The narrative in Genesis 37:25-36 records the sale of Joseph into Egyptian slavery with precise details that have prompted questions from readers across generations. After Joseph’s brothers cast him into an empty cistern, a caravan approached carrying trade goods from Gilead toward Egypt. Genesis 37:25 identifies the merchants as Ishmaelites, while verse 28 describes Midianite traders who pulled Joseph from the pit and sold him for twenty pieces of silver. Verse 36 then states that the Midianites sold Joseph to Potiphar in Egypt. At first glance, the shift between “Ishmaelites” and “Midianites” appears to introduce inconsistency in the identity of the buyers and sellers. A careful examination of the biblical text, grounded in the historical-grammatical method, reveals that the inspired account uses both terms accurately and without contradiction to describe the very same group of traveling merchants.

The events took place approximately in 1898 B.C.E., during the patriarchal era when the descendants of Abraham’s various lines had established distinct yet interconnected tribal identities. Ishmael, born to Abraham and Hagar, fathered twelve tribal chiefs whose descendants roamed the regions from Havilah as far as Shur, near Egypt (Genesis 25:12-18). Midian, born to Abraham and Keturah, produced descendants who settled primarily in the northwestern Arabian Peninsula and engaged in nomadic trade and herding (Genesis 25:1-4). By Joseph’s time, both Ishmaelite and Midianite groups participated actively in the lucrative caravan trade routes that linked Gilead, the Transjordan, and the Nile Delta. These routes carried spices, balm, and myrrh—precisely the commodities mentioned in Genesis 37:25—making joint expeditions practical for protection against bandits and for shared economic benefit.

Scripture itself provides the clearest resolution to the question of terminology. Judges 8:24 reports that after Gideon’s victory over the Midianite oppressors, the Israelites stripped the enemy of their gold earrings “because they were Ishmaelites.” The sacred writer directly equates the Midianites with Ishmaelites in this context, demonstrating that the names functioned interchangeably when referring to certain nomadic trading or raiding bands. This biblical precedent confirms that ancient Israelite authors recognized fluid tribal associations among related Abrahamic peoples. A caravan originating from Ishmaelite-dominated territories could include Midianite members, or a predominantly Midianite group could adopt the broader Ishmaelite label due to shared customs, intermarriage, or geographic overlap. The same merchants could therefore bear both designations depending on the perspective of the observer or the emphasis of the narrator.

In the Genesis 37 account, the brothers first spotted the caravan from a distance while sitting down to eat (verse 25). From that vantage point, Judah identified the approaching group as Ishmaelites, likely because the caravan displayed characteristics typical of Ishmaelite traders—camels laden with Arabian goods and traveling from the eastern desert regions associated with Ishmael’s descendants. This initial identification set the scene accurately. When the narrative describes the actual transaction, it specifies that “Midianite traders” drew Joseph out of the cistern and sold him to the Ishmaelites (verse 28). The text distinguishes the actors in the immediate act of extraction and negotiation as Midianites, possibly because that subgroup took the lead in the physical handling of Joseph or because Midianites formed the core bargaining party within the larger caravan. Genesis 39:1 later reinforces the primary identity by stating that Potiphar purchased Joseph “from the hand of the Ishmaelites who had taken him down to Egypt,” returning to the Ishmaelite designation for the group as a whole.

This layered use of terms reflects the natural flexibility of language in ancient Near Eastern historiography. The inspired text does not demand rigid, modern-style ethnic categorization that excludes overlap. Instead, Moses, writing under divine direction, employed both names because both applied truthfully to the merchants involved. The caravan was Ishmaelite in its broader ethnic and regional character, yet Midianite in the specific tribal identity of those who executed the purchase. No grammatical or logical conflict arises when the reader accepts that one unified company of traders carried dual legitimate labels. The account progresses coherently: the brothers saw Ishmaelite merchants, Midianites among them lifted Joseph from the pit, the group bought him, and Midianites completed the delivery to Egypt.

Such apparent variations in naming occur elsewhere in Scripture without implying error. Related groups frequently merged for travel, warfare, or commerce, and biblical writers described them according to context. The Kenites, for instance, maintained ties to Midian while preserving their distinct identity (Judges 1:16). The same principle applies here. The Holy Spirit guided the composition of Genesis to present reliable history that highlights Jehovah’s sovereign control over Joseph’s journey into Egypt, fulfilling His purpose to preserve the family of Jacob during the coming famine.

Skeptics who allege contradiction often rely on source-critical assumptions that fragment the Pentateuch into competing traditions—one supposedly favoring “Ishmaelites” and another “Midianites.” Conservative evangelical scholarship rejects such division, affirming Mosaic authorship of a unified Pentateuch. The text stands as a single, coherent narrative written with divine inerrancy. No ancient manuscript tradition—whether Masoretic Hebrew, Septuagint Greek, or Samaritan Pentateuch—alters the sequence or introduces variants that force a contradiction. The Hebrew terms remain consistent: yishmeʿelim for Ishmaelites and midyanim for Midianites, allowing both to describe the same historical entity.

This resolution upholds the trustworthiness of Scripture at every point. If Genesis 37 contained an irreconcilable error here, it would undermine confidence in the surrounding chapters that portray Jehovah’s hand guiding Joseph from the pit to Pharaoh’s court. Yet the account demonstrates perfect harmony. The merchants who carried Joseph southward were Ishmaelites by heritage and association, Midianites by immediate tribal participation, and the entire transaction unfolded exactly as recorded. Jehovah used this real caravan of real traders—bearing accurate dual names—to advance His redemptive plan through the preservation of the covenant line.

The question “Was Joseph sold to Ishmaelites or Midianites?” therefore receives a definitive biblical answer: He was sold to a caravan that Scripture truthfully identifies by both names, reflecting the historical reality of interrelated Abrahamic tribes engaged in joint commerce. The text honors that reality without compromise, affirming the full inerrancy and reliability of the inspired Word.

You May Also Enjoy

What Is the Point of the Command Found at Leviticus 19:16 Not to “Stand Up Against the Blood” of Your Fellow Man?

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS