Is Mary the Mother of God (Theotokos)?

Please Help Us Keep These Thousands of Blog Posts Growing and Free for All

$5.00

THE EVANGELISM HANDBOOK

The Biblical Data for What Mary Is Called

Scripture speaks with clarity about Mary’s role in Jehovah’s saving purpose without expanding her identity beyond what the text authorizes. Mary is repeatedly identified as the mother of Jesus, the Messiah, and the Son of God. Matthew records the angel’s message to Joseph: “She will give birth to a son, and you are to name Him Jesus, for He will save His people from their sins.” (Matthew 1:21) Luke likewise records Gabriel’s words to Mary: “You will conceive in your womb and give birth to a son, and you will name Him Jesus. He will be great and will be called Son of the Most High.” (Luke 1:31-32) When Elizabeth greets Mary, she says, “How has it happened to me that the mother of my Lord should come to me?” (Luke 1:43) This is as high as the biblical language rises with reference to Mary: mother of Jesus, mother of “my Lord” (a title for the Messiah and rightful King), and the woman through whom the Son of God entered the human family. Scripture does not use the term Theotokos, and it does not call Mary “mother of God.”

At the same time, the Bible does present Jesus as uniquely more than a mere man. He is the preexistent Son who came from Heaven to do His Father’s will. Jesus Himself says, “I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will but the will of Him who sent me.” (John 6:38) John states, “The Word became flesh and dwelled among us.” (John 1:14) Paul says Jehovah “sent His Son, who was born of a woman.” (Galatians 4:4) Mary is therefore the mother of Jesus in His genuine humanity, the real, historical mother of the incarnate Son in the sense the text uses: she carried Him, gave birth to Him, and raised Him as His earthly mother (Luke 2:6-7; Luke 2:51).

What Theotokos Tries to Protect and Why It Became Controversial

The term Theotokos (“God-bearer” or “the one who gave birth to God”) emerged in later doctrinal controversy as a protective fence around a truth Christians rightly defend: Jesus is one Person, not two separable persons, and His identity is not divided between “a human Jesus” and “a divine Son” living alongside each other. Scripture presents Jesus as one “Christ” who is truly human and truly the Son sent from the Father, acting as a unified Person in history. John can say, “The Word became flesh,” not that the Word merely inhabited flesh (John 1:14). Paul can say the Son was “born of a woman,” not that a separate human person was born while the Son only observed (Galatians 4:4). The desire to confess the unity of Christ is sound, because the gospel rests on who Jesus is and what He truly did as the one Mediator (1 Timothy 2:5).

Yet the controversy arises because Theotokos, as a slogan, can be heard as if Mary is the origin or source of Deity, or as if Jehovah’s eternal existence is dependent on a human mother. Scripture will not allow that. Jehovah is eternal and uncreated: “Before the mountains were born, or You brought forth the earth and the productive land, from eternity to eternity You are God.” (Psalm 90:2) Jehovah declares, “I am the First and I am the Last. There is no God but me.” (Isaiah 44:6) No human being can be said to generate, produce, or originate God. Mary did not bring Jehovah into existence. She did not give origin to the Father. She did not give origin to the Holy Spirit. She is not the fountain of Deity.

So the question becomes one of meaning and boundaries. If someone uses Theotokos merely to say, “The One Mary bore is truly the Messiah and the Son of God, not a split or divided Christ,” that intention seeks to guard something biblical about Christ’s unity. But if Theotokos is used to elevate Mary into a quasi-divine role, to encourage prayer to her, to present her as a mediator, or to imply she is mother of Deity in an absolute sense, then it crosses into concepts Scripture does not teach and practices Scripture does not authorize.

Why Scripture Does Not Support Calling Mary “Mother of God”

The most direct biblical reason is that Scripture itself never uses such a title, even though it freely honors Mary as blessed among women (Luke 1:42) and acknowledges her unique role. The Bible is not shy about giving honor where honor is due, yet it does not give Mary divine titles. Mary herself directs attention away from self-exaltation and toward Jehovah’s mercy: “My soul exalts Jehovah, and my spirit has rejoiced in God my Savior.” (Luke 1:46-47) Notice that Mary calls Jehovah her Savior. That alone is decisive against any theology that treats Mary as inherently sinless, inherently exalted, or functioning as a necessary channel of salvation. Mary stands with the rest of humanity as one who needs saving mercy from Jehovah.

Further, Jesus consistently teaches that ultimate spiritual privilege is not grounded in biological connection to Him but in obedience to Jehovah’s Word. When a woman cries out, “Blessed is the womb that carried You and the breasts at which You nursed,” Jesus replies, “No, rather, blessed are those who hear the word of God and keep it.” (Luke 11:27-28) Jesus honors Mary appropriately, but He refuses any shift toward veneration that would misplace devotion.

Scripture also guards the uniqueness of Christ’s mediatorship. “There is one God and one mediator between God and men, a man, Christ Jesus.” (1 Timothy 2:5) If Mary is called “Mother of God” in a way that promotes devotion, prayer, or reliance upon her as an intercessor by office, that practice collides with the biblical insistence that access is through the Son and that prayer is offered to the Father through Jesus’ name (John 14:13-14; John 16:23-24). Christians honor Mary by honoring Jehovah’s work in her life and by imitating her faith and submission, not by assigning her roles Scripture reserves for Christ.

A Biblically Accurate Way to Speak About Mary and Christ

A careful biblical formulation keeps three truths together without confusion. First, Mary is truly the mother of Jesus according to the flesh, because Jesus truly became human and was born of her (Matthew 1:18-25; Luke 2:6-7; Galatians 4:4). Second, the One born of Mary is truly the Messiah and the Son of God, sent from the Father and preexistent before His human birth (John 3:16-17; John 6:38; John 17:5). Third, Mary is not the origin of Deity and must not be treated as a mediator, object of prayer, or recipient of religious veneration, because Jehovah alone is God and Jesus alone is Mediator (Isaiah 42:8; 1 Timothy 2:5).

It is therefore safest and most faithful to Scripture to speak as the Bible speaks: Mary is “the mother of Jesus” (John 2:1; Acts 1:14), “the mother of my Lord” in the messianic sense (Luke 1:43), and a faithful servant used by Jehovah in the coming of the Messiah (Luke 1:38). If someone insists on using Theotokos, it must be fenced with strict biblical definitions so that it does not imply that Mary generated God or deserves devotion. The Bible’s own terminology remains the best guardrail, because it honors Christ fully and honors Mary rightly without crossing into unbiblical elevation.

You May Also Enjoy

What Is Marianismo, and Why Must Christians Reject It?

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑

Discover more from Christian Publishing House Blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading