Please Help Us Keep These Thousands of Blog Posts Growing and Free for All

$5.00

Many voices in modern theology and biblical studies argue that unshakable confidence is unattainable in our present age. They question the validity of standing firmly on doctrines and insist that faith should be viewed through the lens of uncertainty. Yet the Scriptures and reason alike testify to the value and possibility of genuine certainty. Biblical apologetics need not be mired in endless speculation, nor must believers shy away from categorical claims of truth. This discussion explores the nature of certainty from a Christian vantage point while drawing on God’s Word and carefully considering the historical-grammatical method of interpretation. Certainty is neither intellectual presumption nor arrogant dogmatism; rather, it flows naturally from a robust conviction that God has spoken, that Christ has risen, and that His Word is trustworthy. The biblical text, read in its straightforward sense, stands as an anchor for the believer, providing bedrock assurances that transcend the fickle climate of skepticism.

The Necessity of Certainty in Christian Apologetics

Christian apologetics is more than a mere defense of biblical texts; it is a proclamation that God has revealed Himself in human history. Just as a mathematical proposition can be known with logical certainty, many biblical truths can be acknowledged and defended with moral or practical certainty, and even spiritual certainty where God’s revelation undergirds the believer’s convictions. When 1 Corinthians 15:14 states, “if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain and your faith is in vain,” it does not present a milquetoast proposition. It underscores that the risen Christ is the decisive factor. If Jesus is actually risen, our faith is not guesswork but factual, an objective historical event.

In an era where many scholars speak of “uncertainty,” the Christian apologist must remember that the historical resurrection is testified by multiple eyewitnesses (1 Corinthians 15:6) and recorded in documents that reflect careful detail. Luke 1:3 emphasizes the importance of compiling accounts “accurately from the beginning.” The writer was evidently certain about the events he narrated. The resurrection event—occurring in 33 C.E.—wasn’t a vague supposition but something to which the apostles bore living testimony. The apostle Peter urged believers always to be “ready to make a defense” (1 Peter 3:15) based on factual reality, not nebulous speculation.

When Scripture describes the Israelites’ exodus from Egypt around 1446 B.C.E., it places the event within a real historical setting. This anchoring in actual time underscores the Bible’s self-presentation as a record of facts, not cleverly invented fables. Exodus 3:15 has Jehovah telling Moses: “This is my name forever,” emphasizing that He is the real God acting in verifiable history. Such statements lend themselves to a high level of moral certainty. There is no reason to treat these biblical events as if they were subject to indefinite revision by speculative scholarship that undermines objective confidence.

Defining Certainty and Certitude

Certainty and certitude are often used interchangeably, yet they describe two closely related but distinct concepts. Certainty is an objective property of a fact or truth-claim; it depends on its logical or factual necessity and remains independent of a person’s response. Certitude refers to a knower’s subjective assurance about what is objectively true. Someone might lack certitude in a reality that is nonetheless certain. Conversely, a person might feel strong certitude about a claim that is objectively false. A conservative Christian approach to apologetics insists on aligning subjective certitude with objective certainty as revealed in Scripture and sound reasoning.

Logical certainty is reflected in statements like “5 + 4 = 9.” Such truths are beyond rational dispute because their denial entails contradiction. Metaphysical certainty includes those statements that cannot logically be false, such as “I exist,” because denying one’s existence presupposes an existing mind to do the denying. Moral certainty refers to the high probability that compels a mind to assent “beyond reasonable doubt,” even though a remote logical possibility of error remains. Practical certainty is less firm, though still strong enough to inform daily decisions (one might be certain he had breakfast, but an elaborate illusion could theoretically call it into question). Spiritual certainty, or supernatural certainty, is grounded in divine revelation. If Jehovah, the omniscient being, discloses a truth to a person or through His written Word, that revelation confers an unrivaled level of certainty, far surpassing ordinary human probabilities.

Certainty in Scripture

The Bible depicts itself as a source of trustworthy revelation that imparts certainty. Proverbs 30:5 teaches: “Every word of God is tested,” indicating there is no frivolous guesswork in the statements God affirms. Jesus prayed: “Your word is truth” (John 17:17). The Scriptures are regarded as God-breathed (2 Timothy 3:16), presenting teaching, reproof, correction, and training in righteousness. Although 1 Corinthians 2:14 acknowledges that the natural man often rejects spiritual things, it does not imply that no unbeliever can understand the Bible’s statements. Rather, it shows that accepting the spiritual authority of Scripture requires humility and an open heart, not a mystical infusion of knowledge.

Despite modern skepticism, the biblical writers demonstrate unwavering conviction in the truths they announce. The apostle John wrote: “These are written so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ” (John 20:31). He was unambiguously stating that readers can know and trust these accounts. Paul likewise wrote to the Corinthians in a manner indicating certainty, never reducing the resurrection to a metaphor. He spoke of a literal event that can be viewed as historically validated by many witnesses (1 Corinthians 15:3-8). The same resolute attitude resonates throughout Scripture. The exodus (Exodus 12:37-41), the walls of Jericho falling (Joshua 6:20), and King Hezekiah’s deliverance from Sennacherib (2 Kings 19:35) are narrated as factual realities, not unknown legends open to indefinite reinterpretation. By adopting a historical-grammatical exegesis, believers see in Scripture consistent patterns of factual claims, not pliable religious tropes.

Many contemporary Bible scholars, under the sway of secular methodologies, attempt to “de-mythologize” biblical texts or reduce them to uncertain traditions. Yet the objective sense of the biblical authors reveals that they considered events like the resurrection, the exodus, and Jesus’ miracles to be genuine, and they expected readers to share that certainty. One finds no tension between faith and reason in Paul’s approach (Acts 26:24-26). Standing before Festus, Paul boldly insisted that these events “have not been done in a corner.” Paul invited the hearer to investigate. Far from hedging with disclaimers such as “might have happened,” Paul proclaimed facts.

The Witness of the Old Testament

When Isaiah 40:8 declares, “The grass withers, the flower fades, but the word of our God will stand forever,” it exhibits moral certainty rather than a tentative pronouncement. God’s Word, given by Jehovah, is viewed as enduring truth that transcends human error. Likewise, Deuteronomy 6:4 confidently proclaims: “Hear, O Israel: Jehovah our God, Jehovah is one.” There is no wavering or reticence in the statement. The text demands wholehearted acceptance of an absolute reality.

Historical narratives in the Old Testament likewise present themselves as reliable records. When the text indicates that King David reigned for forty years (1 Kings 2:11), it is offered as fact. Neither David’s existence nor his years of reign are couched in the language of possibility. Consistent with the historical-grammatical approach, these data are intended to be read with straightforward comprehension. Although the language of Scripture employs figures of speech and poetic devices, it never reduces the exodus, monarchy, or creation account to uncertain speculation. Instead, its presentation is fact-laden, confident, and assured.

Jesus’ Absolute Certainty About Scripture

Jesus’ teaching likewise exhibits supreme confidence in God’s Word. In Mark 12:26-27, Jesus refutes the Sadducees’ denial of the resurrection by appealing to Jehovah’s self-identification: “I am the God of Abraham and the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob.” The argument rests on the precise form of the statement, indicating that God’s relationship to the patriarchs remained active, so there must be resurrection hope. Jesus did not employ ambiguous philosophical digressions; He built His reasoning on the certainty that Scripture is reliable, even in its finer points.

Matthew 24:35 has Jesus affirm: “Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away.” This is not a provisional claim subject to modern higher-critical revision. He staked His entire ministry on the truthfulness of Scripture. In John 10:35, He asserted that “the Scripture cannot be broken.” There is no sense that the Word is ambiguous or indefinite. The Son of God viewed the Old Testament accounts of Jonah, the global Flood, and the creation of Adam and Eve as historical realities (Matthew 12:40; 24:38-39; 19:4-5). The Gospels show Jesus often quoting and affirming the reliability of the Old Testament. The entire tone is certain, not cautious or merely suggestive. This is a model for Christians. Jesus’ high view of Scripture provides an example of how believers can ground their apologetics in unshakable assurance rather than modern vacillation.

The Historical-Grammatical Method of Interpretation

The historical-grammatical method affirms that Scripture should be interpreted according to its plain sense. This approach evaluates a text’s grammar, syntax, vocabulary, and context, as well as the historical setting in which it was written. By clarifying the author’s intended meaning, believers can have confidence in the theological truths expressed. This view refuses to impose hidden allegories, typologies, or mystical layers that distort the literal meaning. It also resists the higher-critical presupposition that biblical texts must be dissected into uncertain fragments or layered redactions. The historical-grammatical approach seeks to read each book of Scripture as an authentic piece of literature that conveys intelligible truth.

Adhering to this method nurtures certainty. If the biblical author states that “the fear of Jehovah is the beginning of wisdom” (Proverbs 9:10), then that direct assertion invites a sure conclusion rather than indefinite speculation. If a narrative tells of Israel’s conquest of Canaan, the historical-grammatical reader sees it as an actual sequence of events rather than a folk-tale shaped by unknown editors. This straightforward reading builds trust in Scripture’s claim to be God’s Word. Such trust goes hand in hand with moral certainty, which arises from the consistent testimony of the biblical authors and the reliability of their accounts.

Modern Skepticism and the Trend Toward Uncertainty

Modern biblical scholarship frequently echoes the voices of secular critics who view ancient texts with suspicion. Because these scholars typically approach Scripture with naturalistic biases, they resist the notion of miracles, prophecy, or supernatural revelation. Consequently, their published works are often filled with qualifiers. According to them, biblical accounts “might be” later redactions, “could be” exaggerated legends, or “perhaps” reflect sociopolitical agendas. Even the life of Jesus is reduced to an ambiguous patchwork of data that can never be fully reconciled.

Daniel B. Wallace once observed, “Modern-day scholars are more comfortable with uncertainty.” Such an inclination arises partly from academia’s standard for cautious, tentative conclusions. But for believers who accept the Bible as divine revelation, indefinite speculations cannot overturn the moral certainty that Scripture invites. The biblical authors, such as Luke, researched and reported events with clarity (Luke 1:1-4). For them, and for the Christian who follows the same approach, the known facts of Jesus’ death and resurrection demand thoughtful but certain affirmation. That is why the apostolic writings never retreat into indefinite disclaimers about whether Christ rose or whether He performed miracles. Their claims are bold statements presented as absolute realities.

It is vital to note that genuine certainty does not rest on blind emotion or prejudice. Biblical faith is not a leap into the dark but a confident step into the light of divine truth. Such trust is supported by historical evidence, fulfilled prophecy, and the coherent message of Scripture. For instance, Isaiah’s prophecies of the Messiah find actual fulfillment in the life, death, and resurrection of Christ, not in an allegorical reinterpretation of indefinite or unknown stories. Isaiah 53 accurately portrays the suffering servant, connecting directly to Jesus’ redemptive work and culminating in the New Testament’s clear testimony of Christ’s sacrifice.

Refuting the Notion That John 16:13 Applies to All Christians

When Jesus spoke of the Spirit leading the apostles into “all the truth” (John 16:13), He was addressing a specific group: those who would become the foundational witnesses and penmen of the New Testament. This promise is often misunderstood or misapplied. The immediate context indicates that Jesus was reassuring His disciples, who would face the daunting task of preaching and writing authoritative Scripture for the early church. Because John 16:13 was never intended as a universal claim that every Christian throughout history would receive personal infallible guidance from the Holy Spirit, it does not support the idea that believers enjoy a mystical indwelling guaranteeing error-free understanding.

Although the Spirit works in believers, He does so primarily through the inspired Word that He has preserved (2 Timothy 3:16). If a Christian carefully studies Scripture, applies sound reasoning, and humbly prays for illumination, that believer is guided by the same Spirit whose Word is being examined. However, this form of guidance does not bypass human faculties or bestow guaranteed infallibility. It instead underscores that certainty arises from God’s revealed Word, not from personal revelations or subjective experiences.

Certainty Without the Indwelling of the Holy Spirit

Some branches of Christendom assert that each believer receives a personal indwelling of the Holy Spirit that directly imparts knowledge or confidence. Yet the objective truth remains that Scripture, not an inward mystical voice, is the final authority on doctrine. True, the New Testament does speak of the Spirit’s work in believers’ lives, but the biblical pattern shows that God’s Word is what shapes the mind and heart (Hebrews 4:12). This shaping may be described metaphorically as the influence of the Spirit. But the texts do not teach that the Spirit resides inside Christians in a charismatic sense or provides them with direct, immediate revelation.

When believers proclaim the good news, they are guided by the Spirit-inspired pages of the Bible, not by personal miraculous impartations. When Jesus promised the apostles that they would be guided into truth, He specifically addressed those men who would be eyewitnesses of His ministry. Their writings form the basis of what the Christian congregation came to accept as the canonical New Testament. This deposit of truth is the sure foundation for all generations. In that sense, we do have certainty because we rest in the revelation God graciously provided, not in fleeting spiritual sensations.

The Importance of Upholding a Literal Hermeneutic

A literal hermeneutic steers Christians away from reading allegorical or mystical meanings into the text without textual warrant. This approach helps guard against speculation that undermines confidence in the biblical message. Rejecting typology in favor of a more direct handling of the text ensures the continuity of meaning between the biblical author and the modern reader. One can have certainty about the meaning of Scripture when its words and phrases are taken in their grammatical sense within the historical context.

Literal hermeneutics counters the claims of those who try to impose “symbolic” readings to avoid the text’s clear teachings. When God told Adam he would “surely die” if he ate from the forbidden tree (Genesis 2:17), the plain sense is that disobedience would result in literal death, consistent with the rest of Scripture’s teaching on mortality (Romans 5:12). There is no room to reduce the text to a mere metaphor or moral parable. This framework aligns perfectly with the user’s conviction that humans are souls (Genesis 2:7), not possessors of an immortal entity separate from the body. The historical-grammatical approach sees no biblical foundation for an immortal soul that departs at death or for a place of eternal torment as many traditions have taught.

When Ecclesiastes 9:5 says “the dead do not know anything,” the literal hermeneutic interprets this straightforwardly as the condition of the dead, not as an idiomatic flourish to describe a spiritual dimension. Likewise, references to Sheol or Hades denote the grave, the realm of the dead, rather than a place of conscious torment. This consistent approach provides a coherent biblical theology that fosters certainty in the nature of humankind’s condition after death. Rather than succumbing to centuries of theological speculation, we trust the Scriptures’ literal statements about mortality.

Rejecting Modern Theological Uncertainties

Relativism permeates many academic circles. Students are taught that absolute statements about truth are naive or “outdated.” Indeed, “Modern-day scholars are more comfortable with uncertainty,” to quote Dr. Daniel B. Wallace once more. This cultural tide tempts believers to backpedal on their confidence in the truth of the Bible. Some might prefer to speak in indefinite language, fearing that forthright declarations sound unsophisticated or fundamentalistic. Yet that fear is unwarranted when the evidences for Scripture’s reliability are so robust.

Critics of biblical certainty often invoke subjective certitude that can lead to error. They point out that adherents of various religions can be absolutely convinced of mutually contradictory beliefs. Indeed, subjective certitude is fallible. But biblical Christians ground their conviction in the objective truth claims of the Bible, supported by historical testimony, coherent internal structure, and fulfillment of prophecy. These objective supports are different from purely subjective experiences or traditions. Thus, moral certainty about Scripture is not blind. It arises from the cumulative evidence pointing to the Bible’s divine origin.

First Principles and the Assurance of Reason

In Christian apologetics, reason and faith are partners, not foes. The laws of logic (such as the law of noncontradiction) are self-evident first principles that cannot be denied without contradiction. One must exist in order to think, and one cannot affirm “I do not exist” without existing to affirm it. These first principles undergird rational discourse, and by extension, they provide the framework for evaluating truth claims. God created human minds with the capacity to reason (Isaiah 1:18). The Christian worldview sees logic as a reflection of the orderliness of God’s creation.

Thus, faith and logic converge to produce well-grounded certainty on essential doctrines. We know that “Christ died for our sins” (1 Corinthians 15:3) is a proposition that must either be true or false. The biblical witness, combined with reasoned analysis of history, leads to the firm conclusion that it is indeed true. There is no textual or archaeological basis to interpret this statement as symbolic or ephemeral. The same unity of faith and reason compels belief that the entire biblical narrative from Genesis to Revelation is a coherent story of God’s dealings with mankind, culminating in Christ. If logic testifies that something can be known with clarity, and if Scripture proclaims it as truth, then moral certainty—indeed, spiritual certainty—follows naturally.

The Role of Evidence and the Will

Biblical faith, unlike modern rationalism, does not isolate the intellect from the will or the heart. Certainty is not merely an abstract exercise; it is a personal conviction. Yet biblical apologetics refuses to generate that conviction through emotional manipulation. The will can assent to the truth for insufficient reasons, producing a false sense of security. The Christian is called to love God with all the heart, soul, strength, and mind (Luke 10:27). This means examining evidence, aligning with truth, and then responding with total commitment. The will’s readiness to obey God and accept His Word coincides with the intellect’s confirmation of Scripture’s trustworthiness.

Sometimes individuals experience emotional or psychological doubt even after they have intellectually affirmed biblical truths. Such experiences do not necessarily negate genuine conviction. The remedy is to return to Scripture’s certainty. Psalm 119:105 expresses confidence in the guiding clarity of God’s Word: “Your word is a lamp to my feet and a light to my path.” This is not a metaphor for ephemeral or indefinite guidance. It is a vivid expression of the abiding and reliable nature of God’s revelation.

Addressing Popular Misconceptions About Certainty

Some argue that certainty leads to closed-mindedness or the stifling of genuine inquiry. They conflate dogmatic pride with honest conviction. True biblical certainty does not reject new information or ignore challenges; rather, it stands firm on the foundational truths of Scripture while graciously interacting with objections. The apostle Paul showed respect for his audience’s intellect, as illustrated in Acts 17:2-3, where he “reasoned with them from the Scriptures, explaining and giving evidence.” He approached them with certainty, not to overrun them, but to persuade them through Scripture and reason. Christians, likewise, can hold confident convictions while engaging in respectful dialogue.

Others claim that because the Bible might have textual variants or differences in style, certainty is unattainable. Yet textual criticism, performed responsibly within a historical-grammatical framework, overwhelmingly confirms the stability of the biblical text. Although we do not apply higher-critical theories that undermine the unity or reliability of Scripture, legitimate textual study shows that no major doctrine is compromised by any variant. Believers can remain confident that the Bible they read is a faithful representation of the God-breathed originals, and the process of careful textual study only strengthens our certainty rather than diminishing it.

The Danger of Equating Uncertainty with Humility

In some academic and ecclesiastical contexts, uncertainty is prized as a mark of humility. The assumption is that claiming certainty is pretentious. Yet humility is not the same as perpetual doubt. Indeed, we find the epitome of humility in Jesus Himself (Philippians 2:6-8). He was gentle and kind, yet utterly certain of His identity and His mission. Claiming that biblical truth is knowable and sure is not arrogance if one is resting on God’s revelation rather than personal prowess. Genuine humility acknowledges that the certainty stems from God’s authority, not from human intellect alone.

The apostle Peter, who famously instructed believers to have a defense of their hope (1 Peter 3:15), lived with unwavering assurance of Jesus’ resurrection. He also proclaimed: “We did not follow cleverly devised tales when we made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but we were eyewitnesses” (2 Peter 1:16). This is humility grounded in divine truth. Peter was not exalting himself but pointing to the fact that he had witnessed these realities. Modern readers can share that confidence through the testimony of Scripture, trusting that the divine message is fundamentally reliable.

Contending for Objective Biblical Chronology

Christians who hold to a literal reading of Scripture also recognize that biblical chronology matters for buttressing the historical claims of the text. If one proposes arbitrary or liberal dates that undercut the biblical timeline, then the events in Scripture are pushed into a nebulous realm. Yet the internal markers of the text, alongside external historical and archaeological evidence, affirm that events like the exodus occurred around 1446 B.C.E., the dedication of Solomon’s temple around 960 B.C.E., and the birth of Jesus around 2 B.C.E. to 1 B.C.E. By upholding these approximate but justifiable dates, believers reinforce the objective nature of scriptural events, lending further weight to moral certainty. Far from being trivial, biblical chronology situates redemption history firmly in the realm of real-time occurrences.

The Unbiblical Nature of Calvinistic Predestination and Charismatic Beliefs

While this discussion focuses primarily on certainty, the subject relates to other theological viewpoints. The user’s background rejects Calvinism and charismatic theology, each of which can involve misunderstandings about certainty. Calvinistic predestination, in the user’s view, risks diminishing human free will, thereby creating philosophical tensions about personal accountability and the sincerity of divine love. If destiny were fixed by God, the personal element of faith would seem undermined. Yet the biblical text portrays God as offering a genuine invitation to all, without imposing an unalterable fate on individuals. Passages like Joshua 24:15 (“choose for yourselves today whom you will serve”) illustrate genuine choice, thus showcasing moral and spiritual agency rather than inevitability.

Charismatic Christianity, on the other hand, often roots certainty in experiences, signs, or manifestations attributed to the Holy Spirit. That approach can lead to confusion when supposed manifestations conflict with Scripture or fail to materialize. By grounding Christian conviction in the sure Word of God, believers avoid the pitfalls of chasing sensational phenomena. Jesus warned that “false prophets will arise and will show great signs and wonders” (Matthew 24:24), indicating that miraculous signs alone do not guarantee truth. The historical-grammatical interpretation places the final authority in Scripture, fostering certainty that is based on permanent revelation rather than ephemeral signs.

No Eternal Torment in a Fiery Hell

Some might wonder how the belief that there is no eternal torment in a fiery hell ties in with the theme of certainty. The user’s perspective is that Sheol, Hades, Gehenna, and Tartarus refer scripturally to the common grave, not to an unending place of torture. This approach, grounded in literal exegesis, rejects the popular notion of an immortal soul that continues in conscious torment after death. Instead, it teaches that “the soul that sins will die” (Ezekiel 18:4) in a literal sense. The biblical penalty for sin is death, not life in torment.

This teaching underscores how a consistently literal hermeneutic can yield firm conclusions. Romans 6:23 states: “For the wages of sin is death, but the gracious gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.” That straightforward contrast implies that the default end of sinners is death, not a disembodied existence in flames. When believers apply a grammatical-historical reading to these texts, they form a certain understanding that concurs with the rest of Scripture’s portrayal of God’s justice, love, and mercy. Certainty in biblical doctrine emerges when Scripture is allowed to interpret itself, without adding extrabiblical traditions about unending conscious torment.

The Human Person as a Soul

Genesis 2:7 teaches that man became a “living soul,” signifying that humans do not merely possess a separate, immortal soul but rather that we, in our entirety, are souls. An honest reading of the text shows that God formed man from dust and breathed life into him, resulting in a living being. No immortal essence is implied. This biblical anthropology, consistently found from the earliest pages of Scripture, confers certainty about the nature of humans as integrated wholes. The worldview that humans have an immaterial soul that departs at death arises largely from philosophical influences outside of the Hebrew thought world.

Acknowledging that “the dead are conscious of nothing” (Ecclesiastes 9:5) completes this picture. It also guards believers against adopting mystical or animistic ideas that undermine Scripture. Certainty on this point does not rest on tradition or ecclesiastical authority; it proceeds from the plain sense of the biblical text. Realizing the integrated nature of human life fosters a better understanding of salvation. Eternal life is a gift conferred through resurrection, not through an ever-living soul that bypasses death. These doctrines, derived from literal exegesis and confirmed throughout the Bible, exemplify how believers can achieve moral and spiritual certainty about core teachings.

Overcoming Emotional Doubts and Finding Assurance

Even with rational defenses and biblical testimonies of certainty, some may wrestle with doubt, especially during life’s difficulties. Yet Scripture never teaches that life’s difficulties exist as tests from God to refine people. James 1:13 insists, “God cannot be tempted by evil, and he himself does not tempt anyone.” Humanity’s suffering results from the fall of Adam and the subsequent free will choices of humankind, not from a divine scheme to shape character through hardship. Recognizing that God is not the author of evil or of enticements to sin can bolster one’s confidence in His goodness.

Spiritual certainty finds practical application when believers rely on God’s promises. Psalm 55:22 exhorts: “Cast your burden on Jehovah, and he will sustain you.” He is the same God whose historical deeds are chronicled in Scripture. He parted the Red Sea for the Israelites (Exodus 14:21), delivered David from his enemies (2 Samuel 22:1), and raised Jesus from the dead (Acts 2:24). These are not abstract allegories. They are real acts of divine intervention. If God truly intervened in those circumstances, believers can be certain He remains able to accomplish His will. This forms a foundation for stable faith.

Uniting Reason and Revelation for Full Conviction

Biblical Christianity is not an anti-intellectual stance; it invites rigorous study and robust engagement of the mind. Nor is it an arid rationalism that displaces heartfelt devotion. Instead, it is a total commitment of mind and heart to the truths revealed by Jehovah. The historical-grammatical method clarifies those truths. Reason tests them and finds them coherent. The will consents to them as ultimate reality. Because God is “not a God of confusion” (1 Corinthians 14:33), the truths He reveals possess internal consistency. This coherence is observable in the unity of Scripture and its fulfillment of prophecy, which strengthens moral certainty.

When Abraham was commanded to offer Isaac (Genesis 22:2), he was acting under a direct divine mandate. That unique situation gave Abraham spiritual certainty because Jehovah spoke to him unmistakably. Today, believers do not expect new direct revelations but rest on the complete scriptural canon. The God who can infallibly speak to a prophet in ancient times can preserve His Word so that all generations may know what He has revealed. This continuity from the patriarchs to the apostles provides a secure lineage of revealed truth on which Christians can stand with confidence.

The Church’s Duty to Proclaim Certainty

The early Christians were known for their bold preaching, testifying that Jesus is “both Lord and Christ” (Acts 2:36). They did not dilute their message with disclaimers about possible textual redactions or hidden mythic layers. They did not allow the fear of human opinion to undermine their conviction. This apostolic paradigm remains vital for the modern church. “Faith comes from hearing, and hearing by the word of Christ” (Romans 10:17). If the message is ambiguous or cloaked in incessant academic qualifiers, how will anyone develop stable faith? A church that preaches “could be” or “might have happened” robs believers of the moral and spiritual certainty that Scripture demands.

Galatians 1:8 underscores the seriousness of clinging to the original gospel. If someone were to proclaim a different gospel, they would stand under a curse. Such a robust statement of exclusivity aligns with the need for certainty in matters of salvation. This unwavering stance is not bigotry or narrow-mindedness; it is a faithful adherence to divine revelation. Holding to biblical truths about who God is, what salvation entails, and how believers are to live is not an exercise in arrogance. It is a matter of loyalty to the God who reveals Himself in Scripture.

Practical Applications of Certainty

When believers live out this certainty, they exhibit confidence in daily life that glorifies God. They share the good news with clarity because they know the biblical narrative is historically grounded and doctrinally sound. They do not cower before criticism that labels them as intellectually backward. Instead, they can explain why the resurrection is a historical event and not a myth. They demonstrate that the text from Genesis to Revelation stands unified in its message. They acknowledge the continuity that runs from the earliest revelation of Jehovah to Moses in 1446 B.C.E. to the final apostolic writings in the first century C.E.

This certain faith helps believers navigate moral decisions. When Scripture declares that lying, theft, or adultery is wrong, it does so with finality (Exodus 20:1-17). That divine standard is not a cultural relic. It flows from God’s eternal character, giving moral certainty. Similarly, the Christian can remain steadfast in moral judgments without succumbing to relativism. Unyielding convictions are not unkind but reflect fidelity to God’s revealed will. Though Christians are not under the Mosaic law’s ceremonial aspects, the moral principles of God’s Word still speak with authority. This fosters a community of believers who are grounded, stable, and coherent in their moral reasoning.

The Joy of Standing on Certain Truth

Biblical assurance brings joy because it quiets restless speculation. Psalm 19:7 declares, “The law of Jehovah is perfect, restoring the soul.” The believer whose faith is anchored in Scripture finds a safe harbor from the storms of academic trends or philosophical fashions. One can wholeheartedly rejoice in Christ’s resurrection, certain that it is a historical and theological fact. One can preach eternal life in God’s coming kingdom with boldness, assured that it reflects the clear teachings of God’s Word. This confidence does not produce complacency but fosters a desire to delve ever deeper into Scripture, appreciating the heights and depths of divine wisdom.

Conclusion

Christian apologetics is not served by ambivalence. The apostolic model and the biblical witness call for a forthright proclamation that relies on the reliability of God’s revelation. Logic, history, sound exegesis, and heartfelt devotion converge to give believers a firm place to stand. Modern scholarship’s fascination with permanent skepticism need not unsettle those who place their confidence in the God who created the mind and gave Scripture as a sure guide. The Christian faith is more than guesswork. It rests on events that happened in real time, supported by multiple witnesses and coherent documents that have withstood scrutiny for centuries. When we read the biblical narratives, we encounter a God who is certain of Himself and of His plan, and He invites us to share that assurance.

Absolute certainty is indeed possible, not because believers are intellectually superior or spiritually endowed with personal infallibility, but because God Himself has spoken. The apostle Paul exuded certainty when he wrote, “I know whom I have believed” (2 Timothy 1:12). He understood that the foundation of his assurance was not fleeting emotion or philosophical speculation but the solid rock of God’s revelation. The same holds true for believers today who adopt a historical-grammatical interpretation of Scripture, remain confident in the text’s integrity, and align their will with the truths God has revealed. If Jehovah is a God of truth, then nothing He discloses can be false. That conviction fuels Christian apologetics with an unshakable stance in a culture adrift in doubt.

You May Also Enjoy

How Should a Christian Live According to the Bible?

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).