Make a one-time donation

Make a monthly donation

Make a yearly donation

Choose an amount

$5.00

$15.00

$100.00

$5.00

$15.00

$100.00

$5.00

$15.00

$100.00

Or enter a custom amount

Your contribution is appreciated.

Donate Donate monthly Donate yearly

“The Quran—Confirmatory of Previous Scripture? Examining Consistency and Continuity” explores the Quran’s claims of divine origin and alignment with the Bible. This detailed analysis investigates its theological consistency, narrative alignment, and implications for Christian understanding.

Introduction

The Quran, a central religious text in Islam, claims to be a continuation and confirmation of the revelations given in the Pentateuch and the Gospels. As a conservative Evangelical Bible scholar, the examination of these claims requires an objective analysis of the Quran’s internal consistency, its alignment with previous scriptures, and the implications of its teachings. This exploration seeks to understand whether the Quran stands as a harmonious extension of biblical revelation or presents discrepancies that challenge its claim of divine origin.

The Quran’s Claim of Divine Origin

The Quran asserts its divine origin, claiming to be the word of God transmitted through the prophet Muhammad. Unlike the Pentateuch and the Gospels, which are accompanied by various miracles, the Quran’s primary claim to divine authority is its literary composition and the message it conveys. However, the absence of accompanying miracles, as traditionally understood in biblical accounts, raises questions about the nature of its divine claim.

Internal Consistency of the Quran

A critical aspect of evaluating the Quran’s divine claim is its internal consistency. The doctrine of abrogation within Islamic theology, where later revelations supersede earlier ones, is particularly significant. Suras such as 2:106 and 16:101 mention the replacement of revelations, suggesting a progression or change in divine directives. This concept is foreign to the biblical understanding of an unchanging God, as exemplified in James 1:17, indicating a fundamental difference in the portrayal of divine nature and revelation.

Discrepancies in Religious Tolerance

The Quranic texts present varying stances on religious tolerance. Early verses, such as Sura 2:256, advocate for “no compulsion in religion,” aligning with the principles of free will and personal choice. In contrast, later verses (e.g., Sura 9:5) command aggression against non-believers, creating a contradiction within the Quran itself regarding the approach to religious diversity and tolerance.

The Quran on Predestination and Human Free Will

The Quran presents conflicting messages on predestination and free will. Certain passages suggest human agency in salvation (Sura 18:28; 25:65-71; 40:44), while others emphasize divine predestination (Sura 11:120; 16:38, 39; 76:29-31), creating theological tension. This is in contrast to the biblical narrative, where God’s sovereignty and human responsibility are harmoniously integrated.

The Kibla Controversy

The direction of prayer (Kibla) in Islam, initially towards Jerusalem and later towards Mecca, as described in Suras 2:109, 172, and 2:139, 144, 145, illustrates a significant shift in Islamic practice. This change, while explained within Islamic theology, raises questions about the consistency of ritual practice and its theological implications.

The Status of Previous Apostles and Prophets

The Quran’s portrayal of biblical figures like Jesus and Abraham as Muslims (Sura 3:60; 5:48, 111) contradicts the biblical narrative. Additionally, Muhammad’s declaration as the first Muslim (Sura 39:14) conflicts with the Quran’s recognition of earlier prophets and apostles. These inconsistencies challenge the Quran’s claim of continuity with previous scriptures.

Contradictions in Salvation and Religious Exclusivity

The Quran’s stance on salvation is contradictory. Some verses suggest salvation for non-Muslims who believe in God and do righteous deeds (Sura 2:59), while others assert Islam as the only acceptable religion to God (Sura 3:79; 5:76, 77). This inconsistency poses a theological dilemma in the Islamic understanding of salvation, differing significantly from the biblical doctrine of salvation through faith in Jesus Christ.

The first part of this analysis raises critical questions about the Quran’s consistency with itself and its alignment with previous scriptures. The issues of abrogation, religious tolerance, predestination, ritual practices, the portrayal of biblical figures, and the doctrine of salvation all point to significant discrepancies within the Quran. These inconsistencies necessitate a deeper examination to understand whether the Quran can be seen as confirmatory of previous scripture or if it represents a departure from the biblical revelation.

The Quran’s Approach to Scripture and Prophecy

The Quran’s relationship with the biblical narrative is complex. It acknowledges biblical figures and events but often presents them differently. For instance, the story of Noah in the Quran (Suras 11:25-49; 23:23-30) parallels the biblical account but with variations in detail and emphasis. This raises questions about the Quran’s portrayal of biblical history and prophecy. Does it supplement, contradict, or reinterpret the biblical narrative?

The Concept of Tahrif in Islamic Theology

Tahrif, the Islamic doctrine that earlier scriptures were corrupted or altered, is crucial to understanding the Quran’s stance on the Bible. This concept is used to explain discrepancies between the Quran and the Bible. However, this raises significant questions about the historical veracity of the Quranic claims, especially given the extensive manuscript evidence supporting the Bible’s consistency over time.

The Quran and Jesus Christ

The Quran’s portrayal of Jesus Christ diverges significantly from the biblical account. While it acknowledges Jesus as a prophet and messenger, it denies His crucifixion and divinity (Sura 4:157-158). This contradicts the central Christian belief in Jesus’ death and resurrection as the cornerstone of salvation (1 Corinthians 15:3-4). How does this divergence impact the Quran’s claim to confirm previous scriptures?

Miracles and the Quran

The Quran’s approach to miracles differs from the Bible’s. While the Bible recounts numerous miracles as signs of divine authority and prophecy, the Quran generally downplays physical miracles. Instead, it often presents itself as a miracle in terms of its linguistic and literary qualities. How does this affect the Quran’s credibility compared to the miracle-laden narrative of the Bible?

Ethical and Moral Teachings

The Quran’s ethical and moral teachings are another area of comparison. While there are overlaps with biblical ethics, such as the emphasis on charity and justice, there are also notable differences. The Quran’s teachings on warfare, treatment of non-believers, and certain legal prescriptions differ from New Testament ethics centered on love and forgiveness. How do these differences reflect on the Quran’s claim of continuity with the Judeo-Christian ethical framework?

Eschatology in the Quran

The Quran’s eschatological teachings, concerning the end times and afterlife, provide another point of comparison with the Bible. While there are similarities in the belief in a final judgment and the afterlife, the descriptions and criteria for salvation and judgment exhibit notable differences. These differences raise questions about the continuity of the Quranic eschatology with biblical teachings.

The second part of this analysis highlights significant areas of divergence between the Quran and the Bible. These include the approach to scripture and prophecy, the portrayal of Jesus Christ, the role of miracles, ethical teachings, and eschatological views. These differences challenge the Quran’s claim to be a confirmatory continuation of previous scriptures, suggesting instead a distinct theological and doctrinal trajectory.

The Historical Context and Development of Quranic Teachings

Understanding the Quran’s teachings also involves examining its historical context. The Quran’s revelations spanned approximately 23 years, during which Muhammad’s circumstances transformed significantly—from a preacher in Mecca to a political and military leader in Medina. This historical evolution appears to influence the tone and content of the revelations, particularly concerning religious tolerance and warfare. For example, earlier Meccan suras tend to emphasize moral and spiritual teachings, while later Medinan suras contain more directives on social organization and warfare. This shift poses questions about the consistency and unchangeability attributed to divine revelation.

The Quran and Christian Doctrines

The Quran’s approach to key Christian doctrines is notably distinct. It explicitly denies the Trinity (Sura 5:73) and the deity of Christ (Sura 4:171). From a Christian perspective, these denials represent significant theological departures, as the deity of Christ and the concept of the Trinity are central to Christian faith. The Quran’s assertions pose a direct challenge to the consistency and continuity between the Quran and the Christian scriptures.

The Quran’s Linguistic and Literary Analysis

The Quran is often praised for its linguistic beauty and literary excellence, which some claim to be evidence of its divine origin. While appreciating its literary style, one must critically assess whether linguistic eloquence equates to divine authorship. Moreover, the Quran’s occasional obscurity, repetitions, and lack of chronological order contrast with the more historical and narrative style of the Bible. These stylistic differences raise questions about the comparability of the Quran with biblical literature.

The Influence of Pre-Islamic Sources

Scholars have noted parallels and influences from pre-Islamic sources in the Quran. Stories resembling those in the Quran are found in earlier Jewish, Christian, and even pagan sources. While Muslims may view these parallels as confirmation of a universal divine message, critics argue that they reflect the influence of existing religious and cultural narratives on the Quran.

The Challenges of Translation and Interpretation

The Quran’s translation and interpretation present additional challenges. Classical Arabic, in which the Quran is written, leaves room for various interpretations. Translations often differ significantly, affecting one’s understanding of its teachings. The challenges in translation and interpretation raise questions about the clarity and accessibility of the Quran as a guide for all humanity, in contrast to the Bible, which has been translated and understood in numerous cultural and linguistic contexts.

In conclusion, the examination of the Quran against the criteria of internal consistency, alignment with previous scriptures, historical context, and theological content reveals significant discrepancies. While the Quran claims to be a confirmatory continuation of the Judeo-Christian scriptures, its teachings on key doctrines, historical development, and literary style present a different narrative. These findings suggest that rather than confirming previous scriptures, the Quran represents a distinct theological and doctrinal path. For the Christian believer, this necessitates a discerning and critical approach to understanding the Quran in light of the foundational truths of the Bible. This analysis represents a comprehensive examination of the Quran from a conservative Evangelical Christian perspective, focusing on its claim to confirm and continue the teachings of previous scriptures.

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).