The Galatians Setting: A Gospel Threatened by Legalism

Paul’s statement, “through the law I died to the law,” belongs to a real historical conflict in the first-century congregations of Galatia. Certain men were pressing the view that Gentile believers must take on the Mosaic Law as an identity marker of God’s people, particularly circumcision and the broader obligations tied to the Sinai covenant. Paul treats that message as a direct corruption of the good news, because it shifts the basis of being declared righteous from faith in Christ to performance under the Law. Galatians 2 does not present a mild disagreement about preferences; it presents a conflict about how a sinner can stand approved before Jehovah.

The immediate context includes the confrontation at Antioch (Galatians 2:11-14). Peter had been eating with Gentile believers, but when men associated with a circumcision party arrived, he drew back. Paul rebuked him publicly because the behavior implied that Gentile believers were second-class unless they adopted Jewish boundary markers. The heart of Paul’s argument follows: “a man is not declared righteous by works of law but through faith in Jesus Christ.” (Compare Galatians 2:16.) That truth frames the meaning of “through the law I died to the law.”

What “Law” Means Here: The Mosaic Covenant as a Legal System

In Galatians 2:19, “law” refers to the Mosaic Law covenant given through Moses to Israel. Paul is not attacking Jehovah’s moral standards, nor is he claiming that God’s revelation was flawed. The Law was holy and served Jehovah’s purposes. Yet the Law functioned as a covenant administration with specific terms, penalties, and boundary markers. It demanded perfect obedience and pronounced a curse on the covenant-breaker. Because humans are sinners, the Law’s legal structure inevitably exposes guilt and brings condemnation.

Paul’s language is carefully chosen. He does not say, “I improved under the law,” or “I reformed myself through the law.” He says, “I died.” Death is not a minor adjustment; death is a definitive end of jurisdiction. When someone has died, the legal code no longer has authority to prosecute him, because the sentence has been executed. Paul is describing a change in covenantal standing and legal status, not merely a change in religious mood.

“Through the Law”: How the Law Itself Led to Death

The phrase “through the law” explains the instrument by which Paul died to the law. The Law itself, by its true function, brought him to the point of death. How?

First, the Law reveals Jehovah’s righteous standard in concrete commands. When that standard confronts a sinner, it exposes transgression as transgression. The Law does not flatter; it diagnoses. It makes sin “exceedingly sinful” by defining it and assigning guilt to it. Paul elsewhere describes this principle: sin seizes opportunity through the commandment to expose what is already in the fallen human heart. The Law, therefore, does not cure the disease of sin; it identifies it and pronounces judgment.

Second, the Law carries a penalty structure. It blesses the one who does all that is written in it, and it curses the one who does not. That legal feature is not an accident. The Law functions like a covenant lawsuit: it declares what righteousness looks like, then it testifies against the lawbreaker. In that sense, the Law is an instrument that leads the sinner to the verdict of death. The Law’s righteous demands do not bend to human weakness. If a person places himself under the Law as a means of being declared righteous, he places himself under the Law’s curse the moment he fails.

Third, and most decisive in Paul’s argument, the Law pointed forward to Christ’s redemptive work, which includes bearing the covenant curse that the Law pronounces. Paul later writes, “Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us.” (Galatians 3:13.) That statement reveals the logic already present in Galatians 2:19. The Law pronounces curse and death on the breaker. Christ, though sinless, accepted the judicial burden of that curse as the ransom sacrifice. When a believer is united to Christ by faith, the believer’s relationship to the Law as a condemning covenant administration ends because the Law’s penalty has been executed in Christ’s death.

Thus, “through the law” includes the Law’s condemning verdict and the Law’s forward-pointing function that drives the sinner to Christ, the only One who can remove condemnation.

“I Died to the Law”: Death as a Change of Legal Realm

Paul’s expression “I died to the law” must be read with his next words: “so that I might live to God.” The purpose is not lawlessness. The purpose is a new way of life under Jehovah that is not grounded in the Mosaic covenant as the means of righteousness.

To “die to the law” means the Law no longer holds covenant jurisdiction over Paul as the system that defines his standing with Jehovah. Paul is not saying that Jehovah stopped caring about righteousness. He is saying the Sinai covenant is no longer the governing covenant arrangement for those in Christ.

This is why Paul immediately continues, “I have been crucified with Christ.” (Galatians 2:20.) Paul’s “death” is not merely an inner feeling; it is participation in Christ’s death in a covenantal and judicial sense. Christ’s death is counted as the believer’s death. The condemning claim of the Law is satisfied, not by the believer’s performance, but by Christ’s ransom sacrifice. The Law’s jurisdiction ends where death has occurred.

Paul then explains the present reality: “it is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me.” (Galatians 2:20.) He is not teaching an indwelling of the Holy Spirit or mystical possession. He is describing a Christ-centered identity and direction: the believer’s life is now defined by union with Christ and loyalty to Him, expressed through faith and obedience to the Spirit-inspired Scriptures. Paul lives “by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me.” The new life is anchored in Christ’s self-giving love and ransom, not in a legal code that condemns the sinner.

Why Paul Could Not Return to the Law Without Denying the Gospel

Paul’s statement carries a warning. If righteousness could be gained through law, then Christ died for nothing. (Galatians 2:21.) The cross would become unnecessary. That is why Paul refuses to treat the Judaizers’ message as a harmless preference.

If Paul rebuilt what he tore down, he would prove himself a transgressor. (Galatians 2:18.) What did he tear down? He tore down the belief that the Mosaic Law is the pathway to being declared righteous before Jehovah. If he returned to that system as a means of righteousness, he would deny the sufficiency of Christ’s ransom and place himself again under a covenant that condemns him. The Law, rightly understood, would again testify against him and pronounce the verdict he already knows: he falls short.

In other words, dying to the Law is not contempt for Jehovah’s Word; it is submission to Jehovah’s own redemptive plan. The Law’s role was never to make sinners righteous by their own performance. It was to define righteousness, expose sin, and prepare the way for the Messiah’s saving work.

Living to God: Not Under Sinai, Yet Not Without Divine Standards

When Paul says he died to the Law “so that I might live to God,” he defines the ethical direction that flows from justification. Justification is not permission to practice sin. It is the judicial declaration that the believer stands approved on the basis of Christ’s ransom, leading to a transformed life of obedience.

The believer’s guidance comes through the Spirit-inspired Word of God, with Christ’s teaching and the apostolic writings shaping conscience and conduct. The moral will of Jehovah does not vanish when the Mosaic covenant ends. Adultery remains sin, theft remains sin, idolatry remains sin, and hatred remains sin. These are not arbitrary rules; they express Jehovah’s holy character and His purpose for human life.

At the same time, Paul refuses to put Christians under the Sinai covenant’s boundary markers and ceremonial obligations as a requirement for standing approved. Circumcision, food laws, and calendar observances do not define membership in the people of God in the new covenant arrangement. Faith in Christ, repentance, baptism by immersion, and a life of obedient discipleship define those who belong to Him.

This balance is essential: Paul’s gospel is not antinomian, and it is not legalistic. It is Christ-centered obedience rooted in grace and truth. Salvation is not a static condition that can never be lost regardless of conduct; it is a path of faithful endurance, where genuine faith expresses itself through obedience. Yet that obedience never becomes the basis on which Jehovah declares a sinner righteous. The basis remains the ransom sacrifice of Christ.

The Law’s Continuing Value Without Its Condemning Jurisdiction

Paul’s “death to the law” does not make the Hebrew Scriptures irrelevant. The Law remains part of inspired Scripture and continues to teach. It reveals Jehovah’s holiness, His hatred of sin, His justice, His mercy, and His patience with a stubborn people. It contains historical revelation that anchors the Messiah’s lineage and mission. It also provides patterns of wisdom about worship, community life, and the seriousness of bloodguilt and idolatry.

But it must be used lawfully, meaning in harmony with its intended purpose. Under the new covenant arrangement, the Mosaic Law is not the covenant authority that governs the believer’s standing with Jehovah. The believer learns from it as Scripture, but lives under the authority of Christ, whose sacrifice has fulfilled the Law’s condemning demands and whose teachings define the life of discipleship.

So when Paul says, “through the law I died to the law,” he is declaring that the Law itself—by exposing sin, condemning transgression, and pointing to the Messiah who bears the curse—brought him to the end of the Law as the means of righteousness, so that he could belong to Christ and live to Jehovah in faithful obedience.

You May Also Enjoy

In What Sense Is “The Way of a Man With a Young Woman” Beyond Comprehension? (Proverbs 30:18-19)

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS