Please Help Us Keep These Thousands of Blog Posts Growing and Free for All

$5.00

Many ancient secular historians corroborate the Bible, its history, and the historicity of the people, places, and events described within it. Their works serve as valuable external sources that affirm the biblical narrative, bridging the gap between sacred and secular accounts of history. Understanding the contributions of these historians helps to provide a fuller picture of ancient times and underscores the reliability of the biblical record.

Classical Historians: How Dependable?

Historians of ancient Greece and Rome are heavily relied upon by modern scholars to fill gaps or confirm data in the history of the ancient world. Some scholars believe that these “classical” authorities offer a more dependable basis for chronology than the Bible. Therefore, it’s important to examine these early sources of history. How accurate and dependable are they?

Since the late 18th century of our Common Era, institutions of higher learning have extensively studied the writings of these “classical” historians—figures like Herodotus, Xenophon, Thucydides, and Plutarch. Generations of students have been taught to prefer the historical testimony of these ancient writers over that of the Holy Scriptures, despite many of these students professing to be Christian.

Isn’t it then necessary to scrutinize these secular sources more closely? We should be interested not only in their general worth but also in the motives that may have prompted them to write and whether they consistently provided accurate facts and dates. Were these men striving for accuracy and truth, or were some primarily seeking fame or simply entertaining?

Accuracy or Popularity?

The name Herodotus, a Greek historian of the fifth century B.C.E., comes to mind first. He is often called “the father of history,” and he certainly initiated a new trend in recording history with his imaginative and broad scope. As a storyteller, he excels. However, researchers today are concerned about certain aspects of his work. According to Professor A. W. Ahl in his “Outline of Persian History,” “A large number of inaccuracies are found in his reports.”

The Encyclopædia Britannica provides a relevant critique: “The chief defects of Herodotus are his failure to grasp the principles of historical criticism, to understand the nature of military operations, and to appreciate the importance of chronology. . . . most serious of all his deficiencies is his careless chronology. Even for the fifth century [his own era], the data which he affords are inadequate or ambiguous.”

While historians owe much to Herodotus for preserving a vast amount of facts and dates, some of which are quite accurate, there is no reason to accept all his data as infallibly true.

Xenophon was another Greek chronicler who had reached adulthood by the end of the fifth century B.C.E. His “Cyropaedia” has been described as “a political and philosophical romance.” Scholars note that in writing it, Xenophon “had little or nothing to build upon except the floating stories and traditions of the East that had gathered around the figure of the great Persian hero-king [Cyrus the younger].” It is also claimed that “a distinct moral purpose, to which literal truth is sacrificed, runs through the work.”

In his “Hellenica,” or Greek history, Xenophon is accused of displaying “unmistakable traces of a pettiness of mind and narrowness of view very far below the dignity of a historian.” There are “serious omissions and defects in the work, which greatly detract from its value.”—The Encyclopædia Britannica.

On the other hand, Xenophon’s works have their merits. “His description of places and of relative distances is very minute and painstaking. The researches of modern travelers attest to his general accuracy.” However, geographical accuracy alone is not sufficient to elevate his writings to a position rivaling the Bible in matters of chronological history.

Historian Ctesias, who also lived in the fifth century B.C.E., wrote “Persica,” which claims to be a history of Persia drawn from royal archives. George Rawlinson, in his “Seven Great Monarchies” (Volume 2, page 85), accuses Ctesias of deliberately extending the period of the Median monarchy “by the conscious use of a system of duplication. . . . Each king, or period, in Herodotus occurs in the list of Ctesias twice—a transparent device, clumsily cloaked by the cheap expedient of a liberal invention of names.” Ctesias’s testimony is also contradicted by the priest-historian Berossus, the philosopher Aristotle (4th century B.C.E.), and recently discovered cuneiform inscriptions.

How dependable, then, were those early historians? They were not so accurate and trustworthy that their data should go unchecked against other reliable facts. The Encyclopædia Britannica notes that Thucydides, a Greek historian of the same fifth century B.C.E., criticized chroniclers for caring only about popularity and not making their narratives trustworthy. However, Thucydides might have been somewhat severe in his judgment.

Thucydides: An Exception

Thucydides is widely regarded as an exception to the rule of inaccuracy and carelessness among the “classical” historians. The Encyclopædia Britannica states, “Thucydides stands alone among the men of his own days . . . in the width of mental grasp which could seize the general significance of particular events . . . In contrast with [his] predecessors, Thucydides has subjected his material to the most searching scrutiny.” The Encyclopedia Americana (1956 edition, Volume 26, page 596) adds, “As a historian, Thucydides holds the foremost place. He was painstaking and indefatigable in collecting and sifting facts, brief and terse in narrating them. His style is full of dignity and replete with condensed meaning.”

Thucydides’ careful and detailed approach to documenting the Peloponnesian War makes him a more reliable historian than many of his contemporaries. However, even his work should be examined critically to ensure the accuracy and reliability of his accounts.

Historians of the Classical Period

The term “classical” here applies to the period and culture of the ancient Greeks and Romans. Besides being a source of Greek and Roman history, the writings of certain classical historians are relied on by modern historians to fill in gaps or to confirm certain data in the records of ancient Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Persia, Syria, and Palestine. These historians often recorded events and details that intersect with biblical history, offering corroboration and additional context.

Greek Historians:

Herodotus (c. 484-425 B.C.E.): Often called the “Father of History,” Herodotus wrote “Histories,” a detailed record of his inquiry on the origins of the Greco-Persian Wars. Herodotus’ accounts provide valuable insights into the cultures and events of the ancient Near East, including the history of Egypt and Persia, which are integral to understanding the broader historical context in which the events of the Old Testament took place.
Thucydides (c. 471-401 B.C.E.): Known for his critical approach and strict standards of evidence, Thucydides wrote “The History of the Peloponnesian War,” detailing the conflict between Athens and Sparta. His work provides a meticulous account of Greek politics, war, and culture, which helps to contextualize the Greek world that interacted with ancient Israel and Judah.
Xenophon (c. 431-352 B.C.E.): A student of Socrates, Xenophon is known for his historical and philosophical writings, including “Anabasis” and “Hellenica.” His accounts of Persian and Greek history offer perspectives on the geopolitical dynamics of the region, providing background to events and figures mentioned in the Bible.
Ctesias (fifth-fourth century B.C.E.): A physician at the Persian court, Ctesias wrote “Persica,” a history of Persia, and “Indica,” about India. His works, though sometimes criticized for inaccuracy, offer details about the Persian Empire, which played a significant role in Jewish history, especially during the time of Esther and the post-exilic period.
Later historians such as Strabo, Diodorus Siculus, and Alexander Polyhistor of the first century B.C.E., as well as Plutarch of the first and second centuries C.E., provided additional layers of historical context. Strabo’s “Geographica” described the known world and included references to places and events pertinent to biblical narratives. Diodorus’ “Bibliotheca historica” is an important source for the history of the ancient world, including Egypt, Mesopotamia, and Persia. Plutarch’s “Parallel Lives” provides biographies of significant Greek and Roman figures, offering insights into the historical backdrop of the New Testament era.

Roman Historians:

Titus Livius or Livy (59 B.C.E.–17 C.E.): Livy’s monumental work “Ab Urbe Condita” traces the history of Rome from its legendary founding to his own time. His detailed accounts of Roman politics, culture, and military conquests help to contextualize the New Testament period, particularly the Roman occupation of Judea.
Tacitus (c. 56 – c. 120 C.E.): Considered one of Rome’s greatest historians, Tacitus wrote “Annals” and “Histories,” covering the Roman Empire from the death of Augustus to the First Jewish-Roman War. His works provide invaluable information on the political and social environment of the early Christian era, including references to Jesus, John the Baptist, and early Christians.
Gnaeus Pompeius Trogus, a contemporary of Livy, authored “Historiae Philippicae,” a universal history that, although surviving only in summary by Justin, offers insights into the histories of Macedonia, the Near East, and other regions impacting biblical narratives.
Pliny the Elder (23-79 C.E.): In his “Naturalis Historia,” Pliny compiled an encyclopedia of knowledge covering a wide range of topics. His references to the geography, flora, fauna, and peoples of the Roman Empire provide a backdrop to the world described in the Bible.
Sextus Julius Africanus (3rd cent. C.E.): Likely born in Libya, Africanus was an early Christian historian who wrote “Chronographiai,” a five-volume set of world history. His work sought to synchronize biblical events with historical chronology, making it a valuable resource for understanding the intersection of biblical and secular history.

Other Significant Sources:

Manetho (3rd Cent. B.C.E.) and Berossus (3rd Cent. B.C.E.): Manetho, an Egyptian priest and historian, compiled a history of Egypt that provides a framework for the dynastic chronology often used to date biblical events. Berossus, a Babylonian priest, wrote a history of Babylon that includes references to events and figures mentioned in the Bible, such as the Flood and the Tower of Babel.
Josephus (37-100 C.E.): A Jewish historian whose writings are indispensable for the first century C.E., Josephus’ works, including “The Jewish War” and “Antiquities of the Jews,” provide a detailed account of Jewish history from the Maccabean revolt to the fall of Jerusalem in 70 C.E. His descriptions of the Herodian dynasty, the Roman occupation, and early Christian figures offer critical corroboration of New Testament events, including references to Jesus, James, Jesus’ half brother, and John the Baptist.
Eusebius (260-340 C.E.): An ecclesiastical historian and bishop of Caesarea (c. 260-340 C.E.), Eusebius wrote “Ecclesiastical History,” documenting the early church from the time of Christ to Constantine. His work provides vital links between biblical accounts and the historical developments of early Christianity.

Corroborating the Bible

These classical historians not only provide a broader understanding of ancient civilizations but also often corroborate biblical accounts, thereby enhancing the historical credibility of the Bible and enriching our knowledge of the past. For instance, Josephus’ accounts align with the New Testament on figures such as Herod the Great, John the Baptist, and James, the brother of Jesus. Tacitus references the execution of Jesus under Pontius Pilate, affirming the Gospel narratives. Pliny the Younger, in his letters, mentions early Christians and their practices, providing external confirmation of the rapid spread of Christianity.

Moreover, the works of these historians offer context and background that illuminate the cultural and political environments in which biblical events occurred. Herodotus and Xenophon provide insights into the Persian Empire, which played a significant role in the post-exilic period of Jewish history. The writings of Greek and Roman historians on Egypt, Assyria, and Babylon help to fill in gaps and confirm details about the ancient Near Eastern empires mentioned in the Old Testament.

Conclusion

In summary, the writings of classical historians are invaluable for understanding the historical context of the Bible. Their accounts provide external corroboration of biblical events and figures, enhancing the credibility of the biblical narrative. By studying these historians, we gain a richer, more nuanced understanding of the ancient world and the historical foundations of our faith. This is why I am posting about these ancient secular historians—to highlight their role in affirming and enriching our understanding of biblical history. In addition, when we publish articles on people, places, and events in the Bible and quote a corroborating source, we link our source article so the reader can get to know who these people were better.

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).