Explore an in-depth analysis of the reliability of Higher and Historical Criticism of the Bible. This article scrutinizes their methodologies, biases, and archaeological backing to offer a balanced view of their credibility. Ideal for those seeking an objective look at these influential but controversial scholarly approaches.
A Christian Skeptic Discovers God In Ancient Israel
William Foxwell Albright, the son of missionary parents, eagerly pursued his college education as a young man of faith. Finally, he received the coveted Ph.D.—but at a significant cost. His faith had been destroyed by the 19th-century German school of higher criticism. The leading exponents of this school of higher criticism, Julius Wellhausen and Franz Delitzsch, were out to prove that the Old Testament history of the Bible was mere fiction. Why?
Defending the Book of Jeremiah As Authentic and True
Engage in Defending the Book of Jeremiah as Authentic and True. Discover the evidence supporting its biblical validity.
Critical Objections to the Genuineness of the Bible Book of Ezekiel
Explore Critical Objections to the Genuineness of the Bible Book of Ezekiel. Discover the evidence behind Ezekiel's ancient prophecies. Is this book truly from the prophet?
BIBLICAL INTERPRETATION: There are Weaknesses with Redaction Criticism, But Are There Any Strengths?
Redaction critics tend to favor a view that biblical books were written much later and by different authors than the text relates. Late theological editors attached names out of history to their works for the sake of prestige and credibility. In Old and New Testament studies this view arose from historical criticism, source criticism, and form criticism. As a result, it adopts many of the same presuppositions, including the documentary hypothesis in the Old Testament and the priority of Mark in the New Testament. A redactor edits or changes a text composed by another. Redaction criticism of the Bible claims that subsequent editors (redactors) changed the text of Scripture. If such alleged changes were substantial, it would seriously damage the credibility of Scripture. We could not be sure what was in the original text.
The HOLY SCRIPTURES and Modern-Day Biblical Criticism
Analyze the Holy Scriptures within the lens of Modern-Day Biblical Criticism. Understand contemporary scriptural interpretation.
THEM DAMN GERMANS: The Decimation of the Word of God!
Discover how modern translations have altered the sacred text. Dive into the controversy surrounding German Bibles.
Could Christian Apologetics Deepen Our Trust in the Reliability of Scripture?
Explore how apologetics can affirm the Bible's truth. Discover arguments that enhance your faith in God's Word.
Why Do Churchgoers Need to Be Warned and Educated About the Dangers of Biblical Criticism?
Higher critics have taught that much of the Bible was composed of legend and myth, that Moses did not write the first five books of the Bible, 8th century Isaiah did not write Isaiah, there were three authors of Isaiah, 6th century Daniel did not write Daniel, it was penned in the 2nd century BCE. Higher critics have taught that Jesus did not say all that he said in his Sermon on the Mount and that Jesus did not condemn the Pharisees in Matthew 23, as this was Matthew because he hated the Jews. These are just highlights for there are
Since the 1990s How Has Lower (Textual) Criticism Begun Following in the Footsteps of Higher (Biblical) Criticism?
Discover how New Testament textual criticism has lost its way since the 1990s, as lower criticism has followed in the footsteps of higher criticism. Learn about the coherence-based genealogical method, which emphasizes the importance of understanding the historical and cultural context of the text and the social context of the manuscripts. Explore the changing definition and goal of New Testament textual criticism.

