In answering the question raised in Are the Jewish People Still God’s Chosen People? and Under Christianity Are the Jews Still God’s Chosen People?, the biblical answer is no, not in the old-covenant sense of an ethnic nation standing in a uniquely chosen position before Jehovah apart from faith in Jesus Christ. Before the coming of the Messiah, the nation of Israel truly did occupy that covenant place. Jehovah chose Abraham, formed his descendants into a nation, gave them His Law, entrusted them with His worship, and separated them from the nations for His purpose in salvation history. Yet that chosen status was never an end in itself. It pointed forward to the coming of the promised Seed, the Messiah, through Whom Jehovah would bless people of all nations. Once Jesus Christ completed His earthly ministry, died, was raised, ascended to heaven, and inaugurated the New Covenant, the defining mark of God’s people was no longer physical descent from Abraham but union with Christ through faith. After the ascension, the question is not whether one is Jewish by birth, but whether one belongs to the Messiah.

Israel’s Chosen Status Under the Old Covenant

The Old Testament leaves no doubt that Israel was Jehovah’s chosen nation under the Mosaic covenant. Exodus 19:5-6 identifies Israel as His treasured possession among all peoples, and Deuteronomy 7:6 says that Jehovah chose them out of all the peoples on the face of the earth. This choice was real, historical, and covenantal. Israel received the Law, the temple service, the promises, the patriarchs, and the messianic line. Paul confirms this in Romans 9:4-5, where he acknowledges Israel’s extraordinary privileges. No faithful reader of Scripture can deny that the Jewish people once stood in a uniquely chosen national relationship to Jehovah.

At the same time, the Old Testament itself shows that chosenness by nation did not guarantee individual salvation or permanent covenant security regardless of obedience. Israel repeatedly broke covenant, hardened itself, and suffered judgment. The prophets constantly distinguished between the nation outwardly considered and the faithful remnant within it. Elijah’s day is one example, and Isaiah repeatedly speaks of a remnant that would return. Therefore, even under the Old Covenant, Jehovah’s dealings with Israel already showed that mere ethnic descent was never enough to secure His approval. Circumcision of the flesh could exist without circumcision of the heart, and covenant privilege could be despised through unbelief. This matters greatly, because the New Testament does not introduce an entirely foreign principle. It brings to fulfillment what the Old Testament had already anticipated: Jehovah’s approval rests on faith and obedience, not on ancestry alone.

The Abrahamic promise itself pointed beyond ethnic Israel as a closed national entity. Genesis 12:3 declared that in Abraham all the families of the earth would be blessed. Paul explains in Galatians 3 that the promise reached its fulfillment in Christ, the singular Seed, and that those who belong to Christ are Abraham’s offspring and heirs according to promise. That means the line of promise culminates in the Messiah, and participation in the promise comes through Him. Israel’s chosen role, therefore, was preparatory, historical, and messianic. The nation was chosen as the vessel through which the Christ would come and through which the Scriptures and covenant history would be preserved, but that role moved toward fulfillment, not perpetual ethnic exclusivity.

Jesus Exposed the False Security of Ethnic Privilege

During His earthly ministry, Jesus repeatedly confronted the false confidence that many in Israel had placed in physical descent from Abraham. In Matthew 3:9, John the Baptist warned the Jews not to say within themselves that they had Abraham as their father, because Jehovah could raise up children for Abraham from stones. That was an early warning that covenant identity was not secured by bloodline. Jesus Himself intensified that warning. In John 8, He showed that those who claimed Abraham as their father could not truly be Abraham’s children while rejecting the One sent by God. Their physical lineage could not cancel their spiritual rebellion.

Jesus also made clear that the kingdom privileges entrusted to Israel would not remain with an unbelieving nation. Matthew 21:43 is decisive: “the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a nation producing its fruits.” That statement was directed to Jewish religious leaders who represented a people privileged by covenant history yet hardened against their own Messiah. Jesus did not say that ethnic descent would continue to guarantee covenant standing after His mission was complete. He declared that the kingdom would be removed from those who refused Him and given to a fruit-bearing people. That fruit-bearing people is not another ethnic nation replacing the Jews as a different race. It is the messianic people formed around Christ, consisting of Jews and Gentiles who believe.

