Search

Christian Publishing House Blog

BIBLICAL TRAINING ACADEMY—Apologetic Defense of the faith, the Bible, and Christianity

Category

Agnostic Dr. Bart D. Ehrman

THE FACE OF AN APOSTATE ANTICHRIST

A Facebook person interested in New Testament Textual Criticism (NTTC) writes, "I was very reluctant [to buy Ehrman books] as I have tended to regard Ehrman as an anti-church type." We ask, 'That wouldn't be because he is an atheist... Continue Reading →

Advertisements

MISREPRESENTING JESUS: Debunking Bart D. Ehrman’s “Misquoting Jesus”

Book Description Edward D. Andrews boldly answers the challenges Bart D. Ehrman alleges against the fully inerrant, Spirit-inspired, authoritative Word of God. By glimpsing into the life of Bart D. Ehrman and following along his course of academic studies, Andrews... Continue Reading →

DEBUNKING AGNOSTIC BART D. EHRMAN: ‘What We Have Here Are the Error-Ridden Copies of the Autographs’

The Moody experience was intense. I decided to major in Bible theology, which meant taking a lot of biblical study and systematic theology courses. Only one perspective was taught in these courses, subscribed to by all the professors (they had... Continue Reading →

Is the New Testament Reliable? (Agnostic New Testament Bible Scholar—Bart D. Ehrman)

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored ninety-two books. Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American... Continue Reading →

Discovering the Bart D. Ehrman Mindset

The last 30 plus years have seen a rise in interest in what are known as pseudo-gospels, epistles, and apocalypses discovered in the 1950s in Nag Hammadi[1] and other places in Egypt. Generally, these documents and others have been referred... Continue Reading →

DEBUNKING AGNOSTIC BART D. EHRMAN: “And So It Goes for Centuries”

That is to say, once a scribe changes a text—whether accidentally or intentionally—then those changes are permanent in his manuscript (unless, of course, another scribe comes along to correct the mistake). The next scribe who copies that manuscript copies those... Continue Reading →

DEBUNKING AGNOSTIC BART D. EHRMAN: ‘This was a Human Book from Beginning to End’

For me, though, this was a compelling problem. It was the words of Scripture themselves that God had inspired. Surely we have to know what those words were if we want to know how he had communicated to us, since... Continue Reading →

DEBUNKING AGNOSTIC BART D. EHRMAN: ‘We Don’t Have Copies of the Copies of the Copies of the Originals’

Not only do we not have the originals, we don’t have the first copies of the originals. We don’t even have copies of the copies of the originals, or copies of the copies of the copies of the originals. What... Continue Reading →

Agnostic Ehrman Equates the Apocryphal Gospels as Being Equal to the Canonical Gospels—Debunking Bart D. Ehrman

"To be sure, of all the hundreds of thousands of textual changes found among our manuscripts, most of them are completely insignificant, immaterial, of no real importance for anything other than showing that scribes could not spell or keep focused... Continue Reading →

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