
Please Help Us Keep These Thousands of Blog Posts Growing and Free for All
$5.00
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Origin of the Conflict Narrative
The so-called conflict myth—the claim that science and the Bible are inherently opposed—did not arise from Scripture itself but from philosophical naturalism. Naturalism begins with the assumption that only material causes exist and that God is either unnecessary or nonexistent. When that presupposition governs scientific interpretation, the conclusion is predetermined. Yet Scripture does not oppose empirical investigation. On the contrary, the Bible presents the created order as intelligible, structured, and governed by laws because it originates from a rational Creator.
Genesis 1:1 declares, “In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.” This foundational statement establishes that matter, energy, time, and space had a beginning. Science, particularly since the twentieth century, has confirmed that the universe is not eternal but had a definite beginning. The biblical worldview anticipated this reality thousands of years before modern cosmology. The problem, therefore, is not science but philosophical interpretations that exclude Jehovah from consideration.
Psalm 19:1–2 states, “The heavens declare the glory of God, and the sky above proclaims his handiwork. Day to day pours out speech, and night to night reveals knowledge.” The psalmist affirms that the created order communicates knowledge. This aligns with the very purpose of scientific inquiry, which is to observe, measure, and understand the natural world. True science seeks to discover how creation operates; Scripture reveals why it exists and Who brought it into being. There is no contradiction between understanding mechanisms and affirming divine causation.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Biblical Foundation for Scientific Inquiry
The historical-grammatical reading of Scripture shows that the Bible portrays the universe as orderly and governed by consistent laws. Jeremiah 33:25 records Jehovah’s words: “If I have not established my covenant with day and night and the fixed order of heaven and earth.” The phrase “fixed order” reflects stability and predictability. Scientific methodology depends upon the assumption that natural processes are consistent. Without such stability, experimentation and repeatability would be impossible.
Proverbs 25:2 teaches, “It is the glory of God to conceal things, but the glory of kings is to search things out.” Jehovah structured creation with discoverable patterns. Humans, made in His image (Genesis 1:26–27), possess rational capacities enabling them to investigate and understand those patterns. The ability to reason mathematically, to formulate hypotheses, and to draw logical conclusions reflects that mankind was designed with intellectual faculties suited to comprehend a rational universe.
Romans 1:20 further affirms, “For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have
been made. So they are without excuse.” Paul does not argue that creation merely suggests the possibility of God; he states that God’s eternal power and divine nature are clearly perceived through what has been made. The Greek term kathoratai carries the sense of being distinctly seen or understood. Creation, therefore, is not religiously neutral. It testifies to its Creator. Science, when honestly conducted, examines that very testimony. The issue is not whether creation speaks but whether the interpreter is willing to acknowledge what it reveals.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Six Creative Days and Scientific Order
Genesis 1 describes six creative “days,” which, according to the historical-grammatical method, are structured periods of time rather than 24-hour intervals. The Hebrew term yom can denote an extended period, as seen in Genesis 2:4, where “the day” summarizes the entire creative work. The sequence presented in Genesis 1 reveals increasing complexity and organization: the establishment of light, the separation of waters, the emergence of dry land, plant life, luminaries, marine and avian creatures, land animals, and finally mankind.
The text does not present mythological chaos or rival deities battling for supremacy. Instead, Jehovah speaks, and reality responds. “And God said… and it was so” appears repeatedly, emphasizing sovereign authority and intentional design. This orderly progression aligns with the scientific observation that complexity arises within structured systems governed by physical laws. Hebrews 11:3 states, “By faith we understand that the universe was created by the word of God, so that what is seen was not made out of things that are visible.” This passage affirms that the material universe did not arise from preexisting visible matter. Modern physics recognizes that matter and energy originated from an initial cosmic beginning, consistent with the biblical declaration.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Humanity as Rational Investigators
Genesis 1:28 records that God commanded mankind to “fill the earth and subdue it, and have dominion.” Dominion implies responsible stewardship, not exploitation. To subdue the earth requires understanding its properties, resources, and patterns. Scientific study is therefore a fulfillment of mankind’s original mandate. Far from opposing science, Scripture authorizes it within moral boundaries.
Psalm 8:3–6 reflects awe at the heavens while acknowledging man’s assigned role: “You have given him dominion over the works of your hands.” The psalmist does not view astronomical vastness as negating human significance. Instead, he recognizes that Jehovah has entrusted humanity with meaningful responsibility. This worldview laid the groundwork historically for systematic science, because the universe was seen as lawful rather than capricious.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Distinction Between Science and Scientism
Science is the disciplined study of the natural world through observation and experimentation. Scientism, however, is the philosophical claim that science is the only valid path to knowledge. The Bible never conflicts with empirical data properly interpreted, but it does confront philosophical overreach. Colossians 2:8 warns, “See to it that no one takes you captive by philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition… and not according to Christ.”
When naturalistic assumptions are inserted into scientific conclusions, those conclusions move beyond data into metaphysical claims. For example, the assertion that life arose from non-life through unguided processes is not a direct observation but an interpretation shaped by prior commitments. Genesis 1:21 states that God created living creatures according to their kinds. The phrase “according to their kinds” indicates biological boundaries. While variation occurs within kinds, Scripture does not teach universal common ancestry. The empirical study of genetics reveals remarkable complexity in DNA, reinforcing the reality of specified information. Information is not a property that arises spontaneously from disorder; it reflects intelligence.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Age of the Earth and Biblical Chronology
Scripture provides a coherent chronological framework from creation onward. While Genesis does not assign a specific date to creation itself, it presents genealogies and historical markers that anchor events such as the Flood in 2348 B.C.E. (Genesis 7–8). The Flood narrative is presented as global in scope, affecting “all the high mountains under the whole heaven” (Genesis 7:19). The language is comprehensive, and the historical-grammatical reading does not allow reduction to a merely local event.
Geological formations, sedimentary layers, and fossil deposits are consistent with rapid, large-scale catastrophic processes. The biblical account explains the presence of extensive fossilization through a watery judgment that reshaped the earth’s surface. 2 Peter 3:5–6 states that “the earth was formed out of water and through water… and that by means of these the world that then existed was deluged with water and perished.” Peter treats the Flood as historical fact and as a precedent for future judgment. The Apostle does not allegorize the event; he affirms its reality.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Miracles and Natural Law
Critics often claim that miracles violate natural laws and therefore cannot occur. This objection misunderstands both biblical miracles and natural law. Natural laws describe regular patterns within creation. They are descriptive, not prescriptive. Jehovah, as Creator, is not bound by the processes He established. When Jesus turned water into wine (John 2:1–11) or calmed the sea (Mark 4:39), He did not break laws in a chaotic sense; He exercised authority over His creation.
Miracles in Scripture are not random spectacles but purposeful signs authenticating divine revelation. John 20:30–31 explains that the signs performed by Jesus were written “so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God.” The resurrection of Jesus on Nisan 14, 33 C.E., stands as the central miracle of the Christian faith. 1 Corinthians 15:3–4 affirms that Christ died for our sins, was buried, and was raised on the third day. The resurrection was not a symbolic event but a historical occurrence witnessed by many (1 Corinthians 15:5–8). If God created life originally, restoring life is not beyond His power.
The Moral Dimension of Knowledge
Science can describe what is, but it cannot determine what ought to be. Moral truths transcend empirical measurement. Scripture reveals that Jehovah is the standard of righteousness. Ecclesiastes 12:13 declares, “Fear God and keep his commandments, for this is the whole duty of man.” Knowledge divorced from moral accountability leads to corruption. The technological advancements of modern science demonstrate human ingenuity, yet without biblical guidance they can be used destructively.
Romans 1:21–22 explains that although people knew God, “they became futile in their thinking.” Intellectual brilliance does not guarantee spiritual discernment. The rejection of the Creator leads to distorted reasoning. The conflict myth arises not from scientific discovery but from spiritual resistance to acknowledging Jehovah as Creator.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Christ as the Sustainer of Creation
Colossians 1:16–17 states of Christ, “For by him all things were created… and in him all things hold together.” The Son is not merely a historical teacher but the agent through whom creation was brought into existence and is sustained. The coherence of the universe—its finely tuned constants and interdependent systems—reflects ongoing governance. Hebrews 1:3 affirms that He “upholds the universe by the word of his power.” Scientific investigation of physical constants reveals precise calibration necessary for life. Such precision is consistent with deliberate design.
![]() |
![]() |
True Science as an Ally of Faith
Properly defined, science seeks truth about the physical world. Christianity seeks truth about God, humanity, sin, and redemption. Because Jehovah is the Author of both Scripture and creation, truth cannot contradict truth. When apparent conflicts arise, either scientific interpretation is incomplete or biblical interpretation has been mishandled. The historical-grammatical method safeguards against imposing foreign ideas onto the text. At the same time, humility in scientific inquiry acknowledges that human understanding is limited.
Isaiah 40:26 calls us to “Lift up your eyes on high and see: who created these?” The prophet directs attention to the stars as evidence of divine power. Far from fearing astronomical discovery, Scripture invites examination. Each new discovery in physics, biology, or astronomy uncovers further intricacy and order. Rather than eroding belief, such discoveries deepen appreciation for the wisdom of Jehovah.
The conflict myth persists because it rests on an artificial division between faith and reason. Scripture presents no such division. Faith is not blind acceptance but trust grounded in evidence. Hebrews 11:1 describes faith as “the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen.” Conviction arises from substantiated reality, not wishful thinking. Creation itself supplies ongoing evidence of the Creator’s power and intelligence.
When science operates within its proper boundaries—studying the mechanisms of the natural world—it harmonizes with Scripture. When it steps into philosophical assertions denying God, it exceeds its mandate. The Christian need not fear genuine scientific discovery. Every law uncovered, every galaxy observed, and every cell examined ultimately reflects the ordered mind of Jehovah. True science aligns with the Creator because He is the Source of all reality.
![]() |
![]() |
You May Also Enjoy
What Is the Doctrine of Continuous Creation, and Is God Continually Creating?






























Leave a Reply