This same truth appears in Jesus’ lament over Jerusalem in Matthew 23:37-39. He exposed the nation’s long pattern of resistance to Jehovah’s messengers and its unwillingness to receive Him. The problem was not that Jehovah failed Israel, but that Israel in large measure rejected Jehovah’s Messiah. Jesus came first to “the lost sheep of the house of Israel,” and the apostles later proclaimed the gospel “to the Jew first.” Yet privilege increased responsibility. When the Messiah was rejected, covenant history reached a judicial turning point. The question after that point was no longer whether Israel had once been chosen, but whether Israel would receive the Christ in Whom all the promises of God find their Yes.

The Ascension, Pentecost, and the Opening of the Congregation

Jesus’ ascension is critical to this question because it marks the completion of His earthly mission and the transition to His heavenly reign. Before His ascension, He had already established the basis of the New Covenant in His sacrificial death and resurrection. At the ascension, He entered into heavenly glory, and from there He poured out the Holy Spirit at Pentecost in fulfillment of His promise. Acts 2 is not a small footnote in redemptive history. It marks the public formation of the New Covenant congregation under the exalted Christ. From that point onward, God’s people are visibly constituted around the enthroned Messiah, not around the temple system, not around the Levitical order, and not around ethnic descent.

At first, that congregation was Jewish, which is fitting because salvation history moves from promise to fulfillment within Israel before expanding openly to the nations. The earliest believers were Jews. The apostles were Jews. Thousands converted in Jerusalem were Jews. This shows continuity, but it does not prove that ethnic Israel as such remained the chosen nation. It proves that the true continuation of God’s people began with Jewish believers who accepted Jesus as the Messiah. The dividing line was already present: believing Jews entered the messianic congregation; unbelieving Jews remained outside it. From the start, covenant identity was Christ-centered, not ethnicity-centered.

Acts 10 then widens the matter decisively with Cornelius. Peter confesses in Acts 10:34-35 that Jehovah shows no partiality, but in every nation the person who fears Him and does what is right is acceptable to Him. This is a foundational moment. If ethnic Jewish identity still functioned as the decisive covenant marker after the ascension, Peter could not have spoken that way. Instead, Jehovah demonstrated that Gentiles who believe in Christ are received without becoming Jews. Then Acts 13:46 records Paul and Barnabas telling resistant Jews that since they rejected the word of God and judged themselves unworthy of everlasting life, the mission would turn to the Gentiles. That does not erase the priority the Jews had in redemptive history, but it does prove that after the ascension covenant privilege no longer belongs to the Jewish people as a nation apart from Christ.

The New Covenant Redefined the People of God

Hebrews 8 is one of the clearest passages on this issue. The writer states that Jesus mediates a better covenant and that in speaking of a new covenant, God made the first obsolete. If the Mosaic covenant that defined Israel as a separated covenant nation has become obsolete in the presence of the New Covenant, then ethnic Israel cannot continue to function as Jehovah’s chosen covenant people on the old basis. The covenant order that once marked them out has been fulfilled and set aside in Christ. Chosenness is now inseparably tied to the Mediator of the New Covenant.

Paul explains the same truth from another angle in Galatians 3. Those of faith are sons of Abraham. In Christ there is neither Jew nor Greek with respect to covenant standing, and if you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s offspring, heirs according to promise. The force of Paul’s argument is unmistakable. He does not say that Jews remain heirs by birth while Gentiles receive a secondary blessing. He says that inheritance comes through Christ, and all who are in Christ share equally in the Abrahamic promise. The old wall of distinction has been removed as a covenant barrier.

Ephesians 2:11-22 makes this even more explicit. Gentiles who were once strangers to the covenants of promise have been brought near by the blood of Christ. Jesus made both groups one, broke down the dividing wall, and created in Himself one new man. Paul does not describe two parallel peoples of God, one Jewish and one Gentile, traveling on separate covenant tracks. He describes one reconciled body. Gentile believers become fellow citizens, members of God’s household, and part of a holy temple. That is why the New Testament never teaches that unbelieving ethnic Israel remains God’s chosen people while the church is merely an additional people alongside them. Rather, the church, meaning the congregation of all believers in Christ, is the present covenant people of God.

This is confirmed in 1 Peter 2:9, where Peter applies to believers language once given to Israel: a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for God’s own possession. Peter writes to a body made up of believers who now possess covenant identity in Christ. The language is not left suspended over unbelieving ethnic Israel as though nothing changed after the ascension. It is consciously applied to the Christian congregation. Verse 10 adds force to the point: once they were not a people, but now they are God’s people. The covenant titles once attached to Israel under the Old Covenant are now centered in the New Covenant people united to the Messiah.

Romans 9–11 Does Not Reestablish Ethnic Chosenness Apart From Christ

Many appeal to Romans 9–11 as though these chapters restore ethnic Israel to an ongoing chosen status apart from faith in Christ. That reading fails to follow Paul’s argument. Romans 9:6 opens with a controlling statement: “not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel.” That sentence destroys the simplistic idea that physical descent equals covenant identity. Paul immediately distinguishes between children of the flesh and children of the promise. From the outset, he is teaching that true Israel is defined by God’s promise and response of faith, not by ancestry alone.

Romans 10 continues the same line. Israel, pursuing righteousness through law rather than through faith in Christ, stumbled over the stumbling stone. Paul’s burden is not that Israel lost political prominence; his burden is that many Jews did not submit to the righteousness of God in Christ. Romans 10:12 explicitly says there is no distinction between Jew and Greek, for the same Lord is Lord of all. That is the present reality after the ascension. There is one Lord, one gospel, one way of salvation, one people of God gathered through faith in Christ. Any doctrine that gives ethnic Jews a covenant standing apart from that gospel contradicts Paul’s argument.

Romans 11 must be read within that framework. Paul first says that God has not rejected His people completely, because there is a remnant according to grace. Paul himself is proof, and so are all Jewish believers. This is crucial. Jehovah has not cast off every Jew. Jewish people can and do become part of God’s people through faith in Christ. But that is very different from saying that the Jewish nation as an unbelieving ethnic body remains chosen in the old-covenant sense. Paul’s olive tree imagery confirms this. Natural branches were broken off because of unbelief, and Gentiles stand only by faith. Jewish branches can be grafted in again, but only if they do not continue in unbelief. Therefore, even the restoration Paul discusses is Christ-centered and faith-conditioned, not ethnically automatic.

Paul’s statement that all Israel will be saved does not overturn this. It does not teach that all ethnic Jews, regardless of faith, remain God’s chosen people. Romans 11 nowhere teaches salvation apart from Christ. The phrase is best understood in harmony with the whole argument of Romans 9–11: the fullness of God’s saving purpose for Israel is realized in the remnant of believing Jews together with the totality of God’s redeemed people in Christ, or, at minimum, in Jews who are saved only by turning to Christ, never by ancestry alone. In either case, the text does not support the claim that ethnic Jewish identity after Jesus’ ascension remains the present marker of Jehovah’s chosen people. Paul’s entire argument moves in the opposite direction.

The Church Inherits Covenant Identity in Christ

The church does not become God’s people by stealing promises from Israel. The church becomes God’s people because Jesus Christ is the fulfillment of the promises, and all who are in Him share in what those promises were always moving toward. This is fulfillment, not theft; completion, not confusion. The same God Who chose Israel also sent the Messiah through Israel, and in the Messiah He formed one people from Jews and Gentiles. Therefore, the church is not an afterthought. It is the revealed New Covenant congregation in which Jehovah’s purpose for Israel and the nations reaches its intended goal.

This is one reason Dispensationalism fails at this point. It insists on a sharp and continuing covenant distinction between Israel and the church that the apostolic writings do not maintain in the present age. Paul says Gentiles are fellow heirs, members of the same body, and sharers in the promise in Christ Jesus through the gospel. The apostles do not preach two covenant peoples with two different standings before God. They preach one flock under one Shepherd, one body under one Head, one access to the Father through Christ. The old covenant nation has given way to the New Covenant congregation.

This means that when the New Testament assigns covenant titles to believers, it is making a theological declaration of the highest importance. Believers are Abraham’s seed in Christ. Believers are God’s household. Believers are the holy nation. Believers are the circumcision, as Philippians 3:3 teaches. These are not ornamental expressions. They define where covenant identity now rests. After Jesus’ ascension, the covenant center is no longer Sinai, no longer the temple, no longer national descent, and no longer old-covenant boundary markers. The covenant center is the exalted Christ.

What This Means for Jewish People Today

The biblical answer that the Jewish people are no longer God’s chosen people in the old-covenant national sense must never be twisted into contempt for Jewish people. Paul rejects such arrogance in Romans 11. Christians owe a profound debt to the Jewish patriarchs, prophets, apostles, and above all to the Jewish Messiah according to the flesh. The gospel came historically through Israel. The Scriptures came through Israel. The earliest congregation was Jewish. Therefore, any smug or hostile posture toward Jewish people is sinful and contrary to the apostolic spirit.

At the same time, love requires clarity. Jewish people today are in the same position as all other people with respect to salvation: they must come to the Father through Jesus Christ. John 14:6 leaves no other way. Acts 4:12 leaves no other name. Romans 3:29-30 teaches one God justifying both Jew and Gentile through faith. Therefore, the notion that the Jewish people remain Jehovah’s chosen people simply by ancestry after Jesus’ ascension is not a biblical doctrine. Jewish people may certainly become part of God’s chosen people, but they do so in the same way Gentiles do, by repentance and faith in the Messiah. There is no separate covenant track, no ethnic exemption, and no old-covenant chosenness continuing apart from Christ.

This is why Modern Israel in Bible Prophecy: Are the Natural Jews Today Still God’s Chosen People? presses an important point. The decisive issue is not bloodline, national existence, or modern political developments. The decisive issue is one’s relationship to Jesus Christ. A Jewish person who rejects Christ is not inside God’s chosen covenant people merely because he is a descendant of Abraham. A Gentile who believes in Christ is not a second-class outsider. In the present age, the dividing line is the Messiah Himself.

The result is plain. Before Christ’s completed work, the Jewish nation stood in a unique chosen relationship under the Old Covenant. After Jesus’ death, resurrection, ascension, and the establishment of the New Covenant congregation, that national chosenness no longer defines the people of God. God’s chosen people now consist of all who are in Christ, whether Jew or Gentile. Jewish believers retain their heritage, and their salvation glorifies Jehovah’s faithfulness to His promises. Jewish unbelievers, however, do not remain God’s chosen people on the basis of ancestry. After the ascension, chosenness is Christological, covenantal, and faith-defined. The Jewish people as an ethnic body are no longer God’s chosen people in the old sense; the people of God are now the one body of believers united to Jesus Christ.

Excursus: Romans 9–11 and the Question of Whether God Rejected the Jewish People

Romans 9–11 is frequently cited as proof that the Jewish people remain God’s chosen people as a nation regardless of their acceptance or rejection of Jesus Christ. Many interpreters isolate Paul’s question in Romans 11:1, “Has God rejected His people? May it never be!” and treat it as if Paul were declaring that ethnic Israel continues as God’s covenant people in an ongoing, unconditional sense. Such an interpretation fails to follow the actual flow of Paul’s argument across these three chapters and ignores the broader teaching of the New Testament concerning the New Covenant. When the passage is interpreted in its full context, Paul is not defending the idea that the Jewish nation remains God’s chosen covenant people apart from Christ. Instead, he is defending the truth that Jehovah has not rejected every Jew, because Jewish people can still become part of God’s people through faith in the Messiah.

The discussion begins earlier than Romans 11. In Romans 9:6 Paul establishes the controlling principle that governs the entire section: “not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel.” This statement immediately dismantles the assumption that physical descent from Abraham automatically defines membership among God’s covenant people. Paul distinguishes between Israel according to the flesh and Israel according to the promise. He then illustrates this principle with Old Testament examples. Ishmael was Abraham’s physical son but not the child of the promise; Isaac was the child through whom the promise continued. Esau was the older son of Isaac, yet Jacob was the one through whom the covenant line advanced. Paul’s argument shows that covenant identity has never been determined merely by genealogy. Even within the patriarchal family, Jehovah’s dealings revealed a distinction between physical descent and covenant participation.

This principle continues into Romans 10, where Paul describes Israel’s present condition in the first century. The problem is not that Jehovah arbitrarily rejected the Jewish people. The problem is that many within Israel pursued righteousness through the Law rather than through faith in Christ. Romans 10:3 states that they sought to establish their own righteousness and therefore did not submit to the righteousness of God. Paul identifies Jesus as the culmination of the Law for righteousness to everyone who believes. This means the covenant goal of the Law points directly to Christ. When Israel rejected Him, they rejected the very fulfillment of the covenant structure they had been given.

The climax of the argument comes in Romans 11. Paul begins by asking, “Has God rejected His people?” His answer, “May it never be,” must be interpreted according to the explanation he immediately provides. Paul does not say that ethnic Israel continues as a chosen nation in unbelief. Instead, he points to himself as evidence that God has not rejected the Jewish people entirely. Paul was a Jew, a descendant of Abraham from the tribe of Benjamin, yet he became a follower of Christ. His existence proves that Jewish people are not excluded from salvation. This is the point Paul is making. God has not rejected every Jew. Jewish individuals can still enter the New Covenant through faith in the Messiah.

Paul reinforces this with the concept of a remnant. In Romans 11:5 he writes, “So too at the present time there is a remnant according to grace.” The idea of a remnant was deeply rooted in Israel’s history. During periods of widespread national unfaithfulness, Jehovah preserved a smaller group within the nation who remained faithful to Him. Paul illustrates this with the example of Elijah, when thousands of Israelites had turned to idolatry but Jehovah preserved seven thousand who had not bowed the knee to Baal. The significance of this example is critical. The remnant concept proves that God’s faithfulness to Israel never required the salvation of every Israelite. Even in the Old Testament, God’s true people within Israel consisted of a faithful minority rather than the entire ethnic nation. Paul applies the same principle to the first century: the Jewish believers in Christ constituted the remnant that demonstrated God had not rejected His people entirely.

The olive tree illustration further clarifies the matter. In Romans 11:17–24 Paul describes Israel as natural branches of an olive tree, while Gentile believers are wild branches grafted into it. Many interpreters misunderstand this imagery and assume it teaches that the Jewish people remain permanently attached to the tree regardless of belief. Yet Paul explicitly states the opposite. Natural branches were broken off because of unbelief. This means ethnic connection to Abraham did not guarantee continued participation in God’s covenant people. Jewish individuals who rejected Christ were removed from the covenant structure symbolized by the tree.

Gentile believers were grafted into that same tree through faith. The tree itself does not represent ethnic Israel as a political or national entity. Rather, it represents the historical people of God rooted in the Abrahamic promise and fulfilled in Christ. Gentiles who believe in Christ are grafted into that covenant heritage, becoming heirs of the promise. However, Paul warns Gentile believers not to become arrogant, because they stand only by faith. Just as unbelieving Jewish branches were removed, Gentile branches could also be removed if they abandoned faith. The defining factor is therefore belief in Christ, not ancestry.

Paul also explains that Jewish branches can be grafted back into the tree if they abandon unbelief. This point is crucial. The possibility of restoration demonstrates that Jewish identity does not automatically secure covenant standing. If ethnic Israel were still permanently chosen as a nation regardless of faith, there would be no need for branches to be grafted back in. The condition for restoration is explicit: they must not continue in unbelief. Therefore, Paul’s teaching does not support the idea of an ongoing chosen status for Israel apart from Christ. It emphasizes that Jewish people, like Gentiles, must believe in the Messiah to participate in God’s covenant people.

The phrase often cited in this debate is Romans 11:26, where Paul writes that “all Israel will be saved.” This statement must be interpreted in harmony with the preceding argument and with the broader teaching of Scripture. Paul has already stated that not all who descend from Israel belong to Israel. He has also emphasized that salvation comes only through faith in Christ. Therefore, “all Israel” cannot mean that every ethnic Jew is automatically saved or that the Jewish nation retains a chosen status regardless of faith. Rather, the phrase refers to the completion of God’s saving purpose concerning Israel, which includes the remnant of Jewish believers together with the full number of God’s redeemed people in Christ. Every Jew who is saved will be saved through the Messiah, not through ethnic identity or adherence to the old covenant system.

This interpretation fits perfectly with the rest of the New Testament. The apostles consistently taught that Jesus Christ is the only mediator of salvation. Acts 4:12 states plainly that there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved. This applies equally to Jews and Gentiles. The gospel message proclaimed in the apostolic era did not present Judaism as an alternative covenant path to God. Instead, the apostles called Jewish listeners to repent and believe in Jesus as the promised Messiah. Thousands of Jews responded to that call and became part of the early Christian congregation, while others rejected it and remained outside the New Covenant.

The apostle John addressed this rejection in unmistakable terms. In 1 John 2:22 he wrote, “Who is the liar but the one who denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is the antichrist, the one who denies the Father and the Son.” John was speaking within the context of the first-century conflict surrounding Jesus’ identity. Many Jewish leaders rejected the claim that Jesus was the Messiah. John explained that denying the Son is equivalent to denying the Father. According to the apostle, such rejection places a person in opposition to Christ. The issue therefore becomes Christological, not ethnic. Anyone who denies Jesus as the Messiah stands outside the covenant relationship with God, regardless of ancestry.

The historical events surrounding Jesus’ crucifixion reinforce this theological reality. Jesus came first to the Jewish people, fulfilling the promises made to the patriarchs. The apostles began their preaching in Jerusalem and consistently offered the gospel to Jews before turning to the Gentiles in wider mission efforts. Yet the New Testament records repeated instances in which Jewish leaders rejected the message and persecuted those who proclaimed it. Acts 13:46 records Paul and Barnabas telling Jewish audiences that since they rejected the word of God and judged themselves unworthy of everlasting life, the missionaries would turn to the Gentiles. This shift did not represent God abandoning His promises. Instead, it revealed that covenant participation now depended on acceptance of the Messiah.

Therefore, Paul’s statement in Romans 11:1 must be understood correctly. When he says that God has not rejected His people, he means that Jewish people are not excluded from salvation and that Jehovah continues to save Jews who believe in Christ. Paul himself was the clearest example of this reality. The presence of Jewish believers in the early congregation proved that God had not utterly cast off the descendants of Abraham. However, the same passage also shows that unbelieving Jews were removed from the covenant people and could only return through faith in Christ. The covenant structure itself had shifted from the Mosaic system to the New Covenant mediated by Jesus.

This interpretation harmonizes Romans 9–11 with the rest of Paul’s teaching. In Galatians 3 Paul declares that those who belong to Christ are Abraham’s offspring and heirs according to promise. In Ephesians 2 he explains that Christ has made Jews and Gentiles into one body, removing the dividing wall between them. The people of God are no longer defined by ethnic descent or adherence to the Mosaic Law but by faith in the Messiah. The New Covenant community consists of all who are united to Christ.

Consequently, Romans 11 does not support the claim that the Jewish nation remains God’s chosen people apart from Christ. Instead, it explains how Jewish individuals can still become part of God’s people through faith in Him. God did not reject every Jew, but neither did He preserve a national covenant standing for those who reject the Messiah. The decisive issue after the ascension of Jesus is not ethnicity but allegiance to Christ. Jews and Gentiles alike enter God’s covenant people only through repentance and faith in the Son of God.

You May Also Enjoy

Dispensationalism: An Apologetic Exposition and Biblical Rejection

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS