Please Help Us Keep These Thousands of Blog Posts Growing and Free for All

$5.00

Understanding how Moses gained the knowledge recorded in the book of Genesis opens many fascinating avenues for reflection and study. Genesis provides the earliest biblical account of creation, the Flood, the patriarchs, and many other foundational historical events. Yet all of them preceded Moses’ life. The question has often been raised: How could he have known the details? Did he receive them directly by divine revelation, by oral transmission from his forefathers, or by consulting already existing writings? The Scriptures themselves present enough evidence to show that each of these possibilities deserves consideration. However, they also clarify that Moses wrote under the superintendence of God’s spirit, making the Genesis account wholly reliable.

The Witness of Jesus Christ Concerning Moses

Jesus Christ affirmed that Moses was the writer of the Law, which includes Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy. Luke 24:27, 44 presents Jesus explaining “Moses and all the Prophets” and identifying “the law of Moses” as one of the components of the Hebrew Scriptures. John 5:46 records Jesus saying: “If you believed Moses, you would believe me, for he wrote about me.” Jesus’ testimony is of the highest authority, showing that Moses indeed composed Genesis under divine direction.

Yet the events in Genesis, from Adam’s creation to the end of Joseph’s life in Egypt, cover thousands of years and extend long before Moses’ birth. Moses was raised in the royal house of Pharaoh (Exodus 2:9-10). He fled to Midian (Exodus 2:15) and later returned to Egypt under divine commission (Exodus 3:10). Around 1446 B.C.E., he led the Israelites out of Egypt. It was during the subsequent wilderness period, starting in that mid-15th-century B.C.E. era, that he assembled and wrote the Pentateuch, including Genesis, over a span of years. The question remains: What were his sources for events in humanity’s early history?

Divine Revelation: The Foundation for the Unobserved Past

Genesis opens with the creation of the heavens and the earth: “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth” (Genesis 1:1). The biblical text proceeds to describe the creation of light, the separation of waters, the appearance of dry land, the creation of vegetation, and the formation of the sun, moon, and stars. It then recounts the creation of sea creatures, birds, land animals, and at last, humankind in God’s image. But no human was present to observe these events. No eyewitness could possibly have preserved the knowledge. Genesis 2:7 describes Jehovah God forming man from the dust of the ground and breathing into him the breath of life. These earliest moments of universal history must have been communicated by divine revelation. Indeed, the only way for Moses to record such events is if God himself revealed them.

This point alone shows that the opening chapters of Genesis have a revelatory nature. In fact, regardless of whether earlier patriarchs wrote partial accounts, the direct act of creation demanded special revelation from God at some point. No man was present to see the forming of the earth, nor the creation of stars, nor the origins of life. Job 38:4-6 reminds humans that they did not witness creation. Moses, or any writer who recorded it, had to rely on what God chose to disclose.

The Possibility of Oral Tradition

After the creation of man, the story of Adam, Eve, the Garden of Eden, and the subsequent experiences of humankind could have been preserved in different ways. One method often proposed is oral tradition. Ancient men lived remarkably long lives, especially in the pre-Flood world. Genesis 5 shows that Adam lived 930 years, Seth 912 years, Enosh 905 years, Kenan 910 years, Mahalalel 895 years, Jared 962 years, Methuselah 969 years, Lamech 777 years, and Noah 950 years. Even after the Flood, the genealogies indicate individuals lived for many centuries (Genesis 11:10-25).

Such longevity allowed for extensive oral transmission with very few links between early humanity and Moses. The usual illustration is that Adam could have related the account of creation to, among others, Methuselah. Methuselah overlapped with Shem, who then lived down to the time of Abraham. Shem overlapped with Isaac, Isaac overlapped with Levi, Levi overlapped with Amram, and Amram was Moses’ father. Because these individuals had lengthy life spans, it would have taken only a handful of “links” to connect Adam and Moses. By that chain of memory, the core historical events from Adam onward could have been kept intact.

Skeptics sometimes doubt the possibility of accurate oral transmission over so many centuries. However, from the standpoint of the believer who accepts that early man was closer to perfection and had an outstanding memory, this method is plausible. Moreover, given the importance of these events, the stories would have been guarded carefully. Yet even if oral tradition accounts for much of the historical knowledge, the earliest chapters about pre-human creation must have come by revelation. No matter how faithful an oral tradition might be, none but Jehovah God could have provided the details of what happened before man existed.

The Possibility of Earlier Written Documents

Many conservative scholars note that writing is very ancient. Genesis 4:17 indicates that Cain built a city. Genesis 4:21 mentions the development of musical instruments, and Genesis 4:22 speaks of the forging of iron and copper tools. If such arts and skills were present in the first generations of humankind, the art of writing could easily have arisen as well. There is no reason to believe that the earliest people were incapable of developing written language, especially given their closer proximity to perfection and their long lifespans. Archeology shows that writing on clay tablets and other media existed in Sumer, Akkad, and elsewhere far earlier than many critics once assumed. While secular scholarship often suggests certain forms of writing date back millennia before Moses, their methods of dating can be uncertain. Nevertheless, the presence of ancient cuneiform, hieroglyphics, and other scripts confirms that writing is a practice that originated at a distant time.

The Bible itself never directly claims that pre-Flood generations wrote their histories. However, that possibility remains strong. Likewise, after the Flood, the genealogies from Shem down to Abraham (Genesis 11:10-32) might have been recorded contemporaneously in written form. If so, Moses could have drawn upon such extant documents when compiling Genesis. Some who hold this view reference the repeated phrase in Genesis, often translated “these are the generations of,” or better, “this is the history of” (Hebrew toledoth). Genesis 2:4 reads: “This is the history of the heavens and the earth.” Genesis 5:1 says: “This is the book of the history of Adam.” Others appear in Genesis 6:9; 10:1; 11:10; 11:27; 25:12; 25:19; 36:1; 36:9; 37:2. Some see these phrases as colophons typical of ancient Mesopotamian tablets, in which a concluding statement identified the person who wrote or owned the tablet. They propose that Adam, Noah, Shem, Terah, Ishmael, Isaac, Esau, and Jacob might have been authors or possessors of tablets that recorded genealogies and events, eventually handed down to Moses.

Yet caution is warranted. A straightforward reading of these phrases shows that each toledoth statement does not necessarily serve as a concluding formula. In some passages, it is used as an introduction to a genealogical or historical account. For instance, Genesis 5:1 says, “This is the book of the history of Adam,” and then proceeds to provide Adam’s genealogical line. In other places, the words appear to introduce the records about the patriarch or group named. For example, Genesis 37:2 states: “This is the history of Jacob,” and then continues to focus primarily on the story of Joseph, which was still intimately tied to Jacob’s household. This suggests the phrase can function as a heading or transitional formula, not necessarily as a colophon from older tablets. Nonetheless, it does not exclude the possibility that some family archives existed. It merely means the text of Genesis does not explicitly say so.

One objection is that if Ishmael, who was dismissed from Abraham’s household, or Esau, who disdained spiritual matters, had possessed such lengthy records about God’s covenant people, that would be unlikely. Ishmael’s lineage (Genesis 25:12-18) and Esau’s line (Genesis 36) appear to show that they were not primarily concerned with the outworking of Jehovah’s purpose. It would be strange if they preserved the greatest trove of patriarchal knowledge. For this reason, many deem it improbable that these men authored or stored the majority of the primeval and patriarchal histories.

Nonetheless, there is no definitive reason to conclude that no earlier written records contributed anything to Moses’ final composition. The text itself does not categorically rule out the existence of genealogies, personal records, or historical notes kept by the faithful. Moses may have had access to them, especially if they were cherished and handed down by individuals like Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Joseph, who valued Jehovah’s dealings. The key point is that the biblical text remains silent on how much of that earlier writing Moses might have consulted.

The Function of the ‘History of’ (Toledoth) Expressions In Genesis

In the Hebrew text of Genesis, the word toledoth occurs repeatedly, rendered by some as “the generations of,” or as “this is the history of,” or “this is the account of.” Observers have noted that the Greek Septuagint uses the term genesis for toledoth, giving the sense of “origins” or “history.” Many interpreters argue that these repeated headings shape the structure of Genesis, dividing it into distinct sections. For instance, Genesis 2:4 transitions from the overall creation narrative to a focused account of man’s creation and the events that unfolded in Eden. Genesis 5:1 transitions to the written account of Adam’s line. Genesis 6:9 introduces the story of Noah, and so forth. These toledoth statements consistently serve as organizational markers, reflecting the writer’s method of segmenting a vast historical narrative.

Archaeologist P. J. Wiseman and others suggested that the toledoth expression might indicate the close of a section, akin to colophons in ancient Mesopotamian literature. However, a close analysis of the content around these occurrences in Genesis shows that each toledoth often launches the subsequent narrative or genealogy, rather than concluding the preceding text. This usage is flexible in Hebrew narrative, so one cannot be dogmatic that they are all colophons of older clay tablets. Still, it remains a matter of debate among some historians and theologians.

Regardless of these structural observations, the book of Genesis plainly aims to provide an unbroken record from the dawn of creation to Joseph’s death. The toledoth statements highlight transitions in focus, so that the reader can follow the major developments in God’s dealings with humanity and his chosen line, leading eventually to Israel’s formation as a nation.

The Reliance of Moses on God’s Spirit

God’s Word, as recorded in the New Testament, reveals that prophecy was never produced by human will alone; men spoke from God as they were carried along by holy spirit (2 Peter 1:21). This principle applies to Moses’ composition of Genesis. Whatever methods he employed—be they earlier documents, oral traditions from his ancestors, or new direct revelations—he did so under the guidance of God’s spirit. That ensures that the text is divinely inspired and free from error. Jesus’ own references to events in Genesis confirm that he regarded that material as entirely trustworthy history (Matthew 19:4-5; 24:37-39).

Whether Moses consulted genealogical tables from Abraham or from the family of Isaac, or whether he was granted fresh revelations, or whether he inherited a mixture of tradition and writings from older patriarchs, the final product stands as “inspired of God” (2 Timothy 3:16). In that sense, the immediate source is less vital than the truthfulness guaranteed by Jehovah’s active guidance.

The Transmission From Adam to Moses Through Oral Links

An oft-discussed scenario involves the fact that Adam could have spoken to Methuselah for many centuries, since Adam lived 930 years and Methuselah lived 969 years. Methuselah, overlapping with Noah for six hundred years, could have conveyed the account of creation and early history to Noah. After the Flood, Shem survived for many centuries and overlapped with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. In that chain of extremely long life spans, very few individuals would be needed to pass along the entire pre-Flood and immediate post-Flood story from Adam until the time of Jacob or beyond. Moses, born around the 16th century B.C.E., is only a few genealogical steps removed from those who could have heard the account from the earliest ancestors. Genesis 11:10-32 reveals Shem outlived many generations of his descendants, so the possibility of direct communication across centuries is striking.

In modern times, many are accustomed to shortened life spans and advanced technology, and might doubt that an oral chain of tradition could remain precise. But the Bible details that pre-Flood and early post-Flood patriarchs had extraordinary longevity. They valued these accounts about God’s interactions with humankind, especially with faithful men who called upon Jehovah’s name (Genesis 4:26). Ancient cultures put a high premium on memorization, so crucial accounts of origins would be transmitted with extreme care. While no believer would rely on oral tradition alone for events prior to man’s creation, which had to be revealed by God, the genealogical and historical details following Adam’s appearance could indeed have been preserved reliably in that manner.

The Case for Earlier Tablets or Written Records

Another theory championed by some scholars involves the possibility that men like Adam, Enoch, Noah, Shem, Abraham, Isaac, or Jacob composed written records under divine inspiration, so that Moses became their compiler. In that scenario, Genesis is not purely Mosaic authorship from scratch, but a divinely superintended editorial process in which Moses took older documents, carefully wove them together, and added bridging material where necessary. This might explain certain changes in style or perspective that some readers detect in different parts of Genesis.

Proponents of this view cite parallels with later books of the Old Testament where references are made to external sources, like “the Book of the Wars of Jehovah” (Numbers 21:14) or “the Book of Jashar” (Joshua 10:13). These references show that inspired writers were sometimes guided to incorporate or reference earlier records. Similarly, 1 and 2 Kings mention “the Book of the Chronicles of the Kings of Israel” (1 Kings 14:19) and “the Book of the Chronicles of the Kings of Judah” (1 Kings 14:29), indicating that official documents existed and that biblical authors occasionally drew upon them for factual data. The same principle may have been at work in the composition of Genesis, though dealing with even more ancient times.

Still, while such an approach is possible, it is not directly stated in the text of Genesis. The repeated “this is the history of” might function as a structural device and not necessarily as a reference to older clay tablets. The mention of genealogies can be integrated into a single inspired narrative without requiring the actual presence of multiple written sources. The entire project may simply reflect one overarching divine revelation that Moses, as God’s prophet, carefully recorded.

Why Ishmael and Esau Are Unlikely Archivists

Some who propose that each toledoth is a colophon believe that Ishmael or Esau wrote the lengthy sections on Abraham’s dealings, Isaac’s experiences, and Jacob’s life, then appended their own genealogies. This scenario seems implausible. Ishmael was dismissed early from Abraham’s household (Genesis 21:14) and led a separate life in the wilderness. Esau displayed no inclination toward sacred matters (Hebrews 12:16). It would be bizarre to imagine these men meticulously preserving the prime historical record that dealt with a covenant from which they excluded themselves by choice or circumstance. More likely is that the references to Ishmael’s or Esau’s lineage serve as transitional notes to show how those lines diverged from God’s covenant line, rather than signifying that they wrote or owned major portions of Genesis.

Events Surrounding Abraham and Written Laws

Some also point to Genesis 26:5, which says that Abraham obeyed Jehovah’s “voice” and “kept his charge, his commandments, his statutes, and his laws.” This might indicate that at least some of God’s instructions to Abraham were in written form, as the Hebrew term for statutes (chuqqim) often implies something engraved or set. Yet the text does not definitively say Abraham penned them. Nevertheless, the notion that the patriarchs kept records of God’s dealings is not far-fetched. They showed deep respect for God’s covenants, built altars, and taught their children to observe divine commands. The environment was conducive to preserving God’s words faithfully, be it orally or in writing.

How Archaeological Evidence Relates to Genesis

Archaeological finds in Mesopotamia, Canaan, and Egypt reveal that writing is extremely old. While secular scholars debate exact dates, the fact remains that cuneiform tablets, Egyptian hieroglyphic records, and other inscriptions were used to record laws, genealogies, and historical events in the third millennium B.C.E. or earlier. The fact that advanced civilizations used writing so long ago means the patriarchs had ample opportunity to do the same. The notion of Abraham leaving Ur of the Chaldeans around the early second millennium B.C.E. (some place it around 2000 B.C.E.) suggests he came from a region that was a hub of literacy. He or members of his family might well have possessed genealogies stretching back to Shem, and even possibly beyond. The Bible does not confirm it, but it is consistent with known historical contexts.

No archaeological inscription has been found conclusively referencing Adam, Noah, Shem, or Abraham in a manner that parallels Genesis. Some Mesopotamian epics mention a great flood and a boat builder, but these accounts deviate in theological perspective and details. While these traditions vaguely mirror the biblical record, they often contain polytheistic elements. The reliability of Scripture stands out in contrast. The fact that some ancient cultures possessed flood accounts does not prove they wrote or preserved the biblical narrative, only that the memory of the flood was widespread. Moses’ final text in Genesis remains the unique, inspired telling of those events.

The Flood’s Impact on Historical Sources

The global flood of 2348-2347 B.C.E. (according to biblical chronology) would have destroyed any manuscripts that existed prior to that cataclysm. For any to have survived, they would have had to be taken aboard the ark with Noah. But the Scriptures do not say that happened. If the patriarchs or their forefathers wrote accounts before the flood, and if Noah preserved them, they could have passed them to Shem, who then bequeathed them down the line until eventually they reached Moses. Another possibility is that any pre-Flood knowledge that existed was re-recorded after the flood from memory or by divine revelation. The text does not specify. What it does specify is that the flood reset civilization so thoroughly that the line of knowledge passing from Adam’s generation had to rely on the eight survivors on the ark (Genesis 7:13). That is yet another reason to see a strong role for revelation, especially if certain details about Eden and early genealogies needed precise preservation.

Joseph’s Remaining Time In Egypt and the Preservation of Jacob’s History

Genesis concludes with Jacob’s death and the account of Joseph’s subsequent actions in Egypt (Genesis 49:29–50:26). Moses lived centuries after those events. The biblical record places the Exodus at 1446 B.C.E., while Jacob had gone down to Egypt around 1728 B.C.E. and died there seventeen years later. Joseph eventually died at 110 years old (Genesis 50:26), which was around 1610 B.C.E. The gap between Joseph’s death and Moses’ birth was roughly a few decades, though the exact chronology can be debated within a small range. Still, it was not so vast that accurate knowledge could not be preserved. The tribe of Levi, from which Moses descended, carried forward these stories, and Joseph’s request that his bones be carried out of Egypt at the time of the Exodus (Genesis 50:24-25) shows the continuing awareness among the Israelites of their heritage and God’s promises.

God’s Guiding Hand In Inspiration

The central conviction held by faithful readers is that God superintended the writing of Genesis. Moses, revered as a prophet, would not rely solely on fragile human recollections for the foundational narratives of God’s dealings with humankind. Jehovah’s spirit would guarantee that any accounts—written or oral—were selected and woven together in a flawless manner (2 Peter 1:21). This underscores that the finished text, read by millions of believers throughout the ages, is precisely what God intended to convey. In other words, the immediate source, whether older documents, oral tradition, or direct revelation, becomes secondary compared to the abiding truth that Genesis stands as part of the inspired Word of God.

Considerations for the Faithful Reader

When the New Testament writers and Jesus himself refer to the creation account, the events of the flood, and the experiences of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, they treat Genesis as genuine history. Matthew 24:37-39 records Jesus likening the time of his return to “the days of Noah,” taking for granted that the Noahic account was factual. Romans 5:14 speaks of Adam in the context of explaining sin and redemption, and Hebrews 11 extols Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and others for their faith, using Genesis as the foundation of those men’s examples. This is powerful internal testimony that the earliest records in Scripture are recognized as trustworthy and that Moses’ authorship is accepted as part of God’s revelatory plan.

A faithful Christian, therefore, sees no conflict between acknowledging possible human means of transmission—oral or written—and insisting that the final form is fully God-breathed. Indeed, the final result is what matters most. God oversaw the process and gave humankind a clear, accurate record from the earliest times of the universe’s history to the formation of Israel as God’s covenant people. This is entirely consistent with the biblical narrative that depicts God as intimately involved in guiding his prophets.

How Jesus and the Apostle Viewed Genesis

Jesus, in Matthew 19:4-5, quotes from Genesis 1:27 and 2:24, affirming the creation of man and woman and the divine institution of marriage. Jesus uses these passages as the basis for teaching on marriage and divorce, showing that he viewed Genesis as carrying the authority of God’s Word. This implies that Jesus believed the events in Genesis 1 and 2 were reliable and that the scriptural record was entirely trustworthy, originating under God’s oversight.

Similarly, Paul’s arguments in Romans 5:12-21 rest on the historicity of Adam’s creation and fall. Paul’s teaching about Christ being the “last Adam” is predicated on the Genesis account being factual. Hebrews 11 references Abel, Enoch, Noah, Abraham, Sarah, Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, and others, all found in Genesis, reaffirming that the events recorded in that book were accepted as genuine history. These references across the New Testament illustrate that the earliest chapters of the Bible were never considered myth, nor were they approached with modern skepticism. Instead, they were treated as foundational truth.

The Ultimate Significance of Divine Inspiration

Some might ask why it matters whether Moses used oral tradition, older writings, or direct revelation. It matters because we treasure the integrity of God’s Word. Yet the decisive factor is that God’s spirit superintended the entire process. The text is not an amalgamation of myths or secondhand folklore; it is the inspired narrative of real events that shape salvation history. The personal experiences of Adam, Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Joseph are recounted with a seriousness that points to genuine historical occurrence. The genealogies that link Adam to Noah, Noah to Abraham, and Abraham to the twelve sons of Jacob are presented as the real lineage leading to the nation of Israel.

What it means for believers is that Genesis is part of the foundation upon which the entire scriptural revelation stands. Genesis sets the stage for humanity’s fall into sin, the promise of redemption, and the establishment of God’s covenant with Abraham, which ultimately leads to the Messiah. If the opening chapters of Genesis were not accurate or were purely symbolic, the theology of the rest of Scripture would be undermined. Consequently, acknowledging Moses as the inspired author, while recognizing that God could have employed multiple means to convey information, strengthens one’s confidence in the unity and reliability of the biblical account.

Conclusion: Assurance Amidst the Historical Mystery

Whether Moses gained the material for Genesis from pre-Flood or post-Flood documents, from carefully preserved oral traditions, or from direct revelation, the key conclusion remains that the Holy Spirit guided him to write a truthful record. The abiding significance lies in Genesis being fully authoritative as God’s Word. There is no scriptural requirement to choose one exclusive method by which Moses received every detail. Perhaps all three channels played a role in various ways. The message stands: from primeval creation to Joseph’s final days in Egypt, the record is trustworthy.

Modern readers can rest assured that Genesis is not a patchwork of legend or questionable tradition. Jesus Christ and the apostles revered it as authoritative. The events that predate Moses’ life are reliably conveyed because God’s spirit ensured that Moses’ writing was flawless in its portrayal of divine truth. Meanwhile, numerous references within Genesis and other biblical books confirm that writing was widespread and that genealogies and covenants were diligently preserved. The biblical genealogical framework from Adam through Noah to Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and beyond is set out carefully and purposefully, culminating in the formation of the nation from which the Messiah would come.

Far from diminishing the spiritual power of Genesis, exploring these questions about Moses’ sources can enhance one’s appreciation for the intricacy of divine providence. Jehovah ensured that his faithful worshippers, from the earliest days, had access to the truths vital for their spiritual life. When the time was right, he raised up Moses, who became both the great prophet and the compiler of Israel’s earliest written Scripture. Through Moses, the Israelites—and eventually all mankind—received the foundational narrative of how the world came to be, how sin entered, how God acted in grace, and how the line of promise progressed toward ultimate redemption.

God’s plan did not begin with Moses, but Moses faithfully transmitted all that mankind needs to know about those ancient ages. That is why the first book of Scripture is called “Genesis,” signifying “origins” or “beginnings.” By the time of the Exodus in 1446 B.C.E., Israel possessed a completed record of God’s redemptive plan’s groundwork. The Book of Genesis stands as a monument to divine revelation, serving as an unshakeable basis for all the rest of biblical history and prophecy. Whether through direct revelation, ancestral tradition, existing writings, or a blend of all three, Moses set forth the truths of beginnings, guided by the spirit of God. The final result is what truly counts—an inspired testament, shaping believers’ faith through the ages.

You May Also Enjoy

What Is the Role of Jesus Christ as the Mediator of Salvation?

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).