in their sin.

Holiness also requires careful congregational teaching about baptism, worship, and moral identity. Romans 6:3-4 links baptism with being united to Christ in His death and raised to walk in newness of life, which supports baptism by immersion as the fitting outward act for repentant believers. Infants cannot repent, believe, confess Christ, or submit knowingly to discipleship, so infant baptism does not match the apostolic pattern seen in Acts 2:38-41 and Acts 8:12. Worship must likewise be governed by truth, because John 4:24 says that God must be worshiped in spirit and truth. A church cannot ask “What would Jesus do?” and then design worship around entertainment, emotional manipulation, or the tastes of consumers. It must read Scripture, teach Scripture, pray in harmony with Scripture, sing truthfully, observe baptism correctly, remember Christ’s sacrifice with reverence, and train Christians to obey. Moral identity must also be grounded in creation and redemption, not in the passions of fallen humanity. First Corinthians 6:9-11 shows that some Christians had once practiced serious sins, but they were washed, sanctified, and justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of God through the message He inspired.

Courageous Compassion in a Confused Age

A 21st-century update of In His Steps must prepare the church to be both courageous and compassionate in an age that often calls righteousness harmful and sin liberating. Isaiah 5:20 warns against calling evil good and good evil, and that warning describes every age that rebels against God’s standards. Jesus never confused compassion with approval of sin. In John 8:11, after refusing to allow hypocritical accusers to misuse the situation, He told the woman to go and sin no more, uniting mercy with moral command. In Mark 10:21, Jesus looked at the rich man and loved him, yet He still told him to surrender the idol that controlled his heart. The church must learn this pattern because people harmed by sin need more than acceptance; they need truth that can lead them toward repentance, forgiveness, and life. A congregation that asks “What would Jesus do?” will not insult confused people, but neither will it affirm confusion as righteousness. It will speak with the patience of Second Timothy 2:24-26, correcting opponents with gentleness so that they may come to repentance and escape the snare of the devil.

Concrete courage is especially needed when biblical convictions become costly. A student may be mocked for refusing sexual immorality, but First Thessalonians 4:3-5 says God’s will is sanctification, that Christians abstain from sexual immorality and control their own bodies in holiness and honor. A worker may be pressured to celebrate wrongdoing, but Romans 12:2 commands Christians not to be conformed to this age but to be transformed by the renewing of the mind. A church may be tempted to soften teaching on repentance to keep attendance high, but Acts 20:27 records Paul saying that he did not shrink from declaring the whole counsel of God. Parents may fear that firm biblical instruction will make children resentful, but Deuteronomy 6:6-7 commands God’s words to be on the heart and taught diligently to children in daily life. Elders may fear conflict if they correct false teaching, but Jude 3 urges Christians to contend for the faith once for all delivered to the holy ones. These examples show that courage is not harshness; it is obedience when fear offers an easier path. Compassion without courage leaves people in danger, and courage without compassion misrepresents the Shepherd who came to save.

The Hope of the Kingdom and Eternal Life

The “What would Jesus do?” challenge must be connected to the kingdom hope Jesus proclaimed, because His example cannot be separated from His message. Matthew 6:33 commands disciples to seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness, which places God’s reign and standards above career, reputation, money, comfort, and human approval. Jesus taught His followers to pray in Matthew 6:10, “Let your kingdom come,” showing that the hope of God’s kingdom must shape Christian longing and obedience. This hope includes the return of Christ before His thousand-year reign, as Revelation 20:4-6 presents those who reign with Christ and the thousand years that follow. The righteous are not sustained by an immortal soul that naturally survives death, because Genesis 2:7 presents man as becoming a living soul, and Ezekiel 18:4 says the soul who sins shall die. Death is the cessation of personal life, and the biblical hope is resurrection, not natural immortality. John 5:28-29 says that those in the memorial tombs will hear the voice of the Son of God and come out, some to a resurrection of life and others to a resurrection of judgment. This doctrine gives urgency to evangelism, seriousness to holiness, and comfort to believers who trust the God who raises the dead.

A congregation transformed by this hope will not measure success by size, comfort, entertainment value, or social respectability. It will measure faithfulness by obedience to Christ, sound teaching, holy conduct, evangelistic effort, loving shepherding, and endurance in righteousness. Eternal life is a gift from God through Christ, as Romans 6:23 teaches, not something humans possess by nature. Gehenna represents eternal destruction, not endless conscious torment, because Matthew 10:28 says God can destroy both soul and body in Gehenna. Sheol and Hades refer to gravedom, the common condition of the dead, from which God can raise by His power. This understanding protects the church from sentimental funeral language and directs comfort toward the resurrection hope grounded in Christ’s own resurrection. First Corinthians 15:20-23 presents Christ as the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep, meaning His resurrection guarantees the resurrection hope for those who belong to Him. When the church asks “What would Jesus do?” it learns to live now in light of the kingdom, the resurrection, the judgment, and the promised future under Christ’s righteous rule.

A Congregational Practice, Not a Decorative Motto

The question must become a disciplined congregational practice rather than a bracelet, slogan, poster, or nostalgic reference to a Christian novel. The church can apply it in teaching by regularly connecting doctrine to obedience, so that every sermon asks what the passage requires believers to believe, reject, desire, say, and do. It can apply it in shepherding by helping members bring specific decisions under Scripture, such as whether to reconcile with a brother, end a corrupt habit, confess wrongdoing, change entertainment patterns, or begin evangelistic conversations. It can apply it in youth instruction by training young people to ask the question before peer pressure becomes strong, not after sin has already been excused. Psalm 119:9 asks how a young man can keep his way pure and answers, “By guarding it according to your word,” which gives the method plainly. It can apply it in church discipline by treating sin as spiritually dangerous and restoration as the goal when repentance is present. It can apply it in giving by teaching that money belongs under the lordship of Christ, as Second Corinthians 9:6-8 shows cheerful generosity joined to trust in God. It can apply it in conflict by requiring members to obey Matthew 5:23-24 and Matthew 18:15-17 rather than spreading offense through gossip, factions, or silent bitterness.

A practical 21st-century form of this challenge could be woven into the life of the congregation for a set period and then preserved as a permanent habit. Families could discuss one decision each week and ask how Jesus’ teaching answers it, such as how to speak to an enemy, how to respond to unfair criticism, how to use money, or how to show hospitality. Elders could guide the congregation through the Gospels, not merely to admire Jesus but to identify His commands, His responses, His priorities, and His view of Scripture. Small groups or Bible classes could examine real-life cases without naming private individuals, such as workplace dishonesty, online slander, sexual temptation, neglect of worship, fear of evangelism, or refusal to forgive. Teachers could show how Jesus answered temptation with written Scripture in Matthew 4:1-11, making that passage a model for resisting Satan and worldly pressure. Parents could help children memorize passages that answer common situations, such as Ephesians 4:29 for speech, Proverbs 15:1 for anger, and Philippians 2:14 for complaining. The congregation could make evangelism training normal rather than rare, preparing members to give a reason for their hope as First Peter 3:15 commands. In these ways, the question becomes more than an inspiring memory from In His Steps; it becomes a church-wide return to walking after the Son of God in obedient faith.

You May Also Enjoy

How Can Christians Guard the Heart in a Corrupt Generation?

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS