Please Help Us Keep These Thousands of Blog Posts Free for All
$5.00
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Apparent Contradiction
Genesis 4:5 in the King James Version reads:
“But unto Cain and to his offering he had not respect. And Cain was very wroth, and his countenance fell.” — Genesis 4:5, KJV
This appears, on the surface, to create a tension with several other Scriptures, including:
“For there is no respect of persons with God.” — Romans 2:11, KJV
“For Jehovah your God is God of gods, and Lord of lords, a great God, a mighty, and a terrible, which regardeth not persons, nor taketh reward.” — Deuteronomy 10:17, KJV
The difficulty arises in reconciling two ideas:
-
Genesis 4:5 seems to portray God as disapproving Cain and his offering.
-
Romans 2:11 and Deuteronomy 10:17 declare that God does not show partiality or favoritism.
Does God pick favorites? Does He arbitrarily reject some and accept others? How are we to understand the phrase “had not respect” in Genesis 4:5 in light of divine impartiality?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
I. Clarifying the Language: “Respect” and Its Meaning
The Hebrew word rendered “had not respect” in Genesis 4:5 is שָׁעָה (shaʿah). It does not mean “respect” in the modern sense of giving personal admiration or deference. Instead, it conveys the idea of looking with favor, accepting, or giving attention to.
In this context:
-
God looked with favor on Abel and his offering (Genesis 4:4),
-
but He did not look with favor on Cain and his offering (Genesis 4:5).
Modern literal translations clarify the meaning:
“And Jehovah had regard for Abel and his offering; but for Cain and his offering he had no regard.” — Genesis 4:4–5, UASV
This helps remove the anthropomorphic confusion introduced by the archaic KJV phrasing. The word “respect” here is about acceptance of worship, not personal favoritism.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
II. God Is Not Partial: Understanding Divine Impartiality
Passages like Deuteronomy 10:17 and Romans 2:11 deal with God’s impartiality in judgment and justice:
“God shows no partiality.” — Romans 2:11, ESV
“He executes justice for the fatherless and the widow, and loves the sojourner, giving him food and clothing.” — Deut. 10:18
These texts make clear that God does not judge based on social class, race, lineage, wealth, or status. He does not take bribes. He applies His standards consistently and fairly.
But impartiality does not mean God approves of all people equally regardless of their actions. Rather, He evaluates every person according to their deeds and their heart before Him.
This principle is reinforced by 1 Samuel 16:7:
“For man looks on the outward appearance, but Jehovah looks on the heart.”
Thus, Cain was not rejected arbitrarily. He was rejected because of his lack of faith, his wrong heart, and the inappropriate nature of his offering (Hebrews 11:4).
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
III. The Heart of Cain: Why Was His Offering Not Accepted?
Genesis 4:3–5 clearly contrasts Cain’s and Abel’s offerings. Abel brings the firstlings of the flock and their fat portions, reflecting sacrifice, value, and blood, consistent with atonement theology (cf. Leviticus 17:11). Cain merely brings some fruit of the ground—there is no indication of firstfruits, no blood, no faith.
Hebrews 11:4 explains the key difference:
“By faith Abel offered to God a more acceptable sacrifice than Cain…”
Cain’s lack of faith, and his later behavior (envy, murder, lying, and unrepentance), confirms that his heart was not right before God. Jehovah looked not merely at the offering, but at the person offering it (Genesis 4:4–5). It was both Cain and his offering that God did not regard favorably.
God addressed Cain directly, urging repentance:
“If you do well, will there not be a lifting up? And if you do not do well, sin is crouching at the door…” — Genesis 4:7
Cain was given the opportunity to do what was right. God’s impartiality is seen here—Cain was not rejected without recourse. His rejection was based on moral and spiritual condition, not favoritism.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
IV. Respect and Judgment: God’s Consistent Pattern
God’s favor is always tied to the condition of the heart and obedience to His will:
-
Genesis 6:8–9: “Noah found favor in the eyes of Jehovah… Noah walked with God.”
-
Exodus 33:17: God showed favor to Moses because he was known by God and walked in faith.
-
Malachi 1:2–3: “I have loved Jacob, but Esau I have hated.” This reflects God’s evaluation of their hearts and lives, not arbitrary favoritism. Esau despised his birthright (Genesis 25:34); Jacob pursued spiritual blessing.
-
Acts 10:34–35: “God shows no partiality, but in every nation anyone who fears him and does what is right is acceptable to him.”
God does not “respect persons” in terms of identity, appearance, or background, but He certainly evaluates and responds to the moral and spiritual quality of individuals. His favor is not mechanical or guaranteed—it is conditional upon faith, humility, and obedience.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
V. Conclusion: Yes, God Has Regard for Mankind—But Not for Willful Sin
To answer the central question: Does God have respect for mankind?
Yes, God respects His creation, as evidenced by:
-
Creating humans in His own image (Genesis 1:26–27),
-
Showing patience and mercy to sinners (2 Peter 3:9),
-
Sending His Son to die for the world (John 3:16).
But God does not regard mankind indiscriminately. His favor is given to those who approach Him in faith and obedience, as Abel did—not to those who do so in pride, self-reliance, or rebellion, as Cain did.
Genesis 4:5 is not a contradiction of divine impartiality. It is a demonstration of it. God rejected Cain not because of who he was, but because of what he did and how he did it. This aligns perfectly with Deuteronomy 10:17 and Romans 2:11.
In summary:
-
God has deep concern for humanity, evidenced by His creation, covenants, and redemptive plan.
-
God’s impartiality means He treats all people equitably, but not all people are approved—His approval is contingent on faith and obedience, not external identity or status.
-
Cain was rejected because his offering lacked faith and sincerity, not because of arbitrary favoritism.










































































































































































































































































































Reblogged this on Talmidimblogging.