Please Help Us Keep These Thousands of Blog Posts Free for All

$5.00

Examining the Claim of a Third Inspired Revelation

The question of whether the Quran is the third installment of the inspired, inerrant Word of God is central to understanding Islamic claims and evaluating them in light of the Bible. Christians recognize the Hebrew Old Testament and the Greek New Testament as the complete, fully inspired, and inerrant Word of God, all sixty-six books being authoritative and harmonious. It is necessary to consider that Muslims view the Quran as a divinely revealed message, delivered over about twenty-three years of Muhammad’s life (about 609–632 C.E.), allegedly confirming earlier revelations given to Moses, David, and Jesus. Muslims hold the Quran to be the final and ultimate revelation, superseding what they consider to be previous scriptures that were once pure but now corrupted. They claim that the Quran brings to completion the message first revealed in the Torah and the Gospel, making it the culminating revelation.

This is a significant claim. For the Quran to be the third installment of the inspired, inerrant Word of God, it must carry the same divine authority and authenticity as the Old and New Testaments. It must be in doctrinal harmony with these earlier, historically confirmed Scriptures. The God of the Bible is not a God of confusion. (1 Corinthians 14:33) The Bible itself bears witness that the Scriptures were inspired and that men were moved along by the Holy Spirit to record God’s message. (2 Timothy 3:16; 2 Peter 1:21) If the Quran is truly the Word of God, then it would confirm and agree with the divine truths found in the earlier revelations. It would not contradict or radically depart from what God had revealed in his Word. Instead, it would logically stand as an extension of that same truth and teaching.

The Bible, composed over 1,600 years by some forty-plus authors from various walks of life, displays remarkable internal harmony. From Genesis, written about 1513 B.C.E., to Revelation, completed about 98 C.E., there is no genuine contradiction in its original text. Jesus himself stated to the Jewish leaders that the Scriptures bore witness to him (John 5:39 UASV). The apostle Paul praised the Beroeans for examining the Scriptures daily to ensure that his teachings aligned with God’s Word (Acts 17:11 UASV). Paul told young Timothy that the sacred writings could make one wise for salvation (2 Timothy 3:14-17 UASV). From the first book of Genesis to the final book of Revelation, the Bible is consistent and trustworthy. The New Testament confirms the authenticity of the Old Testament. If the Quran were from the same divine source, it should also confirm the earlier Scriptures by showing doctrinal and moral harmony.

The Absence of the Divine Name and Other Foundational Issues

In the Old Testament, God’s personal name, represented by the Hebrew letters (JHVH), appears nearly seven thousand times. The Hebrew text uses Jehovah (Exodus 3:15; Isaiah 42:8 UASV). The New Testament authors were aware of the importance of the divine name, and Jesus emphasized the name of his Father (John 17:6 UASV). The preservation of this name in Scripture is deeply significant. For believers, the name Jehovah is a strong tower of refuge (Proverbs 18:10 UASV). It is an everlasting name by which God’s people know him (Psalm 83:18 UASV).

If the Quran were truly a confirmation of God’s earlier revelations, one would expect it to uphold the divine name. The Quran, however, does not mention the personal divine name Jehovah at all. Instead, it speaks of Allah, which is not a personal name but the Arabic word for God. This is a foundational inconsistency. The divine name given in the Hebrew Scriptures should have been retained or recognized if the Quran were indeed from the same divine source. The absence of God’s personal name in the Quran stands as an immediate red flag regarding its claim to confirm earlier revelation.

Original Sin and the Fall of Man

The biblical account in Genesis shows how sin entered into the world through the first human couple, Adam and Eve (Genesis 2:16-17; 3:6; 3:19 UASV). The entire Old Testament narrative and the New Testament revelation consistently teach that Adam’s sin and its consequences were passed on to all humankind. (Psalm 51:5; Romans 5:12; 1 Corinthians 15:21-22 UASV) Thus, all humans inherit sin and imperfection and need salvation. The Bible is unwavering on this truth: every human after Adam is born into imperfection and sinfulness. No one is righteous on his own. Jesus’ ransom sacrifice is necessary for salvation (Matthew 20:28; Romans 6:23; John 3:16 UASV).

In contrast, the Quran denies the doctrine of original sin, asserting instead that humans are born morally pure and that Adam’s sin was forgiven by Allah. (Quran 2:37; 20:121-122) According to the Quran, there is no inherited sinfulness that requires a redemptive sacrifice. This contradicts the unbroken biblical teaching that all descendants of Adam are sinners in need of redemption. The Quran’s teaching on this fundamental point of salvation history is completely at odds with the Bible. If the Quran were truly a confirmation of previous Scripture, it would not deny the foundational doctrine of original sin and the resulting need for the Savior.

The Doctrine of Salvation

From Genesis through Revelation, the Bible makes it abundantly clear that salvation is a gift from God through faith in Jesus Christ, not something that can be earned by human works. No fallen human can justify himself before God by adherence to any law or by personal merit. (Ephesians 2:8-9; Romans 3:20; 3:27-28; Galatians 2:16 UASV) Jesus came to give his life as a ransom for many, opening the way to salvation by faith, not by works. While genuine faith will produce good works (James 2:14-26 UASV), the works themselves do not earn salvation; they are a result of saving faith.

The Quran promotes a different concept of salvation, teaching that individuals must earn their salvation by doing righteous deeds and obeying Allah’s commands. The Quran states that those who believe and do good deeds will be rewarded and have their sins forgiven by Allah. This teaching reduces salvation to a system of merit-based acceptance and stands in stark contradiction to the Bible’s insistence that salvation comes through God’s grace and not through works of any law. The very core of the Gospel message is that humans cannot earn their salvation; they must humbly accept the undeserved kindness that God shows through Christ’s sacrificial death. The Quran’s idea of meritorious salvation is irreconcilable with the Christian Scriptures.

The Identity and Role of Jesus Christ

The Bible testifies that Jesus is the Son of God (Mark 1:1 UASV), the promised Messiah (Isaiah 53; John 1:29 UASV), and the only pathway to the Father (John 14:6 UASV). He is the one whose sacrifice makes possible the forgiveness of sins and reconciliation with God. The New Testament, supported by prophecies in the Old Testament, makes it abundantly clear that Jesus died and rose from the dead, that he is fully divine and is God’s appointed mediator. (Philippians 2:5-11; Acts 4:12; Romans 10:9 UASV)

The Quran, however, denies that Jesus is the Son of God. It rejects his divine sonship and his atoning sacrifice. It also denies that he actually died on the cross and rose from the dead. The Quran’s portrayal of Jesus reduces him to a prophet only, removing the fundamental salvific role that the entire New Testament proclaims. If the Quran were truly from the same God who revealed the Old and New Testaments, it would not repudiate the most central figure of the Christian faith and the heart of the Gospel message. Instead, it would affirm the truth of his death and resurrection, which were attested by numerous witnesses (1 Corinthians 15:3-8 UASV). This glaring contradiction dismantles any notion that the Quran upholds and confirms the earlier Scriptures.

Satan, the Superhuman Adversary

The Bible consistently identifies Satan the Devil as a rebellious angel who turned against Jehovah and misled humankind into sin. (Genesis 3:1-5; Job 1:8-11; Isaiah 14:12-15; John 8:44; Revelation 12:9 UASV) Scripture shows him as a powerful but ultimately defeated foe whose final judgment is assured. This teaching is central to understanding the spiritual conflict narrated throughout Scripture.

The Quran, however, states that Satan is not a fallen angel but a fallen Jinn, a being made of smokeless fire who refused to obey Allah’s command to bow before Adam. This difference may seem small, but it represents a fundamental break in the continuity of divine revelation. If the Quran were confirming the Bible, it would agree on so central a truth as the nature and identity of God’s chief Adversary. Instead, it introduces a radically different understanding, again demonstrating that it is not a faithful continuation of earlier Scripture.

The Absence of Miracles, Prophecies, and Scriptural Harmony

The Bible’s authenticity and divine inspiration are supported by fulfilled prophecy, historical reliability, and eyewitness accounts. The Old Testament prophesied the coming Messiah, including specific details about his lineage and birthplace (Micah 5:2; Isaiah 7:14; Isaiah 53 UASV). The New Testament writers presented numerous eyewitnesses to the miracles of Jesus, his death, and his bodily resurrection. These prophecies and miracles serve as divine confirmation that the Scriptures are from God and can be trusted.

The Quran, however, offers no such external confirmation. It does not present verifiable prophecies that came to pass in history with the same clarity and historical backing as the Bible. It does not report miracles that can be attested by reliable witnesses, and it provides no internal evidence of the kind that distinguishes the Bible. Some Muslims claim the Quran itself is a literary miracle, yet this is not verifiable. The literary quality and structure of the Quran do not surpass and confirm the inspiration and trustworthiness of the earlier Scriptures. In fact, many who have studied the Quran have noted the disordered presentation of its content and the linguistic irregularities that challenge the idea of a perfect Arabic text.

If the Quran truly were the next step in God’s revelation, the same God who declared, “I am Jehovah, that is my name” (Isaiah 42:8 UASV) and gave extensive prophetic signs in the Bible, would have provided some manner of objective confirmation. Instead, the Quran lacks the hallmarks that would identify it as a continuation of the Bible’s inspired message.

The Question of Textual Corruption

Muslim apologists often assert that the reason the Quran differs from the Bible is that Jews and Christians allegedly corrupted the biblical text over time. The claim is that the Bible as it exists today does not reflect what was originally revealed. However, there is a historical and textual problem with this assertion. By the time the Quran was being compiled in the seventh century C.E., the textual tradition of the Old and New Testaments was already well established. Manuscripts of the Greek New Testament and the Hebrew Old Testament had been widely copied and disseminated. Had there been any widespread corruption, it would have to have happened centuries before the Quran appeared.

Yet, the Quran itself speaks of the earlier Scriptures in a way that confirms their divine origin. It states that the Torah and the Gospel were given by God as guidance and light. If the Quran affirms those Scriptures in the seventh century C.E., it affirms them as being reliable and authoritative at that time. Modern textual criticism has confirmed that we can recover the original wording of the Bible’s text to a profound degree of accuracy. Thousands of manuscripts, ancient versions, and citations by early church fathers allow us to confirm that the Bible’s text has been faithfully transmitted, despite minor copyist errors. These minor variants do not alter fundamental doctrines, and the overall text of the Bible has remained remarkably stable.

The Muslim claim that the Bible became corrupt to the point of losing its original message fails to account for historical evidence. Such corruption would have been impossible to carry out undetected across the vast geographical spread of Christian and Jewish communities. Furthermore, if the Bible had been corrupt at the time of the Quran’s writing, then the Quran’s own affirmation of the previous Scriptures would be self-defeating. This contradiction undermines the Quran’s credibility.

The reality is that the integrity of the biblical text has been carefully preserved. The Quran, rather than confirming God’s prior revelations, sets forth doctrines and narratives that contradict the Bible. Thus, the problem does not lie in biblical corruption. It lies in the Quran’s failure to align with the earlier revelation.

The Lack of Continuity and Confirmation

The question remains: if the Quran were truly the third installment of the inspired, inerrant Word of God, why does it not reflect continuity with the earlier two? When the New Testament emerged as Scripture, it confirmed and harmonized with the Old Testament. Jesus and the apostles repeatedly referred to the Hebrew Scriptures, quoting them and building upon their teachings. The two testaments form a complete and coherent whole, anchored in the same divine author. The transition from the Old Testament to the New did not uproot or deny what had come before. Instead, it fulfilled and clarified the earlier promises and prophecies.

If the Quran had truly come from the God of the Bible, it would likewise have shown a natural extension of the biblical message. It would have upheld the divine name Jehovah. It would have affirmed that sin entered the world through Adam and that humans need a savior. It would have confirmed that Jesus is the Son of God who died and rose again, fulfilling the prophecies of the earlier Scriptures. It would have preserved the central truths and not introduced radical departures. Instead, the Quran stands opposed to biblical teaching on numerous core doctrines, including the nature of Christ, the concept of original sin, and the method by which humans are saved.

The Quran introduces its own narrative of prophets and history that does not match the biblical record. It tries to present itself as confirming earlier Scriptures but ends up denying essential teachings at the heart of the biblical faith. This lack of confirmation and continuity proves that the Quran is not a genuine extension of God’s inspired Word.

The Claims of Restoration and Comparison

The Islamic narrative often suggests that Muhammad came as a restorer of the original faith of Abraham and the prophets. Yet, if that were true, the Quran would reflect the faith and practice found in the Bible, from Genesis onward. Instead, the Quran redefines key elements. It attempts to position itself as a final revelation that corrects supposed corruption in earlier texts. But the historical and textual evidence shows that the Bible’s text was preserved, that its doctrines remained intact, and that Jews and Christians faithfully transmitted their Scriptures.

Moreover, the New Testament, emerging in the first century C.E., did not contradict the Old Testament. Instead, it clarified and fulfilled it, always treating the earlier Scriptures with reverence and building on their foundation. The Quran, appearing about six hundred years after the completion of the New Testament, does not build upon that established foundation. Rather, it attempts to re-establish entirely different teachings and claims God’s favor without providing any evidence of continuity with the previous revelation.

The absence of fulfilled prophecy, the lack of doctrinal consistency, and the denial of essential biblical truths disqualify the Quran from being considered the next stage of God’s revelation. The Christian faith is rooted in a historical revelation supported by eyewitness testimony and fulfilled prophecy. The Bible stands alone in its unity, authority, and divine inspiration.

Conclusion: No Evidence That the Quran Is a Third Inspired Installment

The question that titles this article remains: Is there evidence that the Quran is the third installment of the inspired, inerrant Word of God? The weight of the evidence points to a clear and resolute answer: no. The Quran does not meet the necessary criteria. It does not confirm and harmonize with the existing biblical revelation. It does not uphold the crucial doctrines taught from Genesis through Revelation. It does not testify to the name Jehovah. It does not affirm the inherited sinfulness of mankind and the need for Christ’s atoning sacrifice. It does not acknowledge Jesus as the Son of God who rose from the dead. It does not provide external verification through verifiable miracles and fulfilled prophecies. It fails to maintain the unity and harmony that characterize the one true God’s previous revelations.

Instead, the Quran presents itself as a separate system of belief that contradicts what was revealed through Moses, the prophets, Jesus, and the apostles. The claims of textual corruption raised by Islamic scholars are nullified by the historical and textual evidence demonstrating the Bible’s faithful preservation. The Quran’s lack of continuity and its inconsistencies point not to divine inspiration but to human origin. Its theological divergences and doctrinal contradictions expose it as a product of human reasoning rather than a revelation from the true God who has already spoken through his prophets and his Son.

Christians who defend the truthfulness and authority of the Old and New Testaments do so based on the objective Historical-Grammatical method of interpretation and the wealth of manuscript evidence confirming Scripture’s fidelity. The results of careful scholarship have restored the Bible’s text to a faithful representation of the originals, removing any serious doubt about its reliability. There is no need to assume an Islamic correction to biblical teachings because the Bible’s doctrines are stable, consistent, and corroborated through the ages.

No attempts to claim the Quran as the final word from God can stand against the reality that it denies what God clearly revealed over many centuries through his prophets and through his Son, Jesus Christ. The harmony, continuity, and fulfilled prophecy found in the Bible are absent in the Quran. Thus, there is no evidence that the Quran is the third installment of the inspired, inerrant Word of God.

You May Also Benefit From

The Relationship Between the Bible and Islam

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).

Please Help Us Keep These Thousands of Blog Posts Free for All

$5.00