Why Could Joseph Not See the King in Genesis 50:4–5?

CPH LOGO Founded 2005 - 03

Please Help Us Keep These Thousands of Blog Posts Growing and Free for All

$5.00

Genesis 50:4–5 states: “When the days of weeping for him had passed, Joseph spoke to Pharaoh’s household, saying: ‘If I have found favor in your eyes, please convey this message to Pharaoh: My father made me swear, saying: “Look! I am dying. You are to bury me in my burial place that I have excavated for myself in the land of Canaan.” Now, please let me go up and bury my father, and then return.’”

This passage raises an interesting question—why did Joseph, Pharaoh’s second-in-command, not approach the king directly but instead communicate through Pharaoh’s household? Given Joseph’s prominence in Egypt, one would expect him to have direct access. The answer lies in understanding the cultural, religious, and political dynamics of ancient Egypt.

What Restricted Joseph’s Access to Pharaoh?

  1. Ritual Purity Laws in Egypt
    The most likely reason Joseph could not see Pharaoh directly was that he was considered ritually unclean due to his mourning for Jacob. Egyptian customs regarding death and mourning were highly rigid, and those who came into contact with a dead body were deemed impure. The mourning process involved specific rituals, such as fasting, wearing sackcloth, and abstaining from normal social interactions.

    Egyptian religious beliefs held that death was associated with impurity. Anyone involved in burial practices was considered defiled for a period of time, making them unfit to enter sacred or royal spaces. Since Pharaoh was regarded as a divine figure, strict purity laws governed who could appear before him. Joseph, having personally handled his father’s embalming and mourning rites, would have been required to complete a purification period before entering Pharaoh’s presence.

  2. Court Etiquette and Protocol
    Even though Joseph held a high governmental position, there were still strict rules governing access to Pharaoh. Ancient Egyptian kings were surrounded by layers of bureaucracy and intermediaries. High officials often had to petition the royal court through designated channels rather than directly approaching the king.

    This practice is evident in Egyptian inscriptions and records that describe the hierarchical nature of the royal court. Courtiers, royal scribes, and high-ranking officials functioned as intermediaries, presenting petitions on behalf of individuals. This ensured that only those deemed appropriate could have a direct audience with Pharaoh.

    Joseph, despite his authority, likely followed these established protocols. By addressing Pharaoh’s household rather than Pharaoh himself, he adhered to the expected administrative structure.

  3. Political Considerations and Perception
    While Joseph was Pharaoh’s most trusted advisor, he was still a Hebrew and a foreigner in Egypt. Although he had risen to power, there were likely limitations to how much informal access he had to Pharaoh. Given that he was requesting permission to leave Egypt temporarily, it was diplomatic to present his petition through intermediaries rather than risk any perception of overstepping his position.

    Additionally, by going through Pharaoh’s household, Joseph may have ensured that his request was framed in a favorable way. Since his absence could have had political and economic implications, it was crucial that the request was properly conveyed to avoid any misunderstanding.

Why Did Joseph Swear an Oath to Jacob Regarding Burial in Canaan?

Genesis 50:5 recounts Joseph stating: “My father made me swear, saying: ‘Look! I am dying. You are to bury me in my burial place that I have excavated for myself in the land of Canaan.’” This oath underscores the deep significance Jacob placed on being buried in Canaan rather than Egypt.

  1. Covenantal Significance
    Jacob’s burial in Canaan was directly tied to JHVH’s covenant with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. JHVH had promised them the land of Canaan as an everlasting possession (Genesis 15:18–21; 26:3–4; 28:13–15). By insisting on burial in Canaan, Jacob reaffirmed his faith in JHVH’s promise.

  2. Separation from Egyptian Culture
    Although Jacob and his family had lived in Egypt for 17 years (Genesis 47:28), he did not want to be permanently associated with the land. His burial in Canaan symbolized the distinct identity of the Israelites, setting them apart from Egyptian customs and ensuring that future generations would see themselves as belonging to the Promised Land.

  3. Family Tradition and Honor
    The Cave of Machpelah in Canaan was a burial site of great importance to the patriarchs. Abraham, Sarah, Isaac, Rebekah, and Leah were buried there (Genesis 49:29–32). By joining them in burial, Jacob upheld family honor and continuity.

How Did Pharaoh Respond to Joseph’s Request?

Genesis 50:6 records Pharaoh’s response: “Go and bury your father, just as he made you swear.” Pharaoh granted permission, demonstrating his continued respect for Joseph. This approval also reflects Pharaoh’s recognition of the importance of honoring oaths, even those made by foreigners.

Pharaoh’s willingness to release Joseph temporarily suggests that Joseph had maintained his favor and influence despite being in mourning. It also indicates that Pharaoh saw no political threat in allowing a large Egyptian entourage to accompany Joseph to Canaan for the burial (Genesis 50:7–9).

Conclusion

Joseph’s indirect approach to Pharaoh in Genesis 50:4–5 was likely due to Egyptian purity laws, strict court protocols, and political considerations. Having participated in mourning rites, Joseph would have been considered ritually impure, making direct access to Pharaoh inappropriate. Instead, he followed the proper administrative procedures, ensuring that his request was formally presented through the royal household.

Jacob’s burial request was deeply rooted in his faith in JHVH’s promises, his desire to maintain the Israelites’ distinct identity, and the importance of family burial traditions. Pharaoh’s approval of Joseph’s request underscores the respect Joseph commanded and the significance of honoring sworn oaths.

You May Also Enjoy

What Is the Meaning of the Scepter and the Commander’s Staff in Genesis 49:10?

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑

Discover more from Christian Publishing House Blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading