Lachmann reset New Testament editing by privileging early, independent witnesses over the Textus Receptus, launching evidence-driven documentary textual criticism.
NTTC ROMANS 5:1: Is it “let us have peace with God” or “we have peace with God”?
“Let us have peace with God” is the reading in four of the earliest manuscripts (א* A B* C), as well as (D L 33 1739*) Marcion. “We have peace with God” is found in two earliest manuscripts, as well as (א1 B2 F G P Ψ 0220vid 1739). See the Final Thoughts at the end, as I would disagree with the majority consensus here.
THE P52 PROJECT: Is P52 Really the Earliest Greek New Testament Manuscript?
Discover the significance of P52: Could this be the oldest piece of the New Testament? Explore its origins and impact on faith.
What Is the Washington Codex of the Gospels AKA Codex Washingtonianus?
When we think of Majuscule codex manuscripts, immediately we think of Codex Vaticanus, Codex Sinaiticus, Codex, Alexandrinus, Codex Bezae, and Codex Ephraemi. Seldom does the Washington Codex of the Gospels come to our minds.
What Are Lacuna Manuscripts As It Relates to New Testament Textual Studies?
Lacuna (pl: Lacunae): an unfortunate loss of text within a manuscript due to accident or wear and tear. Even more unfortunate, lacunae usually are more frequent and more damaging in early manuscripts, especially the papyri. Notable Examples ...
NTTC 1 PETER 2:2: Was the Original Reading “you may grow into salvation” OR “you may grow”?
"The scribes of the Byzantine text were guilty of taking liberties with the text in both adding to and taking away from." Andrews "It was the corrupt Byzantine form of text that provided the basis for almost all translations of the New Testament into modern languages down to the nineteenth century." - Metzger
NTTC 2 PETER 1:10: Did Someone Take “by your good works” Out of Our Bible?
P72 B C K P 614 0209 1739 2492 Byz; Ambr has the original reading in 2 Peter 1:10, where we have Peter exhorting the brothers to “be all the more diligent to confirm your calling and choosing” (βεβαιαν υμων την κλησιν και εκλογην ποιεισθαι). A gloss, that is, a very short comment written by the scribe explaining
INTENTIONAL ERRORS: The necessity of Textual Criticism
A scribe is far more likely to omit a word or phrase mistakenly, as to intentionally adding. The reading that is deemed immediately at odds with the context is preferred if deemed intentional because a scribe is more likely to have smoothed the reading out. The harmonization of passages is likely an intentional change by a copyist, who is seeking to have a passage agree with a similar passage from another book. Examples: Doctrinal Corrections, Liturgical Corrections, Harmonistic Corrections, Historical Corrections, and Linguistic or Rhetorical Corrections.
NTTC MARK 1:2: Was the Original Reading “it has been written in Isaiah the prophet” OR “it has been written in the prophets”?
The quotation in verses 2 and 3 is composite, the first part being from Mal 3:1 and the second part from Is 40:3. It is easy to see, therefore, why copyists would have altered the words ...
UNINTENTIONAL ERRORS: The Necessity of Textual Criticism
Textual criticism delves into errors in textual evidence, aiming to preserve original words. With an abundance of evidence, conjectural emendation has little place. While only a small portion of text is questioned, unintentional and intentional errors lead to variant readings. These errors include those of the eye, pen, speech, mind, memory, and judgment.

