Waxed Tablets

Before a Christian scribe ever laid a reed pen to papyrus, waxed tablets served as the ancient world’s quick, reusable notepad. A tablet consisted of a shallow wooden frame filled with dark beeswax. Writers used a stylus—metal, bone, or hardwood—with a pointed end to incise letters and a flat, spatula-like end to smooth the wax for corrections or reuse. Schoolboys learned letters and copy-exercises on tablets, merchants kept accounts, and officials jotted memoranda. Because wax accepted a fine point and allowed instant revision, tablets were ideal for dictation drafts and temporary notes. Early Christian communities, which formed in the decades after Jesus’ death in 33 C.E., appear to have used such tablets for preliminary composition, itineraries, and delivery notes carried by couriers. Tablets also accompanied papyrus rolls and codices in the scribe’s toolkit, providing a surface for collation lists, stichometric counts, or running tallies when a text was checked against an exemplar. The durability and reusability of tablets explain their frequent appearance in archaeological finds across the Mediterranean; yet their very reusability means their Christian content rarely survives. What matters for New Testament textual history is that tablets demonstrate how drafts and paratextual aids could be prepared before the fair copy was made on papyrus or parchment.

Papyrus

Papyrus, harvested from the Nile’s Cyperus papyrus, supplied the earliest writing surface for New Testament books and letters. Manufacturers sliced the pith into thin strips and laid them in two crisscrossing layers, pressing and drying them so that fibers ran horizontally on one face (recto) and vertically on the other (verso). Sheets were joined edge to edge with a starch-based glue, forming rolls, or were stacked and folded into gatherings to create codices. The recto’s horizontal fibers guided the pen and reduced feathering, which is why scribes preferred to write on the recto in scrolls and often on both sides in codices when economy demanded.

Egypt’s dry climate preserved a remarkable number of papyri, including second- and third-century New Testament witnesses. Among the earliest are P52 (125–150 C.E.), a codex scrap of John; P66 (125–150 C.E.), a substantial Johannine codex; and P75 (175–225 C.E.), a carefully executed codex of Luke and John. These papyri are crucial not merely because they are early, but because their controlled hands and disciplined copying show that Christians adopted professional book production practices by the late second century. The similarity of P75 to Codex Vaticanus in Luke and John demonstrates continuity rather than a later editorial reshaping, supporting confidence that our text reaches back to a remarkably stable form.

Papyrus sheets were not cheap, but they were accessible enough to support brisk copying during the explosion of Christian literature in the second and third centuries. Scribes ruled lines lightly with a dry point, created margins to accommodate corrections and lectional signs, and often left a broad lower margin both for handling and for a subscription if the work required one. Even on papyrus, layout conventions—columns, ekthesis (slightly projecting initials signalling paragraphs), and punctuation marks—already appear in more professional products.

Parchment

Parchment, animal skin prepared through soaking, dehairing, stretching, scraping, and smoothing, furnished a stronger, more flexible surface than papyrus and tolerated greater erasure and correction. The hair side is often darker and more textured; the flesh side is lighter and smoother. In well-planned codices, bifolia were arranged so that flesh faced flesh and hair faced hair across an opening, producing a visual uniformity prized by book artisans. Chalk or pumice provided tooth for the ink; pricking along the outer margins established alignment for ruling across the page.

The best-known great uncial codices of the fourth and fifth centuries—Codex Vaticanus (300–330 C.E.) and Codex Sinaiticus (330–360 C.E.)—are parchment, as are many later minuscules. Parchment’s resilience allowed extensive correction without compromising legibility, a feature visible in the careful erasures and supralinear additions throughout these codices. Palimpsests, in which older text was scraped and overwritten, also survive; Codex Ephraemi Rescriptus is a classic example of a New Testament text partially recovered beneath later writing. Parchment’s cost was higher than papyrus, yet its longevity and reusability suited works that communities intended to preserve, read aloud, and copy again.

Paper

Paper reached Greek- and Syriac-speaking lands from the east and entered Byzantine book production as early as the ninth century C.E., becoming common from the twelfth century onward. It was cheaper than parchment, enabling a surge in the number of minuscules and lectionaries. Early papers were sized with gelatin to control ink spread; watermarks introduced in the later medieval period assist with regional and chronological identification. Because paper abrades more easily than parchment, lavish illumination gave way in many practical copies to simpler, text-centered layouts. This shift does not indicate a decline in scribal skill; rather, it shows the democratization of bookmaking that placed more New Testament texts in the hands of churches and schools. The overwhelming majority of Greek New Testament manuscripts are minuscule copies, and a significant portion of these are on paper.

Implements People Used for Writing

The ancient scribe’s kit was standardized. For drafting on tablets one used a stylus, point and eraser combined. For literary copying, the primary instrument was the reed pen (calamus), cut from Nile reeds, with a chisel or quill-like nib cut at an angle to control stroke contrast. By late antiquity the feather quill became more common in some regions, though reeds remained standard for centuries. Two principal inks appear. Carbon ink was made from lampblack mixed with water and a binding agent such as gum arabic; it sits on the surface of the writing material and can be lifted with a wet sponge, making it excellent for correction on parchment. Iron-gall ink—derived from tannic acid and iron salts—bites into the writing surface and resists smudging, but over many centuries can erode parchment fibers. Red ink, using minium or cinnabar, highlighted headings, Eusebian canon numbers, or lectional starts. Ruling was incised with a hard point or drawn faintly in ink; pricking along the outer edge established line spacing, and quire signatures were added at the foot of the page to ensure proper assembly.

In many Christian communities a dictator read aloud from an exemplar to several copyists, a method useful for speed but requiring vigilant proofing to prevent homophonic confusions. More often, especially for high-quality work, the scribe copied with eyes moving silently from exemplar to new page, a practice that reduced oral-induced errors and encouraged disciplined stichometry. Corrections were integral to the process. Scribes signaled deletion with dots above letters, erased with a knife, wrote supralinear additions, or inserted marginal signs pointing to the place of insertion. All of this evidences a craft culture devoted to accuracy.

“Books” in Ancient Times

Ancient readers knew two principal book forms, and Christians used both in the first generations of the faith. The New Testament itself was written within a living book culture that was already centuries old by the time Paul wrote to the Thessalonians around 50 C.E. and to Timothy in the early 60s C.E.

The Scroll

The scroll was constructed from papyrus sheets glued edge to edge, wrapped around a wooden rod. Text was written in narrow columns perpendicular to the rod, usually on the recto with horizontal fibers. Scrolls could reach considerable length, but practical handling favored works of moderate size. For a text like Isaiah, a long scroll was normal; for multiple apostolic letters, multiple rolls were common. Titles could appear on small tags (sittyboi) tied to the outside or on the end sheet. Reading involved unrolling with one hand while rolling up with the other, a process that made pinpoint reference slower but not impractical. Early Christian preaching in synagogues and homes presumed familiarity with scroll reading; yet, as Christian literature multiplied, the scroll’s limitations for compiling multi-text collections became clear.

The Codex

The codex—sheets stacked, folded, and sewn along one edge—revolutionized access. Christians embraced the codex earlier and more widely than surrounding literary cultures because it placed multiple works into a single portable object and allowed quick reference by page. Papyrus codices such as P46 (Pauline letters), P66 (John), and P75 (Luke–John) show that by the late second century the codex was the preferred form for authoritative Christian texts. Eusebian canon tables, running heads (titloi), kephalaia lists, and sophisticated pagination marks—features that become staples in later parchment codices—had their conceptual roots in this codex culture. Binding practices varied, but a common method used gatherings (quires) of four to eight bifolia, sewn with linen thread through kettle stitches and reinforced at the spine. Page layout stabilized into one or two columns with measured margins to protect text from trimming and to reserve space for marginalia. The codex’s practical superiority encouraged standardization and fostered the careful copying now visible in the major uncials of the fourth and fifth centuries.

The Handwriting in the Manuscripts

From before the beginning of the Christian era Greek handwriting developed in two complementary channels. Uncial, a rounded majuscule comparable in shape to modern capital letters, dominated the copying of literary works for centuries. Letters stand separately, broadly formed, and written with disciplined pen lifts. New Testament uncials exhibit scripta continua, the convention of writing without spaces between words. This practice did not arise from crowding but from long-standing scribal custom. Early uncial copies also omit accent and breathing marks, which later hands added. Punctuation remains minimal in the earliest witnesses—a high point or medial point indicates pauses—though more sophisticated systems appear by late antiquity.

Alongside uncial stood cursive hands used for everyday communication. Cursive shows more ligatures, letter connections, and rapidly executed strokes; it was employed in receipts, letters, and notes. The personal character of Paul’s letters to Timothy, Titus, and Philemon suits a cursive documentary hand at original production, with an amanuensis writing swiftly under dictation and then producing a cleaner copy when needed for circulation. This is consistent with first-century epistolary practice and with the presence of subscriptions and greetings that reflect a live dictation environment.

By the early ninth century a new script family arose from a refined documentary tradition: minuscule. The letters are smaller, more compact, and often connected, yet more formal than everyday cursive. Minuscule increased copying speed without sacrificing legibility, which catalyzed an enormous expansion of book production. One of the oldest dated minuscule Gospel manuscripts bears the year 835 C.E., anchoring the script’s maturation in the early medieval period. Over the next century minuscule displaced uncial for biblical copying; by the end of the tenth century the era of new uncial production had closed. A simple rule of thumb follows: uncial manuscripts belong to the eleventh century or earlier, while minuscules belong to the ninth century or later. Roughly ninety percent of known Greek New Testament manuscripts are minuscules, a statistic that reflects historical copying habits rather than textual superiority or inferiority as such.

Ornamentation tracks with chronology. Early manuscripts, both uncial and minuscule, keep decoration minimal; later copies display headpieces, colored initials, and intricate canon tables, features often called illumination. Such decoration aids navigation and liturgical use but can never substitute for the accuracy of the letterforms. More important for textual study are the conventions that regulate sacred names. Scribes wrote a stable set of “nomina sacra,” sacred names abbreviated by the first and last letters (sometimes more) and marked by a horizontal overline. Among them are “God” (ΘΣ), “Lord” (ΚΣ), “Jesus” (ΙΣ), “Christ” (ΧΣ), “Spirit” (ΠΝΑ), “Son” (ΥΣ), “Father” (ΠΡ), and “Jerusalem” (ΙΛΗΜ). The consistent use of these abbreviations from the earliest papyri onward reveals that Christian scribes copied within a disciplined tradition that recognized the reverential status of these names while preserving unambiguous readings.

Punctuation and paratext advance across the centuries. Paragraph markers, the paragraphos and forked diple, signal transitions; ekthesis moves the first letter of a new sense-unit into the left margin; stichometric counts appear at the close of books to certify length, an aid that deterred accidental omission. Eusebian canons cross-reference Gospel pericopes, and marginal notes supply kephalaia numbers that evolving lectionaries later reused. Breathings and accents, while absent in early copies, were added by trained correctors once the accentual system became standard for school use. None of these innovations creates the text; all of them serve the text already received and carefully transmitted.

Scribal Skills

The quality of surviving manuscripts mirrors the abilities of the hands that produced them. Not every copyist was equal. Some worked at speed to meet the needs of mission and worship; others executed pages with measured care for longevity. The range may be described in four broad profiles that arise naturally from the documentary record.

The common hand belongs to writers with limited control of Greek letterforms, often individuals trained primarily for practical tasks. Strokes vary in angle and width, alignment wavers, and letter proportions shift within a line. Yet even such copies, when produced under faithful dictation or careful comparison, can preserve the correct text. The documentary hand refers to scribes accustomed to everyday documents—receipts, contracts, petitions—who carry those habits into literary copying. Features include a larger initial letter at the start of a line, inconsistent but serviceable ruling, and occasional fusion of letters. These copies are generally legible and, when supervised, reliable.

A reformed documentary hand appears when a scribe recognizes the higher demands of literary work. The letterforms retain some documentary flavor but show a conscious effort toward uniformity, clearer separation, and steadier ruling. Many papyrus New Testament codices sit in this category, where discipline and speed meet. Finally, the professional bookhand manifests the canons of formal book production. Letters are proportioned, rhythm of strokes is even, word-division devices are applied sparingly but effectively, and the mise-en-page shows planning. The Gospel codex P4+64+67 (150–175 C.E.) exemplifies such craft, with balanced columns, paragraph markers, and judicious punctuation. In this stratum, professional standards stand behind the page, and the result is both beautiful and textually reliable.

Scribal competence expresses itself not only in appearance but in error control. The best bookhands demonstrate awareness of common pitfalls—homoeoteleuton, where the eye skips from one ending to a similar ending; dittography, where a letter or word is written twice; and itacism, where similar-sounding vowels and diphthongs are confused. High-value manuscripts show robust strategies against these intrusions: consistent line length, cautious hyphenation, marginal correction signs keyed to lines, and stichometric back-checking. Corrections appear in the same hand shortly after copying or in later hands as the manuscript was read and rechecked. In parchment codices, erasure with a knife and rewriting could completely remove a mistake. On papyrus, where erasure is difficult, supralinear additions and marginal notes predominate. Far from undermining confidence, these corrections prove the commitment of Christian scribes to preserve the text as received.

The broader manuscript tradition confirms this commitment. The close agreement between the second–third-century papyrus P75 and the fourth-century parchment Codex Vaticanus across Luke and John—roughly eighty-three percent at the detailed variant level—anchors the text well before later medieval transmission. Rather than reflecting a late editorial recension, the Alexandrian witnesses preserve a text whose roots lie in the earliest period of copying. When later Byzantine and Western witnesses diverge, they are valuable as historical testimony and often preserve independent readings; yet the earliest papyri and the most disciplined uncials guide the reconstruction of the original wording when the evidence is weighed by the documentary method.

Script choice also reflects purpose. Uncial suited monumental literary copying on papyrus and parchment through late antiquity, featuring generous margins, clear columnar layouts, and limited ornamentation. Cursive and reformed documentary styles served personal letters, provisional copies, and swift dissemination. Minuscule then delivered the best of both worlds, accelerating production without sacrificing clarity. The dated minuscule of 835 C.E., coupled with a surging paper supply in later centuries, explains the overwhelming numerical dominance of minuscule New Testament manuscripts while leaving the earliest strata of the text already established.

The physical page communicates as much as the letters themselves. Quire signatures at the foot of last pages of gatherings, catchwords at the end of a quire repeating the first word of the next, and consistent pricking and ruling testify to controlled bookshops or monastic scriptoria that functioned with professional care. Subscriptions at the end of books enumerate stichoi, name the scribe, or mention that the copy was collated against an exemplar. Some subscriptions carry chronological notices or place names, enabling reconstruction of a manuscript’s journey. These concrete features anchor New Testament textual study in observable data and free it from speculative reconstructions that ignore the page’s testimony.

Liturgical use shaped the page as well. Lectional signs in the margins, rubrics in red ink marking reading starts and stops, and later chapter divisions respond to worship needs without imposing themselves upon the text. The consistent application of nomina sacra without exception across both literary and documentary contexts again speaks to a unified scribal culture. Even when ornament blooms in medieval copies—headpieces, arcaded canon tables, and historiated initials—the heart of the page remains a disciplined text, carefully aligned with its exemplar and guarded by the scribe’s rules of craft.

The cumulative portrait is concrete and verifiable. Christians wrote on waxed tablets for drafts and lists, copied Scripture on papyrus codices in the second and third centuries, advanced to parchment for permanence and correctional ease, and later employed paper to multiply access. They used reed pens and carbon inks, planned pages with ruling and pricking, and observed stable conventions such as scripta continua and sacred-name abbreviations. They chose the codex to gather Gospels and apostolic letters together, making reference faster and collation easier. They developed from uncial to minuscule without loss of textual control and maintained high standards in professional bookhands. The manuscript evidence—papyri, uncials, and minuscules—coheres with this trajectory and shows that providential preservation operated through ordinary means: skilled hands, careful eyes, and communities that valued the written Word enough to copy and recopy it faithfully from the first century onward.

You May Also Enjoy

The Practice of New Testament Textual Criticism: How to Read a Critical Apparatus and Resolve Key Variants

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS