1 Corinthians 13:10 – τὸ τέλειον (to teleion) Rightly Understood as the Mature, Completed Word

In 1 Corinthians 13:8–10, Paul addresses the temporary nature of miraculous spiritual gifts by contrasting them with the enduring permanence of love and the coming of what he calls “the perfect.” A misreading of this phrase—τὸ τέλειον (to teleion)—has led to widespread doctrinal errors, particularly the idea that Paul was referring to the Second Coming of Christ. However, a close grammatical, contextual, and theological examination of the passage reveals that Paul was speaking not of Christ’s return but of the completion of divine revelation—namely, the full maturity of God’s Word.

Context: Temporary Gifts and Enduring Love

Paul writes:

“Love never fails. But if there are gifts of prophecy, they will be done away with; if tongues, they will cease; if knowledge, it will be done away with. For we know in part and we prophesy in part; but when the perfect comes, the partial will be done away.” (1 Corinthians 13:8–10)

Paul’s argument is simple: certain gifts were partial and provisional. They existed to build up the church during a time of incomplete revelation, when God’s redemptive plan was still unfolding and the full canon of Scripture had not yet been given. Tongues, prophecy, and knowledge (i.e., revelatory insight) served to fill the gap, so to speak, between the initial apostolic preaching and the completion of inspired Scripture.

But these gifts were not permanent. They were limited in function and duration, designed to cease once the church reached a point of maturity—a maturity not in numerical growth or eschatological arrival, but in doctrinal completeness.

Grammatical Clarity: To Teleion as a Neuter Singular

The Greek term τὸ τέλειον is neuter, not masculine. If Paul had intended to refer to Christ personally, he would have used a masculine form—such as ὁ τέλειος (ho teleios). The neuter form points to a thing, not a person. This alone disqualifies interpretations that see this verse as referring directly to Jesus’ return.

Moreover, teleion means “complete,” “mature,” or “fully developed.” It is the same word used in passages such as Hebrews 5:14 and James 1:25 to refer to maturity, fullness, or perfection in knowledge and understanding—not in eschatological finality, but in spiritual and doctrinal completeness.

The Mirror and Face-to-Face Imagery

Paul continues:

“For now we see in a mirror dimly, but then face to face; now I know in part, but then I will know fully just as I also have been fully known.” (1 Corinthians 13:12)

This verse has been wrongly interpreted to suggest a beatific vision of Christ at the Second Coming. However, that assumption ignores the contextual flow and historical setting.

In the ancient world, mirrors were polished metal—not clear glass—and produced imperfect reflections. Paul is not using this metaphor to contrast earthly life with heavenly glory, but partial knowledge with complete understanding. “Face to face” is a Hebraic expression for directness or clarity, used elsewhere in Scripture (e.g., Numbers 12:8) to describe the clarity of God’s communication, not a physical encounter.

Thus, “face to face” here refers to the shift from fragmentary revelation through miraculous gifts to complete and sufficient knowledge through the written Word. Likewise, “then I shall know fully” refers to the believer’s access to God’s completed self-revelation—not omniscience or glorification.

Historical Theological Evidence

The revelatory gifts of prophecy, tongues, and supernatural knowledge disappeared from the early church after the death of the apostles and the closing of the canon. There is no valid evidence—biblical or historical—that these gifts were normative beyond the first century. As noted previously, early church writers themselves regarded such phenomena as belonging to the apostolic era, and even by the second century, they were virtually nonexistent.

Paul’s reference to the coming of “the perfect” is thus best understood as the point at which the revelatory phase of the church came to an end, and the church was equipped solely by the written, inspired Scriptures—which Paul later describes as “able to make you wise for salvation” and sufficient “for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness” (2 Timothy 3:15–17).

Theological Implications

This interpretation aligns fully with Paul’s theology of progressive revelation leading to final sufficiency. The apostles were foundational (Ephesians 2:20)—not permanent. Once their work of receiving and communicating divine revelation was finished, the partial was done away, and the church transitioned to its mature, Word-regulated state.

This also serves as a direct refutation of charismatic continuationism, which wrongly insists that tongues, prophecy, and direct revelation continue today. Such claims fundamentally contradict Paul’s argument in 1 Corinthians 13, misrepresent the nature of spiritual maturity, and obscure the sufficiency of Scripture.

Conclusion: No Need to Wait for Christ’s Return

Paul is not telling the church to wait for the Second Coming to experience full spiritual clarity. Rather, he is pointing them forward to a point in time when the piecemeal delivery of God’s Word through temporary gifts would be replaced by the complete and final deposit of truth—which we now possess in the sixty-six inspired books of the Bible.

Therefore, to teleion in 1 Corinthians 13:10 refers not to the eschaton, but to the completion of the canon of Scripture—the perfect, sufficient, and enduring revelation that makes further miraculous signs unnecessary and obsolete.

You May Also Enjoy

Gifts Defined: Functional Graces, Not Personal Possessions – 1 Corinthians 12:4–7

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS