Please Help Us Keep These Thousands of Blog Posts Growing and Free for All

$5.00

How Has Stephen’s Sacrifice Influenced Our Understanding of Early Christian Conviction?

The Circumstances Surrounding Stephen’s Ministry

The earliest account of Stephen emerges after the ascension of Christ in 33 C.E. (Acts 1:9). As the Christian congregation rapidly grew, a specific concern arose when the Greek-speaking Jewish widows found themselves overlooked in daily provisions. Stephen was among seven men deemed “full of Spirit and wisdom” (Acts 6:3) to address this issue. Although these seven were tasked with the administrative oversight of food distribution, their appointment signified that they possessed the qualities necessary to preserve unity and trust among the faithful. The congregation did not see this position as a trivial assignment; rather, Stephen’s character demonstrated that he was adept at handling delicate matters in a congregation facing cultural and linguistic differences. His name, linked to a Greek root meaning “crown” or “wreath,” would acquire deep significance as the first Christian martyr.

Stephen’s appointment required a balanced approach. While helping coordinate the distribution of grains and staples to the needy, he continued to preach Christ vigorously. Acts 6:8 says, “Stephen, full of graciousness and power,” displayed a fervent conviction that was undeniable. He did not confine himself to logistical tasks but testified to the truth in the open, refuting those who opposed the faith. His audience included Jews from various regions, such as the so-called Synagogue of the Freedmen. They attempted to challenge his message, yet “they could not hold their own against the wisdom and the Spirit by which he was speaking” (Acts 6:10). Their failure to silence him through debate paved the way for more direct and sinister methods.

False accusations were leveled against Stephen. Enemies convinced individuals to claim that Stephen spoke blasphemous words against Moses and against Jehovah. They dragged him before the Sanhedrin, twisting his message into a charge of repudiating the Temple and the Mosaic customs. Such allegations appealed to the sensitivities of Jewish religious leaders who held dear the traditions and laws delivered through Moses. Stephen did not shrink from his testimony in the face of these accusations. While standing before the Sanhedrin, he became an exemplar of the believer who remains “steadfast in the faith” (1 Peter 5:9), guided not by fear, but by a devotion to the Spirit-inspired Word of God.

Stephen’s Defense Before the Sanhedrin

When Stephen addressed the Sanhedrin, he recounted the dealings of Jehovah with the Hebrew people from the time of Abraham onward (Acts 7:2–50). This sweeping review of Israelite history was not an empty rehearsal of familiar events; it was a specific argument designed to confront the hypocrisy of those who were accusing him. Stephen recognized the hearts of his accusers, who prided themselves on the legacy of Moses and the Temple. He exposed how their ancestors had often resisted God’s prophets, thereby illuminating the tragic pattern they themselves now perpetuated. His words were direct: “You stiff-necked people…you always resist the Holy Spirit” (Acts 7:51). He did not frame his defense as a personal vindication. Rather, he used Scripture to illustrate that they had consistently resisted the counsel of God.

Stephen ended with a profound confrontation: “Which of the prophets did your fathers not persecute?” (Acts 7:52). His words were a bold censure of the audience who claimed loyalty to Jehovah but refused to acknowledge that their actions reflected the same hardness of heart historically demonstrated by those who had attacked the prophets. The final chord of Stephen’s accusation was that they had now betrayed and murdered the Righteous One. The Sanhedrin “were infuriated” and “began gnashing their teeth at him” (Acts 7:54). Their fury confirmed the truth of his indictments. They had no scriptural rebuttal; hatred replaced reason. Stephen’s calm resolve, so vividly depicted in the biblical account, testifies to his conviction that fidelity to divine truth transcended the fear of earthly authority.

A pivotal moment arrived when Stephen was given a vision. “But he, full of Holy Spirit, gazed into heaven and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing at the right hand of God” (Acts 7:55). Jehovah granted him this remarkable confirmation that Jesus—risen and exalted—stood ready to receive Stephen’s sacrifice. By publicly relating what he saw, Stephen evoked an even more violent response. They refused to hear any suggestion that the Christ whom they had rejected was indeed at God’s right hand. Covering their ears and shouting, they rushed upon Stephen and cast him out of the city. There, they began to stone him, fulfilling the penalty reserved for alleged blasphemers. On the outskirts of Jerusalem, this faithful witness met his death around 34 C.E., making him the first Christian to pay the ultimate price for proclaiming Jesus as the Messiah.

Why Stephen’s Execution Sparked Renewed Zeal

Stephen’s death was not an event of futility. Acts 8:2 records how “devout men buried Stephen and made great lamentation over him.” His execution compelled the early Christian congregation to scatter throughout the regions of Judea and Samaria. Rather than crushing the faith of believers, the wave of persecution triggered by Stephen’s martyrdom propelled them to spread the good news more widely. This mirrored the words of Jesus in Acts 1:8, that his followers would be witnesses “in Jerusalem and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the end of the earth.” Stephen’s stoning served as a catalyst for fulfilling this directive, illustrating that what appeared to be a setback in human eyes was often part of the expansion of faith.

One of the central figures at Stephen’s execution was Saul of Tarsus, who kept watch over the garments of those who participated in the stoning (Acts 7:58; 8:1). Saul, later known as the apostle Paul, stood as a vivid example that God’s Word could transform any heart. The memory of Stephen’s final plea—“Jehovah, do not charge this sin against them” (Acts 7:60)—would resonate in Saul’s conscience. While the Bible does not state explicitly how these words affected him, the subsequent transformation of Saul to Paul was one of the most remarkable developments in early Christian history. The seeds of mercy and forgiveness sown by Stephen might have lingered in Saul’s mind until his encounter with the risen Christ. Stephen’s example thus transcended his death, as the sincerity of his faith laid a foundation for the future apostle’s ministry.

Continuation of the Faithful Witness

The martyrdom of Stephen emerges as a profound turning point. Many men and women who fled Jerusalem carried forward the testimony that Jesus was the Messiah. In Samaria, Philip—another of the seven “certified men” appointed alongside Stephen—proclaimed the word with such effect that the inhabitants responded in large numbers. Others journeyed to the coast, and still others traveled north to Antioch. They took the message of Christ to synagogues in far-reaching lands, bearing witness to the reality that genuine faith thrives under persecution.

The synergy between Stephen’s example and the scattering of believers extends into the broader tapestry of early Christian endurance. These were individuals who believed that Jesus’ words in John 16:33 applied to them: “In the world you will have tribulation. But take heart; i have overcome the world.” Stephen’s experience confirmed that tribulation did not signify divine disfavor, but rather stood as a testimony of faithfulness in a hostile environment. Instead of diminishing the Christian movement, such hostile actions often fueled a deeper resolve among those scattered abroad. They relied upon the Spirit-inspired Word, remembering that God does not tempt believers or orchestrate oppressive actions to refine them. Difficulties arose from the rejection of divine sovereignty by humanity at large, revealing the flaws of a world estranged from God.

The Christians maintained devotion to God’s revealed truth. They refused allegorical or typological reinterpretations of the Scriptures, insisting that God’s Word was to be understood in its literal sense. Their experiences validated this position, for Stephen’s final message was not cloaked in allegory but was a direct indictment of hypocrisy drawn from straightforward biblical history. His conviction that the words of the prophets and the teachings of Christ held literal authority fueled his boldness. His stoning authenticated that unwavering adherence to the Scriptures could result in violent opposition.

Why Stephen’s Example Continues to Resonate

Stephen’s testimony continues to stand as a model for devotion. He was not an apostle, nor was he part of the twelve. Yet he played a vital role in the early congregation. His example transcends time, demonstrating that the essence of Christian conviction is not reserved for a chosen few, but is attainable by any believer who is “full of Spirit and wisdom.” The sincerity of Stephen’s beliefs was manifested in his readiness to risk his life rather than compromise. His approach to defending the faith, grounded in Scripture, resonates with those who trust that the historical-grammatical interpretation of God’s Word remains the most faithful method of understanding it.

The Spirit-inspired Word guided Stephen. There is no indication in Scripture that the Spirit dwelled within believers as a literal indwelling. Instead, his knowledge of the Scriptures and the application of biblical wisdom provided him with the insight and determination to refute the arguments of those who opposed him. This approach reveals that accurate knowledge of the Bible, combined with the guidance of God’s Spirit-filled instruction, can enable any believer to make a forthright stand for truth. The impetus that drove Stephen was not an experiential phenomenon or a charismatic sign but the clarity of God’s written revelation.

Stephen’s martyrdom also testifies to the seriousness with which early believers treated their identity as “no part of the world” (John 17:16). Their loyalty to Jehovah eclipsed any loyalty to human institutions or authorities. Stephen’s readiness to lose his life rather than recant the truth underscores Jesus’ own words: “Whoever loses his life for my sake will find it” (Matthew 10:39). Far from seeking martyrdom, Stephen merely refused to deny the gospel, and the Jewish leaders responded with lethal violence.

Historical Observations Concerning Stephen’s Background

Though not a large portion of Scripture addresses Stephen’s personal background, it is evident that he was part of the Jewish remnant that accepted Christ. Some have noted that Stephen likely spoke both Aramaic and Greek, an asset in bridging the cultural gap between Hebrew-speaking and Hellenistic Jews. His sensitivity to the widows of the Greek-speaking portion of the congregation indicated a man of empathy and diligence. This outlook was essential in uniting believers of differing backgrounds. Such unity carried on the Spirit of Pentecost in 33 C.E., when Jews from various lands heard the good news in their own tongues (Acts 2:5–8).

Stephen’s educational background is unmentioned, yet his eloquence before the Sanhedrin demonstrates a thorough grounding in the Hebrew Scriptures. Acts 7:22 records how Moses, centuries prior, was “instructed in all the wisdom of the Egyptians.” Stephen, similarly, was well-versed in Jewish historical traditions. He cited God’s dealings with Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, and Moses without hesitation, stepping through the pivotal chapters of Israel’s past to prove his contention that rebelliousness against God’s messengers was nothing new. This approach indicated a deep mastery of biblical narratives, likely fostered by time spent studying the scrolls and the teachings of the apostles.

Although Scripture does not specify the year of Stephen’s birth, his martyrdom around 34 C.E. places him within the first wave of believers who embraced the risen Christ. He walked the streets of Jerusalem when the apostles were testifying to the resurrection in the very city where Christ had been crucified and resurrected. Stephen participated in a movement that was not yet called “Christianity” in the modern sense. They were known simply as believers who “belonged to the Way” (Acts 9:2). The integrity of Stephen’s devotion was a testament to the sincerity permeating that early congregation.

The Role of Administration and Evangelism in Stephen’s Ministry

Stephen’s example highlights that Christian service includes both tangible acts of care and bold proclamation. His administrative responsibilities involved distributing food among needy widows, a challenging duty in an environment of potential ethnic or linguistic division. By fulfilling it faithfully, Stephen upheld unity and compassion within the congregation. Beyond that, he preached openly about Christ. This combination of practicality and public testimony underscores that genuine Christianity addresses both spiritual and physical concerns.

His demonstration of “graciousness and power” (Acts 6:8) suggests that the spiritual strength Stephen displayed was not an elusive, mystical endowment but rather the consistent result of prayerful reliance on God’s Word. He recognized that God’s principles are designed to be lived out, not merely studied. In a city brimming with religious tensions, his signs and wonders validated the authenticity of his ministry. The text does not specify each miracle, yet it indicates that the fledgling congregation enjoyed strong divine backing. Hostile observers could not credibly refute the authority behind Stephen’s words, which led them to manufacture charges of blasphemy. This pattern echoed the fate of Christ himself, whose uncompromising teaching provoked the fury of those wedded to tradition.

Stephen’s Arrest and the Handling of False Witnesses

The events leading to Stephen’s arrest offer a glimpse into how allegations of blasphemy were manipulated by his enemies. Jewish religious leaders recognized that a direct theological debate would prove fruitless, so they found individuals willing to testify falsely. These witnesses stoked the crowd’s fears by alleging that Stephen had spoken against the Temple and the Law. The penalty for proven blasphemy under the Law could be death (Leviticus 24:16). By painting Stephen as one who repudiated the very worship system that Israel cherished, they incited a sanctimonious rage. The deeper irony was that Stephen’s speech before the Sanhedrin demonstrated a profound respect for God’s dealings with Israel across the centuries, rather than any desire to undermine legitimate worship. He believed the Scriptures had their fulfillment in Christ, and he took pains to illustrate that God had worked through the patriarchs and prophets to prepare the way for the Messiah.

The parallels between Stephen’s trial and that of Jesus are striking. Both faced contrived evidence and were ultimately condemned by religious leaders who presumed they were protecting their traditions. The outcomes in both cases attest to the words of the apostle John: “The light has come into the world, and people loved the darkness rather than the light because their works were evil” (John 3:19). Stephen’s experience validated that faithfulness often attracts the ire of those unwilling to confront their own hypocrisy.

His Dying Vision and Prayer

Moments before his death, Stephen gazed into the heavens and exclaimed: “Look! i see the heavens opened, and the Son of Man standing at the right hand of God!” (Acts 7:56). The Sanhedrin erupted in fury. They refused to consider the possibility that Jesus was exalted at Jehovah’s right hand. In their thinking, this was the same offense that led them to press for the crucifixion of Jesus. Stephen’s statement was the final straw. They dragged him out of the city and stoned him. While the law of Moses required stoning as capital punishment for blasphemy, their rage overshadowed any semblance of a fair judicial procedure.

As stones rained upon him, Stephen’s final plea was, “Jehovah, do not charge this sin against them” (Acts 7:60). This prayer mirrored Christ’s own example at the crucifixion, when he asked forgiveness for his executioners (Luke 23:34). Stephen’s words testified to the internal transformation that springs from adhering to the teachings of Jesus. Despite experiencing horrific violence, his heart remained anchored in mercy and compassion. Those who witnessed his final breath saw a faith that remained unwavering unto death. This moment immortalized Stephen in the annals of Christian devotion, long before any formal historical documents about martyrs were composed.

The Aftermath of Stephen’s Martyrdom

Stephen’s death introduced a significant development. Acts 8:1 notes that “there arose on that day a great persecution against the congregation in Jerusalem.” Rather than stifling the gospel, however, this persecution facilitated its spread. Many fled Jerusalem, but they did not abandon their faith. Everywhere they went, they proclaimed the message of Christ’s resurrection. The seeds sown through Stephen’s unwavering stance sprouted in regions beyond Jerusalem, consistent with Jesus’ commission that the testimony would extend outward from the city to the rest of the world (Acts 1:8).

Saul, who stood consenting to Stephen’s stoning, took a central role in the ensuing persecution. He hauled men and women to prison, bent on destroying what he perceived as a dangerous sect. Yet in a twist of divine providence, Saul would become Paul, the apostle to the nations. His militant hostility would be redirected into zealous evangelism. The memory of Stephen’s courage may have lingered in Paul’s thoughts as he later endured persecutions for preaching the very faith he once tried to annihilate. Though the Bible does not provide explicit commentary on how deeply Stephen’s death affected Paul, the continuity of the events points to Stephen’s stoning as a critical juncture in the spread of Christianity throughout the Mediterranean world. The name of Stephen still evokes thoughts of unwavering dedication despite opposition from the highest religious authority in Jerusalem.

Stephen’s Place in Early Congregational History

The early Christian congregation had begun with remarkable fervor. Thousands in Jerusalem embraced the message shortly after Pentecost in 33 C.E. The sense of unity was so strong that believers sold possessions to distribute funds to the needy (Acts 2:44–45). The appointment of Stephen and the other six to manage distributions was itself a demonstration of that Spirit. The result was a congregation that was both compassionate and resolute. That sense of solidarity was tested under persecution, but Stephen’s loyalty showed that the foundation of the church rested on more than an emotional wave of enthusiasm. It was grounded in a living truth, the outworking of God’s redemptive plan as revealed through the Bible.

Stephen’s death around 34 C.E. quickly became a hallmark moment. Though the New Testament had not yet been finalized in written form, the memory of Stephen’s words was carefully preserved and recorded in the book of Acts by Luke under divine direction. The account provides an enduring witness to the high standard of devotion expected of believers. Rather than adopting sophisticated debates or rhetorical skill alone, Stephen combined heartfelt conviction with a thorough knowledge of Scripture. By recounting Israel’s history, he laid a foundation for his listeners to see the Messiah’s arrival as the culmination of God’s dealings with their forefathers. His oration, although it cost him his life, still stands as a vital piece of Scripture, testifying to how the earliest Christians viewed Old Testament prophecies.

Insight from Stephen’s Example for Modern Believers

Stephen epitomizes the Christian who merges practical service with fearless proclamation of truth. He did not consider preaching to be solely the domain of the apostles. His appointment to distribute necessities never stopped him from testifying about Christ. He represents the principle found in Colossians 3:23: “Whatever you do, work heartily, as for the Lord and not for men.” This perspective removed artificial divisions between daily service and evangelistic witness. His single-minded devotion to God’s Word remains a template for any who aspire to align themselves with biblical standards.

He also demonstrates that believers are not shielded from hostility. Hardships do not come from Jehovah’s design to refine individuals through suffering. Instead, they arise from a broken world that rejects the counsel of God. Stephen was guided by the Spirit-inspired Scriptures, yet he still faced brutality. His example debunks any notion that a faithful Christian life guarantees earthly tranquility. Though Stephen briefly served in a role of congregational oversight, the real hallmark of his life was the willingness to stand firm in the face of hostility. This unwavering stance continues to inspire many who navigate environments opposed to biblical values.

Stephen’s narrative likewise reinforces the role of forgiveness. Though battered by stones, he pleaded with Jehovah on behalf of his attackers. This act paralleled Jesus’ teaching to “love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you” (Matthew 5:44). Stephen thus exemplified a heart shaped by Scripture, prepared to absorb injustice rather than retaliate. His prayer for his adversaries allowed him to meet death with a conscience unburdened by hatred or vengeance.

The Broader Setting of Early Persecution

Within a few years of Stephen’s death, the Christian congregation spread geographically. The apostle James, the brother of John, was also executed (Acts 12:2) in 44 C.E. The pressures facing the congregation had no single origin. Some hostility came from religious zealots who saw the Christian message as an affront to the Law. Other times, Roman officials targeted believers under the mistaken notion that Christians threatened the imperial cult by refusing to venerate the emperor or pagan gods. These waves of persecution ensured that the seeds of Stephen’s courage continued to blossom in new regions.

Accounts of early martyrs find their nexus in Stephen’s story. He set a precedent for how to respond under duress. The biblical writer Luke pointed out that Stephen’s face at one point appeared “like the face of an angel” (Acts 6:15), a commentary on the serenity born of inner conviction. This does not imply that Stephen had an otherworldly glow but that he carried an evident calm and moral certainty even when confronted by the stern glare of the council. No legal threat or possible violence could sway him from exalting Christ as the Messiah.

Reflections on the Enduring Significance of Stephen’s Martyrdom

Stephen’s example underscores that Christian faith rests on more than intellectual assent. It is a matter of absolute devotion. Although many centuries have passed since that fateful stoning, the message remains unaltered. Stephen’s brief yet intensely dedicated life invites believers of every era to weigh whether they would stand firm for biblical truth, even when confronted by vehement opposition. His unwavering conviction confirms that a faithful servant can trust the Word of God entirely.

He established a model that extends well beyond his immediate context. The record of Stephen’s testimony fortifies every believer who has faced or may yet face repressive measures. Men and women throughout history have been compelled to pay a high price for refusing to renounce Christ or to reinterpret Scripture according to the demands of earthly authorities. Many who followed Stephen in that path found solace in his memory, recognizing that he was the first to face death for the Christian faith. Their own courage was inextricably linked to the knowledge that Stephen’s final prayer displayed the depth of Christian love.

The Holy Scriptures reveal that Jesus stands at the right hand of God, as indicated in Stephen’s vision, which refutes any argument that Jesus was a mere human prophet without ongoing heavenly authority. Stephen’s final exclamation testified that Christ did not remain in the grave but returned to heaven, fulfilling the prophecy at Psalm 110:1 that speaks of the Messiah seated at Jehovah’s right hand. The earliest believers accepted this wholeheartedly, unaffected by the scorn of those who refused to bow before the ascended Messiah. Stephen’s vision sealed that truth, bridging the gap between prophecy and actual fulfillment.

The First Martyr’s Legacy Within the Congregation

As the earliest recorded martyr, Stephen left an imprint on the Christian psyche. While the Scriptures direct worship and adoration exclusively to God through Christ, Stephen’s example remains an emblem of the dedication required of all believers. His story conveys that no earthly attachment can overshadow the supreme value of loyalty to God’s revealed will. This message resonates strongly with those who place their hope in a coming new system under Christ’s heavenly authority.

Stephen’s example offers further clarity about the Christian view of life’s worth. While Scripture repeatedly encourages believers to be peaceable and to avoid antagonizing authorities (Romans 13:1), Stephen’s death demonstrates that unyielding fidelity to biblical mandates may lead to dire consequences. Yet at no point do the Scriptures portray Stephen as having sought out martyrdom. He stood his ground because the truth entrusted to him was non-negotiable.

The record likewise clarifies the role of the Holy Spirit. Though some might interpret Stephen’s power as evidence of direct possession by the Spirit, the biblical text underscores that he was guided by the Spirit-inspired Word of God. His knowledge of Scripture and his understanding of God’s purpose allowed him to refute his adversaries. There was no notion that the Spirit forcibly controlled him; rather, his intellect, shaped by immersion in the divine Word, enabled him to speak boldly. This approach contrasts with so-called charismatic experiences that rely on emotional displays. Stephen’s wisdom was the outgrowth of dedicated study, fervent prayer, and unwavering devotion to Christ’s teachings.

Stephen’s Parallel With Old Testament Faithfulness

Though Stephen’s name surfaces only in the New Testament, his loyalty parallels that of faithful servants in the Old Testament who refused to bow to worldly authority. Figures like Daniel (Daniel 6:7–10) and his companions (Daniel 3:16–18) likewise risked capital punishment. Stephen stands in that same line of conviction, a continuity that shows how devotion to God’s sovereignty had been tested for centuries. The difference with Stephen is that he recognized Jesus as the promised Messiah, thereby fulfilling the trajectory of faith outlined in earlier Scriptures.

His uncompromising stance also highlights the continuity between the Hebrew Scriptures and the new covenant. Far from abolishing the Law, Stephen recognized that Christ was the culminating focal point of the Law and the Prophets. Though his detractors took his statements as an affront to Moses, Stephen’s defense made it evident that he esteemed Moses as a vital figure preparing the way for Christ. By directly quoting or referencing biblical events, he gave no room for the argument that his theology was an invention detached from Israel’s heritage. Rather, it was the religious leaders who strayed from the heart of God’s revelation by rejecting the Messiah. Stephen’s death cemented the fact that real faith in the promised Messiah required extraordinary commitment.

Emphasizing the Chronology of Stephen’s Death

The approximate timing of Stephen’s martyrdom—34 C.E.—situates his testimony just months or possibly a year after the congregation’s establishment at Pentecost (33 C.E.). This swift progression from the initial outpouring of the Spirit-inspired message to the ultimate sacrifice of a believer within such a short time underscores how quickly the new faith encountered organized resistance. Stephen’s stoning was a startling sign that the message of Christ’s resurrection had deeply unsettled the religious establishment in Jerusalem. This was no mild dispute of ideas but a raging determination on the part of religious authorities to maintain traditional control.

In a broader sense, Stephen’s death confirmed Jesus’ warning at John 15:20: “If they persecuted me, they will also persecute you.” Those words were no mere speculation. The account of Stephen’s trial and execution indicated the reality of that prophecy from the earliest stages of the Christian movement. His stoning set the stage for a series of confrontations between the message of the risen Christ and the entrenched authorities.

Conclusion

The story of Stephen showcases the blend of humility and courage that characterized the early Christian congregation. His appointment to serve widows, combined with his powerful public defense of the faith, reveals that faithfulness in small acts is not divorced from readiness to stand firm in monumental trials. Stephen’s death, while grievous, propelled the spread of the gospel to regions beyond Jerusalem and foreshadowed the global nature of the Christian mission. His final prayer for his persecutors stands as a testament to the transformation the Scriptures can produce in one’s heart.

The question of how Stephen’s life continues to shape the faith of believers remains open, inviting each generation to consider whether they would demonstrate equal resolve in the face of accusations or threats. Stephen’s conviction was not academic nor fueled by personal ambition. Instead, it was grounded in his unwavering confidence in the truth of God’s Word and in the knowledge that Jesus was indeed seated at Jehovah’s right hand. His decision to speak truth under hostile scrutiny remains a living lesson for all who endeavor to follow Christ’s example, guided not by human traditions, but by the Spirit-inspired Scriptures that have endured across centuries.

You May Also Enjoy

How Did The First-Century Church Evolve And Remain Faithful To Apostolic Teaching?

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).