Why Did Moses Command the Israelites to Spare the Midianite Virgins Keeping Them Alive for Themselves in Numbers 31:18?

Please Help Us Keep These Thousands of Blog Posts Growing and Free for All

$5.00

The account recorded in Numbers 31 has long been a focal point for critics of Scripture, who charge that Moses sanctioned cruelty or immorality when he instructed the Israelite warriors, “But all the young girls who have not known man by lying with him keep alive for yourselves” (Numbers 31:18). A proper understanding of this passage requires that we apply the Historical-Grammatical method, carefully considering the context, covenantal setting, language, and the moral character of Jehovah as revealed consistently throughout the Scriptures.

The Historical Context of the Midianite Judgment

Numbers 31 describes a divinely commanded judgment against Midian. This event occurred near the end of Israel’s wilderness wandering, shortly before their entrance into the Promised Land in 1406 B.C.E. The Midianites were not innocent bystanders. In Numbers 25, they had actively conspired with Moab to seduce Israel into idolatry and sexual immorality. Balaam advised Balak to entice Israel into sin through the women of Midian, leading to Israel’s participation in the worship of Baal of Peor (Numbers 31:16). As a result, 24,000 Israelites died because of their unfaithfulness to Jehovah (Numbers 25:9).

The judgment recorded in Numbers 31 was therefore not an act of random aggression but a measured response to deliberate spiritual corruption. Midian had sought to destroy Israel spiritually, thereby threatening the covenant line through which the Messiah would come (Genesis 12:3; 22:18). The attack on Midian was a theocratic act of divine justice administered through Israel.

The Meaning of “Keep Alive for Yourselves”

The phrase “keep alive for yourselves” must be understood within the legal and cultural framework of ancient Israel, not through the lens of modern assumptions. The Hebrew expression does not imply immediate sexual exploitation. In fact, the Mosaic Law strictly regulated the treatment of female captives. Deuteronomy 21:10–14 provides specific instructions regarding women taken in warfare. An Israelite man who desired to marry a captive woman was required to bring her into his household, allow her a month to mourn her parents, and then marry her formally. She was to be treated as a wife, not as property. If he later found no delight in her, he was required to let her go free and was forbidden from selling or mistreating her.

Thus, “keep alive for yourselves” must be interpreted in harmony with these regulations. The young girls spared were not to be abused but integrated into Israelite society under covenantal law. They would be raised within a community governed by Jehovah’s moral standards. In time, some would become wives through lawful marriage, and others servants within Israelite households, protected by Israelite law.

It is significant that only the virgins were spared. The women who had participated in seducing Israel into idolatry were executed because of their active role in leading Israel into covenant violation (Numbers 31:15–17). The virgins, by contrast, had not been participants in that rebellion. Sparing them distinguished between the guilty and the innocent within the context of that generation’s collective corruption.

Divine Justice and the Elimination of Corrupting Influence

The destruction of Midian’s adult population must be viewed in light of Israel’s unique role as a holy nation (Exodus 19:5–6). Jehovah had set Israel apart for a redemptive purpose culminating in the coming of Jesus Christ in 33 C.E. on Nisan 14. Persistent idolatry and immorality threatened that redemptive line. The Canaanite and related cultures practiced ritual prostitution, child sacrifice, and pervasive moral corruption (Deuteronomy 12:31). Midian had aligned itself with those corrupting influences.

The sparing of the virgins demonstrates discrimination in judgment rather than indiscriminate slaughter. It reflects the principle later expressed in Deuteronomy 24:16, that individuals bear responsibility for their own sin. Those who had not participated in the seduction of Israel were not executed.

The charge that this passage promotes immorality collapses when examined in the full light of Mosaic legislation. Sexual relations outside of marriage were prohibited (Exodus 20:14; Deuteronomy 22:13–29). Any Israelite who violated these standards faced severe consequences. The assumption that the text condones exploitation imports foreign ideas into the passage.

The Theocratic Nature of Israel’s Warfare

Israel’s wars during the Conquest period were not imperial campaigns. They were limited, divinely directed judgments against specific peoples at a specific time in redemptive history. The command concerning Midian was not a general rule for all nations or for later generations. After Christ’s execution in 33 C.E., the people of God no longer function as a theocratic nation wielding civil authority. Christians wage spiritual warfare, not physical conquest (2 Corinthians 10:3–5).

Numbers 31 belongs to a unique covenant administration under the Mosaic Law. It cannot be abstracted from that setting. Jehovah, as Creator and Judge, has authority over life and death (Deuteronomy 32:39). His judgments are never arbitrary, even when they are severe.

The Protection and Assimilation of the Spared Girls

The spared young girls entered a covenant community with defined moral boundaries. They would abandon Midianite idolatry and be raised among a people who worshiped Jehovah alone. If they became wives, they would do so under legal protections that exceeded those common in surrounding cultures.

Far from endorsing exploitation, the text reveals restraint. In ancient Near Eastern warfare, total annihilation without distinction was common. Israel’s conduct, regulated by divine law, distinguished between those guilty of deliberate corruption and those who were not.

A careful exegesis demonstrates that Numbers 31:18 does not portray moral evil but a historical act of divine judgment coupled with measured mercy. The passage must be read in its covenantal, legal, and redemptive context.

You May Also Enjoy

What Does the Bible Teach About Hope?

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑

Discover more from Christian Publishing House Blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading