GENESIS 46:4: Did God Bring Jacob out of Egypt or Did He Die There?

Please Help Us Keep These Thousands of Blog Posts Free for All

$5.00

Introduction to the Alleged Difficulty

Genesis 46:4 presents a divine promise from Jehovah to Jacob: “I myself will go down with you to Egypt, and I myself will also bring you back from there, and Joseph will lay his hand on your eyes.” This statement raises a question in the minds of many Bible readers, especially in light of Genesis 49:33: “When Jacob finished instructing his sons he drew his feet up to the bed and breathed his last, and was gathered to his people.” That Jacob died in Egypt seems unequivocal. The critical point of tension, then, lies in whether Genesis 46:4 was a failed personal promise to Jacob, or whether its fulfillment lies in a broader or even symbolic sense. Was Jacob ever “brought back” from Egypt?

We will examine this difficulty within the framework of a high view of Scripture and a literal, grammatical-historical method of interpretation, maintaining that the biblical text is inerrant and consistent when rightly understood. There are no contradictions in Scripture; only misunderstandings or incomplete understandings on our part. Thus, we approach this question seeking harmony in the text, without appeal to critical methodologies or liberal hermeneutical constructs.

Historical and Literary Context of Genesis 46:4

Jacob was approximately 130 years old when he went down into Egypt (Genesis 47:9), which would place the year at approximately 1876 B.C.E. This was during a time of severe famine in the land of Canaan (Genesis 45:11), and Joseph, his son, had already been established as a high official in Egypt under Pharaoh. Jehovah reassured Jacob in a vision at Beersheba before his descent, affirming both divine presence and a future return: “Do not be afraid to go down to Egypt, for there I will make you into a great nation. I myself will go down with you to Egypt, and I myself will also bring you back from there, and Joseph will lay his hand on your eyes” (Genesis 46:3–4, UASV).

The reassurance had three prongs:

God’s presence in Egypt: This was immediate and personal—Jehovah would go with Jacob into Egypt.
National prosperity: Jacob’s descendants would become a great nation there.
A future return: Jehovah declared, “I myself will also bring you back from there.”

This third element is where the interpretive tension arises. How was Jacob “brought back” when the narrative clearly records his death in Egypt?

Genesis 46:4 and the Nature of the Promise

A careful syntactical and grammatical analysis of the Hebrew in Genesis 46:4 is crucial. The clause “and I myself will also bring you back from there” (וְאָנֹכִי אַעַלְךָ גַם־עָלֹה) uses the hiphil imperfect form of the verb עָלָה (‘alah), which conveys causation—“to cause to go up” or “bring up.” The object here is second-person singular, directed at Jacob personally. On its face, the verse implies that Jacob himself is the beneficiary of this “bringing back.”

However, we must balance this with the immediate context (v. 3), which emphasizes the national aspect of the promise: “I will make you into a great nation.” The entire sequence is covenantal and forward-looking, deeply rooted in the Abrahamic promises of land and progeny (cf. Genesis 12:1–3; 15:13–16; 28:13–15). Therefore, a broader fulfillment is not only legitimate but necessitated by the context.

But was there also a personal fulfillment for Jacob in any meaningful sense?

The Death of Jacob and the Transportation of His Body

Genesis 49:33 plainly states that Jacob died in Egypt. However, Genesis 50:1–14 narrates an extensive and deliberate process of embalming and transporting Jacob’s remains back to Canaan. Joseph honored his father’s dying wish, first appealing to Pharaoh, then organizing a grand funeral procession that carried Jacob’s body to the burial site in the cave of Machpelah—the same burial place as Abraham and Isaac (Genesis 50:13). The journey from Egypt to Canaan was not perfunctory. It involved a great mourning company, Egyptian officials, and a long lamentation period at the threshing floor of Atad (Genesis 50:10–11).

This return of Jacob’s body to Canaan is not incidental; it is narratively highlighted and ceremonially emphasized. That Moses recorded this so thoroughly signals that this return was understood by both the family and the covenant community as significant. Thus, while Jacob himself did not live again in Canaan in his lifetime, he was indeed “brought back” in a way that honored both his person and the patriarchal promises.

Canonical Cross-References and Theological Harmony

This theme of bones and bodily return is not unique to Jacob. Joseph, too, made the sons of Israel swear that his bones would be carried up from Egypt (Genesis 50:25). Exodus 13:19 records the fulfillment of this oath: “Moses took the bones of Joseph with him.” Similarly, the patriarchs’ desire to be buried in Canaan reflects their covenantal hope in the promises of God. Hebrews 11:13–16 confirms that these men of faith died without receiving the promises but saw them from afar and welcomed them, acknowledging that they were strangers and exiles on the earth.

Thus, the return of Jacob’s body is not a theological triviality—it is an act of faith and a covenantal sign. Jacob was not abandoned in Egypt. Jehovah, by ensuring Jacob’s honored burial in the Promised Land, fulfilled his word in a literal yet posthumous sense.

Moreover, Jehovah’s statement “I myself will bring you back” is best understood within the semantic range of “returning” not limited to temporal life but encompassing covenantal faithfulness. In Hebrew idiom, bringing someone back (especially posthumously) was still considered a fulfillment of promise (cf. 2 Samuel 19:38; 1 Kings 13:30).

Future Resurrection and Ultimate Fulfillment

Another dimension to consider is the eschatological. The Hebrew understanding of death and hope included the future resurrection of the righteous (cf. Job 14:14; Daniel 12:2). Jacob himself expressed faith in the promises of God concerning the land and the blessing to come through his descendants (Genesis 48:4; 49:10). Thus, Jehovah’s promise to Jacob may also include an ultimate fulfillment upon resurrection, when Jacob will truly live again in the land that was promised to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.

In that light, Jehovah’s statement in Genesis 46:4 has three layers of fulfillment:

Immediate: God went with Jacob into Egypt, sustaining him and his family.
Posthumous: Jacob’s body was literally brought back to the land of Canaan and buried with his fathers.
Eschatological: Jacob will be resurrected to live in the land promised to him, in accordance with God’s immutable covenant.

Objections and Clarifications

Some might argue that the second-person singular in Genesis 46:4 mandates a living return of Jacob, and that a burial return is insufficient. However, the biblical usage of such language often includes corporate and representative meanings. In Genesis 15:13–16, for instance, Abraham’s descendants are described collectively, and the fourth generation is said to return. Similarly, God’s covenant dealings with individuals often telescope into national and prophetic dimensions.

Others may propose that this indicates an error or unfulfilled promise. This is an incorrect reading of the text, stemming from a narrow understanding of “bring you back.” The record of Genesis 50 makes it unmistakably clear that the writer (under inspiration) saw the burial of Jacob in Canaan as a pivotal event—a fulfillment of prior words and oaths.

There is no need to resort to symbolic interpretations or to suggest that this promise failed. Jehovah does not lie (Numbers 23:19), nor does he make conditional statements when the text clearly speaks with declarative finality.

Conclusion: Faithful to the Text and the Promise

When all the textual, contextual, and theological factors are considered, Genesis 46:4 is fully consistent with the later statement of Jacob’s death in Genesis 49:33. Jehovah did indeed bring Jacob back from Egypt:

Literally, by the transport of his embalmed body to Canaan and its interment in the patriarchal tomb.
Covenantally, by maintaining his promises to Jacob and his descendants.
Eschatologically, by assuring a future resurrection in which Jacob will inhabit the land promised to his forefathers.

This tri-fold fulfillment aligns with both the character of God and the nature of biblical prophecy, which often unfolds in layers across generations. Thus, there is no contradiction in the biblical record—only a depth of meaning that reflects the consistent faithfulness of Jehovah to those who walk in covenant with him.

You May Also Benefit From

How Can We Reconcile Difficult Doctrinal Passages While Staying True to Biblical Truth?

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).