Book Description Edward D. Andrews boldly answers the challenges Bart D. Ehrman alleges against the fully inerrant, Spirit-inspired, authoritative Word of God. By glimpsing into
Tag: Misquoting Jesus
Is the New Testament Reliable? (Agnostic New Testament Bible Scholar Dr. Bart D. Ehrman)
THIS BLOG POST IS BASED ON THE OFTEN MADE CLAIM BY BART D. EHRMAN: “We don’t even have copies of the copies of the originals,
Discovering the Bart D. Ehrman Mindset
The last 30 plus years have seen a rise in interest in what are known as pseudo-gospels, epistles, and apocalypses discovered in the 1950s in
DEBUNKING AGNOSTIC BART D. EHRMAN: “And So It Goes for Centuries”
That is to say, once a scribe changes a text—whether accidentally or intentionally—then those changes are permanent in his manuscript (unless, of course, another scribe
DEBUNKING AGNOSTIC BART D. EHRMAN: ‘This was a Human Book from Beginning to End’
For me, though, this was a compelling problem. It was the words of Scripture themselves that God had inspired. Surely we have to know what
DEBUNKING AGNOSTIC BART D. EHRMAN: ‘We Don’t Have Copies of the Copies of the Copies of the Originals’
“Not only do we not have the originals, we don’t have the first copies of the originals. We don’t even have copies of the copies of the originals, or copies of the copies of the copies of the originals. What we have are copies made later—much later. In most instances, they are copies made many centuries later. And these copies all differ from one another, in many thousands of places.” – Agnostic NT textual scholar Dr. Bart D. Ehrman
