The World That Formed Him

Thomas Aquinas was a thirteenth-century Dominican friar, theologian, and teacher who became one of the most influential intellectual figures of medieval Western Christianity. He lived in a world where universities were emerging as centers of formal learning, where Aristotle’s writings were being reintroduced to the Latin West through translation, and where the church’s scholars were wrestling with how reason, philosophy, and Scripture relate to one another. Aquinas did not approach theology as a detached exercise. He worked as a pastor-teacher within the life of the church, aiming to clarify doctrine, defend the faith, and train minds to think carefully about God, creation, morality, and human destiny. Understanding him requires seeing both his spiritual vocation and his academic setting: he was a man convinced that truth is coherent, that God is not contradicted by reality, and that the created order—rightly interpreted—cannot ultimately overturn what God has revealed in Scripture.

Aquinas was born into a noble family in Italy, and as a young man he studied in contexts shaped by monastic and scholastic learning. Against his family’s expectations, he entered the Dominican Order, a mendicant community devoted to preaching and teaching. His career included extended periods of study, lecturing, writing, and disputation—structured debates common in medieval universities. He worked within a system that prized careful definitions, logical argumentation, and the orderly treatment of questions. This method did not replace Scripture in his mind; it attempted to organize theological claims and defend them from objections. Even so, from a conservative evangelical standpoint, it is important to distinguish between theology that is governed by the plain meaning of Scripture and theology that sometimes allows philosophical categories to steer interpretation. Aquinas is a pivotal figure precisely because he represents an ambitious and sophisticated attempt to integrate Christian doctrine with a robust philosophical framework.

His Central Writings And Why They Matter

Aquinas wrote many works, but he is especially known for two large syntheses: the Summa Theologiae and the Summa Contra Gentiles. The Summa Theologiae is structured as a teaching tool, moving through God, creation, humanity, ethics, and Christ. Each topic is presented through questions, objections, a stated response, and replies. The form itself reveals his aim: to show that Christian doctrine can be explained with clarity, answered against misunderstandings, and applied to moral life. The Summa Contra Gentiles is often described as apologetic in character, addressing what can be known by reason about God and responding to non-Christian objections, while also defending distinctly Christian claims that depend on revelation.

Why does Aquinas still matter? Because he shaped how many later thinkers—especially within Roman Catholic theology—spoke about natural theology, moral reasoning, law, and metaphysics. He also influenced discussions that reach into modern debates: whether God’s existence can be argued from the created order, how to speak about God’s attributes without collapsing Him into creaturely categories, how to define virtues, and how reason and revelation should relate. Even those who disagree with him often do so in conversation with his categories. In that sense, Aquinas is a landmark figure: he did not merely repeat earlier teaching; he systematized, refined, and argued with a level of rigor that set a template for centuries of theological instruction.

His Use Of Philosophy And The Question Of Authority

Aquinas made extensive use of Aristotle’s philosophy, especially Aristotle’s logic and metaphysics. He believed that careful reasoning about causation, motion, contingency, and purpose could support truths consistent with biblical theism. He argued, for example, that the existence of an ordered, dependent world points to a first cause and a necessary being. From an apologetic angle, it is fair to say that Aquinas tried to show that belief in God is not irrational and that the world is intelligible in a way that fits the doctrine of creation. Scripture itself teaches that the created order bears witness to God’s power and divine nature, so that people are accountable (Romans 1:18–20). That biblical foundation is real. The crucial issue is how far human reason can be pressed, and whether philosophical concepts are allowed to become controlling authorities alongside Scripture.

Conservative evangelical interpretation insists that Scripture is the final authority, and that human reasoning is valuable but limited, affected by sin, and always subordinate to God’s Word. The biblical pattern is not anti-intellectual; it calls believers to love God with the mind (Matthew 22:37), to reason from the Scriptures (Acts 17:2), and to be ready to defend the faith with gentleness and respect (1 Peter 3:15). Yet it also warns against being taken captive by philosophical systems that can displace Christ-centered truth (Colossians 2:8). Aquinas’s project sits near that boundary. He sought harmony between faith and reason, and he frequently affirmed the primacy of revelation for truths that reason cannot reach. Still, his method sometimes encouraged later readers to treat philosophical frameworks as if they were neutral, universally reliable pathways to theological certainty. Biblical apologetics values rational clarity, but it refuses the idea that autonomous human reason can stand as judge over revelation.

What He Taught About God And Creation

Aquinas strongly affirmed classical theism: God as the uncreated Creator, distinct from the world, the source of being, and the sustaining cause of all that exists. He emphasized God’s simplicity and immutability, aiming to protect the doctrine that God is not composed of parts and is not subject to change as creatures are. Conservative evangelicals can appreciate the impulse to guard God’s uniqueness. Scripture indeed distinguishes the Creator from the creation (Isaiah 40:25–26) and insists that God is faithful and unchanging in His character (James 1:17). The challenge is ensuring that philosophical descriptions never flatten the vivid biblical portrait of Jehovah as personal, speaking, loving, judging, showing mercy, and acting in history. The Bible’s language about God is not the language of abstraction; it is covenantal and relational, filled with God’s words and deeds, and anchored in His self-revelation.

On creation, Aquinas affirmed that the world is created by God and depends upon Him. Scripture is clear that all things came into existence through God’s creative will (Genesis 1:1; Revelation 4:11). Aquinas’s framework often spoke in terms of primary and secondary causes, seeking to explain how God’s sovereignty relates to creaturely action. Here again, biblical teaching requires careful balance: Jehovah is the Creator and Sustainer, yet humans are responsible moral agents who answer for their choices (Deuteronomy 30:19; Romans 14:12). The Bible does not treat human responsibility as an illusion. A sound apologetic approach keeps both truths in view without letting a philosophical system erase the plain sense of Scripture’s moral accountability.

His Moral Theology And The Idea Of Natural Law

One of Aquinas’s most enduring contributions is his discussion of ethics, virtues, and law. He argued that there is a moral order in creation that human beings can, to some extent, perceive. This is often called natural law. Scripture teaches that Gentiles who do not have the Mosaic Law still show the work of the law written on their hearts, with conscience bearing witness (Romans 2:14–15). That text establishes that moral awareness is not limited to those who possess Scripture; human conscience reflects creational design and moral accountability. In that limited sense, Aquinas’s emphasis that morality is not arbitrary and that creation has order fits biblical teaching.

Yet conservative evangelical theology insists that conscience is not an infallible guide, because humans suppress truth in unrighteousness (Romans 1:18) and hearts can be misdirected. Therefore, moral reasoning must be corrected and governed by Scripture. Aquinas’s virtue ethics can be valuable in describing habits of character, but it must not be detached from the biblical gospel, the need for repentance, and the authority of God’s commands. Scripture does not present morality merely as human flourishing according to nature; it presents morality as faithfulness to Jehovah’s will, grounded in His holiness and expressed in obedience (1 Peter 1:14–16). Christian ethics, biblically framed, is not simply training virtues; it is living as disciples of Christ under the authority of God’s Word.

Where Evangelicals Often Differ From Aquinas

Aquinas was a committed Roman Catholic theologian, and he affirmed teachings bound to medieval Catholic doctrine, including sacramental structures and ecclesial authority claims that conservative evangelicals reject. Without turning this into polemics, a careful evangelical reader recognizes that Aquinas’s approach often assumes a church tradition framework that stands alongside Scripture as an authoritative interpretive guide. By contrast, evangelical apologetics insists on the supreme authority of Scripture as God-breathed and fully sufficient for teaching, reproof, correction, and training in righteousness (2 Timothy 3:16–17). That conviction shapes how doctrine is built and how disputes are settled. Where Aquinas’s conclusions rest on ecclesial dogma not grounded in the clear teaching of Scripture, the evangelical must decline the conclusion even while respecting Aquinas’s intellectual discipline.

There are also differences in anthropology and eschatology. Conservative evangelical biblical anthropology rejects the idea of an immortal soul as a natural possession. Scripture presents man as a soul, a living person, not a body plus an indestructible immaterial entity that cannot die (Genesis 2:7). Death is portrayed as cessation of personhood, a state of unconsciousness, with hope anchored in resurrection (Ecclesiastes 9:5, 10; John 5:28–29; Acts 24:15). Medieval scholastic theology commonly used philosophical categories that supported a more dualistic view, and later traditions often strengthened that direction. Aquinas’s philosophical commitments affected how he spoke about the human person. A biblically governed apologetic insists that doctrine about human nature and the afterlife must arise from Scripture’s teaching about death, Sheol/Hades as gravedom, and resurrection as God’s re-creation of the person.

How To Read Aquinas Profitably Without Being Captured By His System

Aquinas can be read profitably if he is read with Scripture as the final measure. His careful definitions, his awareness of objections, and his insistence that theology should be intelligible can sharpen a believer’s thinking. Scripture itself demonstrates reasoned argument, structured teaching, and careful refutation of error, and it calls Christians to handle the Word accurately (2 Timothy 2:15). Aquinas’s disciplined method can serve that goal when kept subordinate to the text of Scripture. His work can also remind believers that Christianity addresses the whole person, including the mind, and that God is not honored by careless reasoning or superficial claims.

At the same time, Aquinas should not be treated as a second authority that quietly governs interpretation. The Bible is not a set of raw data waiting for a philosophical system to organize it. Scripture is God’s speech, given in human language, meant to be read according to its historical-grammatical sense. When philosophical terms reshape the meaning of biblical words, the interpreter is no longer listening to Scripture but to a framework imposed upon it. The apologetic task is to defend the faith once delivered, grounded in the prophets and apostles, centered on Christ, and proclaimed with clarity. Aquinas’s legacy is therefore both instructive and cautionary: he models intellectual seriousness, but he also demonstrates how easily theology can be steered by non-biblical categories if vigilance is not maintained.

You May Also Enjoy

What Is Joel’s Army According to Scripture?

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS