
Please Help Us Keep These Thousands of Blog Posts Growing and Free for All
$5.00
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The concept of praying in tongues, as discussed in various Scriptures, requires a careful examination rooted in the conservative evangelical understanding of the Bible as the inspired, inerrant, and infallible Word of God. We hold that the miraculous gift of speaking in tongues, which involved uttering intelligible foreign languages unknown to the speaker, was a temporary provision from Jehovah God to authenticate the early Christian congregation and facilitate the rapid spread of the good news. This gift, along with other miraculous abilities, ceased after the death of the apostles and those upon whom they directly imparted such gifts. Today, praying in tongues, often portrayed in modern charismatic movements as ecstatic or unintelligible utterances, does not align with the biblical pattern and is not a manifestation of God’s Holy Spirit. Instead, true prayer is directed to Jehovah through Jesus Christ, guided by the Scriptures, and conducted in a manner that is understandable and edifying to both the individual and the congregation. The verses cited—Romans 8:26, 1 Corinthians 14:4-17, Ephesians 6:18, and Jude 1:20—must be interpreted using the historical-grammatical method, considering the original context, the purpose of the writings, and the overall harmony of the Bible.
The Biblical Context of Speaking in Tongues
In the first century C.E., the gift of speaking in tongues served a specific role in the establishment of Christianity. As recorded in Acts 2:4-11, on the day of Pentecost in 33 C.E., the disciples were filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in tongues, enabling devout Jews from various nations to hear the message in their own languages. This miracle confirmed that Jehovah’s favor had shifted from the Jewish nation to the newly formed Christian congregation, fulfilling prophecies such as Joel 2:28-29. Archaeological evidence from the period, including inscriptions and papyri from the Roman Empire, reveals a multilingual society where Greek, Aramaic, Latin, and numerous regional dialects coexisted, making such a gift practical for evangelism. The tongues were not gibberish but actual human languages, as the hearers recognized them clearly. This understanding is crucial because it distinguishes the biblical gift from contemporary claims of glossolalia, which often lack verifiable linguistic structure.
The apostle Paul, writing under inspiration around 55 C.E., addressed the misuse of this gift in the Corinthian congregation, where some were speaking in tongues without interpretation, leading to confusion rather than upbuilding. In 1 Corinthians 12:4-11, Paul lists tongues as one of the gifts of the Spirit, distributed according to God’s will, not for personal show but for the common good. By the time of his letter, the congregation in Corinth, a bustling port city with diverse cultural influences as evidenced by excavated artifacts from the Isthmian Games and trade routes, had incorporated pagan elements into their worship, prompting Paul’s corrective counsel. The gift was to cease, as Paul foretold in 1 Corinthians 13:8, where he stated that tongues would be done away with when that which is complete arrives, referring to the completion of the Christian Greek Scriptures and the maturation of the congregation.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Examining Romans 8:26
Romans 8:26 states: “In the same way the Spirit also comes to the aid of our weakness; for the problem of what we should pray for as we need to we do not know, but the Spirit itself pleads for us with groanings unuttered.” This verse, penned by Paul around 56 C.E. during his stay in Corinth, addresses the role of the Holy Spirit in assisting Christians amid the difficulties arising from human imperfection, Satan, demons, and a wicked world. We view the “groanings unuttered” not as speaking in tongues but as the holy spirit’s intercession on behalf of believers when words fail them. The Greek term stenagmois alalētois, translated as “groanings unuttered,” implies inarticulate expressions of deep emotion, similar to the sighs of creation mentioned in Romans 8:22. Archaeological insights from first-century Roman letters and epitaphs show that people often expressed grief or supplication through non-verbal means, aligning with this scriptural description.
In the context of the chapter, Paul contrasts the fleshly mindset with the spiritual one, emphasizing that the Holy Spirit helps Christians align their prayers with Jehovah’s will. This is not an indwelling of the Spirit, as We teach that the Holy Spirit is gained through taking in an accurate knowledge (epignosis), not dwelling within individuals. Again, it operates through the inspired Word, guiding prayers to be in harmony with biblical principles. For instance, when a Christian faces severe persecution, as was common in the Roman Empire with its amphitheaters and coliseums bearing witness to martyr executions, the spirit aids by bringing to mind scriptural promises, enabling effective prayer without the need for miraculous tongues.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Insights From 1 Corinthians 14:4-17
The passage in 1 Corinthians 14:4-17 provides detailed instructions on the proper use of tongues in the congregation. Paul writes: “The one speaking in a tongue builds up himself, but the one prophesying builds up a congregation. I wish all of you to speak in tongues, but rather that you prophesy. Indeed, greater is the one prophesying than the one speaking in tongues, unless he interprets, so that the congregation may receive upbuilding.” Here, Paul stresses that speaking in tongues without interpretation edifies only the speaker, whereas prophecy benefits all. Archaeological excavations in Corinth, revealing a city with temples to Apollo and Asclepius where ecstatic utterances were part of pagan rituals, explain why Paul needed to differentiate Christian practices from these.
We understand that praying in tongues, as implied in verses 13-15, where Paul says, “That is why the one speaking in a tongue should pray that he may interpret. For if I am praying in a tongue, my spirit is praying, but my mind is unfruitful,” refers to the first-century gift where a believer might pray in a foreign language inspired by the Spirit. However, such prayer required interpretation to be meaningful. Paul encourages praying with both spirit and mind, meaning prayers should be intelligible and thoughtful. Today, since the miraculous gifts have ceased, praying in tongues is not practiced. Claims of modern tongue-speaking often resemble the ecstatic babbling found in ancient mystery religions, as documented in inscriptions from Delphi and other sites, which the Bible condemns as not from Jehovah.
Furthermore, verses 16-17 highlight that without understanding, others cannot say “Amen” to the prayer, rendering it ineffective for the congregation. In the early Christian meetings, held in homes or simple structures as archaeology confirms through discoveries like the house churches in Ephesus, clarity was essential for unity. We apply this by ensuring all prayers in their meetings are spoken in the common language, allowing all to participate mentally and spiritually.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Understanding Ephesians 6:18
Ephesians 6:18 instructs: “While with every form of prayer and supplication you carry on prayer on every occasion in Spirit.” Written by Paul around 60-61 C.E. while imprisoned in Rome, this letter to the congregation in Ephesus, a city renowned for its grand theater and library as unearthed by archaeologists, emphasizes the Christian’s spiritual armor against demonic forces. “Praying in spirit” here means praying under the influence of God’s Holy Spirit, in accord with His will as revealed in the Scriptures, not in ecstatic tongues.
We see this as a call to persistent, scripturally guided prayer. The Greek phrase en pneumati denotes being in a spiritual frame of mind, aligned with Jehovah’s purposes. In the context of the full armor of God described in verses 10-17, prayer is the means to stand firm against Satan’s schemes. Archaeological evidence from Roman military artifacts, such as shields and helmets, illustrates the metaphor Paul uses, showing how Christians must be equipped spiritually. Today, this involves studying the Bible daily and applying its principles in prayer, without relying on miraculous gifts that were temporary.
![]() |
![]() |
The Meaning of Jude 1:20
Jude 1:20 exhorts: “But you, beloved ones, by building up yourselves on your most holy faith, praying in the Holy Spirit, keep yourselves in God’s love.” Composed around 65 C.E. by Jude, the half-brother of Jesus, this letter warns against apostate intruders in the congregation. “Praying in Holy Spirit” parallels Ephesians 6:18, signifying prayers directed by God’s active force through adherence to His Word.
We interpret this as maintaining a close relationship with Jehovah by praying in harmony with biblical truths, building faith through study and application. The context of the verse, amid warnings about ungodly men who turn God’s undeserved kindness into an excuse for brazen conduct, underscores the need for pure, scripturally based worship. Archaeological findings from the Judean region, including scrolls and ossuaries from the first century, affirm the early Christians’ emphasis on doctrinal purity over mystical experiences.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Historical Cessation of Miraculous Gifts
The miraculous gifts, including tongues, were signs to unbelievers, as Paul notes in 1 Corinthians 14:22, and served to establish the Christian congregation. By the end of the first century, with the completion of the Greek Scriptures around 98 C.E., these gifts were no longer necessary. Historical records from early church fathers, aligned with conservative scholarship, indicate that such miracles faded after the apostolic era. We point to this as fulfillment of prophecy, ensuring that faith is based on the written Word rather than ongoing signs.
In modern times, phenomena claimed as praying in tongues often stem from emotionalism or demonic influence, contrary to the orderliness Jehovah requires in worship (1 Corinthians 14:33, 40). True Christians pray with understanding, using words that reflect scriptural knowledge and gratitude to Jehovah.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Application in Christian Life Today
We emphasize that effective prayer involves approaching Jehovah through Jesus, as taught in John 14:6, with a clean conscience and in faith. Prayers should be specific, humble, and persistent, covering thanks, petitions, and praise. The model prayer in Matthew 6:9-13 serves as a guide, focusing on Jehovah’s name, kingdom, and will. In congregation meetings, public prayers are offered by qualified men, ensuring edification for all.
When facing difficulties, Christians rely on the Holy Spirit’s guidance through the Bible, not through inutterable groanings or tongues. For example, in times of illness or persecution, prayer brings comfort as the Spirit recalls promises like Psalm 34:19, where Jehovah delivers the righteous from all distresses.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Archaeological Corroboration of First-Century Practices
Excavations in ancient cities like Jerusalem, where the upper room of Pentecost may have been located, and Pompeii, preserving daily life under Roman rule, provide a backdrop for understanding the multilingual environment that necessitated the gift of tongues. Inscriptions in multiple languages on synagogues and public buildings confirm the diversity Paul addressed. These findings support the biblical account that tongues were real languages for evangelism, not private prayer languages.
Moreover, artifacts from early Christian burials, lacking evidence of ecstatic rituals, align with the scriptural shift to faith-based worship without miracles. This historical-grammatical approach affirms that praying in tongues was confined to the apostolic age.
The Bible’s harmony demands that all teachings on prayer cohere, rejecting any interpretation that introduces division or mysticism. We uphold this by teaching that true spirituality comes from obeying God’s Word, not from supernatural displays.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |



























Leave a Reply