The scene was tense. A crowd on the brink of violence had just been calmed. Moments before, they were ready to attack the apostle Paul, also known as Saul of Tarsus. Rescued by Roman soldiers, Paul now stood before the crowd, poised on a staircase near Jerusalem’s temple.

With a gesture for quiet, Paul spoke in Hebrew, introducing his defense with a notable credential: “Men, brothers, and fathers, listen now to my defense before you. … I am a Jew, born in Tarsus of Cilicia but brought up in this city, educated under Gamaliel in the strict manner of our ancestral law, zealous for God just as all of you are today.”—Acts 22:1-3.

In this precarious moment, why did Paul choose to highlight his education under Gamaliel? Who was this Gamaliel, and what did his tutelage entail? How did this background shape Saul, even after his transformation into the Christian apostle Paul?

Identifying Gamaliel

Gamaliel stood out as a prominent Pharisee, revered in his time. He was the grandson of Hillel the Elder, founder of one of Pharisaic Judaism’s two principal schools of thought. Hillel was known for his comparatively lenient interpretations, unlike his contemporary, Shammai. Following the 70 C.E. destruction of Jerusalem’s temple, Hillel’s philosophies, represented by Bet Hillel (the House of Hillel), gained precedence over Bet Shammai (the House of Shammai). As other Jewish sects faded away with the temple, Bet Hillel’s views became foundational to Judaism’s evolution, significantly shaping the Mishnah, which later informed the Talmud. Gamaliel’s contributions were critical in securing Bet Hillel’s influential position.

So respected was Gamaliel that he earned the title “rabban,” surpassing the honorific “rabbi.” His reputation was such that the Mishnah lamented upon his passing, stating: “With the death of Rabban Gamaliel the elder, the splendor of the Torah faded, and purity and sanctity vanished.”—Sotah 9:15. This acknowledgment underscores Gamaliel’s profound impact on Jewish thought and practice, marking him as a pivotal figure in the religion’s history.

Learning Under Gamaliel: Paul’s Rigorous Education

When Apostle Paul informed the Jerusalem crowd that he was “educated at the feet of Gamaliel,” he was revealing a significant aspect of his background. But what exactly did being a disciple of someone like Gamaliel entail?

The Master-Disciple Dynamic

Professor Dov Zlotnick of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America offers insight into the traditional Jewish educational system. He emphasizes the crucial role of the master-disciple relationship in the transmission of oral law, highlighting the master’s meticulousness in teaching and the disciple’s eagerness in learning. Disciples were encouraged to “sit at the feet of the scholars… ‘and drink their words with thirst.’” This phrase underscores the depth of commitment and the intensity of study required in this learning process.

Educational Practices of the First-Century Rabbis

Emil Schürer, in his work A History of the Jewish People in the Time of Jesus Christ, elaborates on the educational methods of first-century rabbinic teachers. He notes that prominent Rabbis would gather large groups of young students eager for instruction in the intricate and extensive “oral law.” The educational approach relied heavily on relentless memorization and interactive teaching, where legal questions were posed for discussion, and students were encouraged to both respond to these questions and present their inquiries to the teacher.

The High Stakes for Students

The rabbis placed immense importance on the retention of learned material, warning students that forgetting even a single piece of knowledge could be as grave as endangering their lives. The highest accolade was reserved for the student who retained everything he learned, likened to “a plastered well, which does not lose a drop of water.” This metaphor highlights the expectation of complete retention and the value placed on unwavering recollection.

Paul’s Intensive Study

This rigorous and immersive educational experience was what Paul, known then as Saul of Tarsus, underwent as a disciple of Gamaliel. It wasn’t just about acquiring knowledge; it was a profound commitment to absorbing, retaining, and applying the teachings of the Torah and the oral law, under the guidance of one of the most respected teachers of the time.

Gamaliel’s Philosophical Approach to Teaching

Gamaliel, a distinguished Pharisee, was known for his emphasis on oral law, prioritizing rabbinic traditions over direct scriptural interpretation (Matthew 15:3-9). He advocated for seeking guidance from a rabbi rather than relying on personal judgment or conscience when faced with decisions not explicitly addressed by the Hebrew Scriptures. This, he argued, was the only way to avoid sinning, highlighting a significant departure from individual discernment (compare Romans 14:1-12).

Despite his firm stance on adherence to oral tradition, Gamaliel exhibited a remarkably tolerant and progressive attitude in his legal rulings, especially in matters concerning women’s rights. He made notable allowances, such as permitting a wife to remarry based on the testimony of a single witness to her husband’s death (Yevamot 16:7, the Mishnah), and introducing protective measures for divorcées through restrictions on the issuance of a letter of divorce.

Gamaliel’s Influence on Early Christianity

This lenient and liberal mindset was evident in Gamaliel’s response to the early Christian movement. As recounted in Acts 5:34-40, during a critical moment when the apostles faced potential execution for their preaching, Gamaliel stood before the Sanhedrin and advocated for a cautious approach. He advised his fellow leaders to refrain from taking action against the apostles, suggesting that if their work was of human origin, it would fail, but if it was from God, they would not be able to stop it and would find themselves opposing divine will. His counsel was persuasive, leading to the apostles’ release and demonstrating a level of open-mindedness and prudence rare among his contemporaries.

Paul’s Transformation from Gamaliel’s Disciple to Christ’s Apostle

Paul’s background as a student under Gamaliel, one of the most esteemed rabbinic leaders of the first century C.E., undeniably granted him a moment of heightened attention when he addressed the Jerusalem crowd. However, Paul chose to speak of a teacher far beyond the renown of Gamaliel—Jesus Christ, the Messiah. It was under the tutelage of Jesus, rather than Gamaliel, that Paul stood before them (Acts 22:4-21).

The Impact of Gamaliel’s Instruction on Paul’s Christian Ministry

While Gamaliel’s rigorous training in Scriptures and Jewish law likely served Paul well in his apostolic duties, Paul’s writings, divinely inspired and integral to the Bible, starkly contrast with the core teachings of Pharisaism as espoused by Gamaliel. Paul consistently redirected his audience, whether Jewish or gentile, away from Judaic rabbis and human traditions, and towards Jesus Christ (Romans 10:1-4).

Had Paul remained a follower of Gamaliel, his path could have led to significant stature within Judaism. Gamaliel’s lineage continued to play pivotal roles in the shaping of Judaism, from his son Simeon’s involvement in the revolt against Rome to his grandson Gamaliel II’s efforts to reestablish the Sanhedrin’s authority, and further to his great-grandson Judah Ha-Nasi’s compilation of the Mishnah—a cornerstone of Jewish theology.

However, Paul regarded his potential career and prestige in Judaism as loss for the sake of Christ (Philippians 3:7, 8). His decision to follow Christ, abandoning his Pharisaic future, echoes Gamaliel’s own caution against opposing divine will. By ending his persecution of Christians and becoming an ardent follower of Jesus, Paul aligned himself with God’s purpose, becoming one of “God’s fellow workers” (1 Corinthians 3:9).

Today, many of Jehovah’s Witnesses emulate Paul’s example, prioritizing spiritual goals over secular careers to participate more fully in Kingdom preaching. Their joy and fulfillment in this divine calling mirror Paul’s own transformation and dedication, showcasing a life path chosen in harmony with God’s will over the traditions and accolades of men.

The Historical and Archaeological Evidence

Currently, there isn’t direct secular evidence specifically verifying Gamaliel’s historical existence outside of religious texts. While Gamaliel is prominently featured in the New Testament and Jewish rabbinic literature, his presence in non-religious historical records is not clearly documented. This doesn’t undermine his historical significance or the impact of his teachings, as religious texts are valuable historical documents in their own right, contributing to our understanding of historical figures and their roles in society.

Flavius Josephus, the first-century Romano-Jewish scholar, historian, and hagiographer, does not specifically refer to Gamaliel in his works. Josephus’ historical accounts, including “The Antiquities of the Jews” and “The Jewish War,” provide detailed narratives about many figures and events from Jewish history, but Gamaliel is not directly mentioned. This absence does not diminish Gamaliel’s historical or religious significance, as his contributions and teachings are well-documented within the New Testament and rabbinic literature.

Gamaliel is mentioned in several Jewish writings, notably in the Mishnah and the Talmud. These texts highlight his wisdom, his moderate interpretation of Jewish law, and his respected status as a Pharisee teacher. His teachings and legal decisions are often cited, reflecting his significant influence on Jewish tradition and law. Gamaliel’s approach is characterized by a balance between strict adherence to the law and compassion towards individuals, which has contributed to his lasting legacy within Rabbinic Judaism.

The Alleged Gospel of Gamaliel

The “Gospel of Gamaliel” is mentioned in the context of Pilate literature, a genre of apocryphal writings focusing on Pontius Pilate’s interactions with Jesus Christ. Scholars like Paulin Ladeuze and Carl Anton Baumstark have explored various apocryphal texts, including those related to Pilate, for their historical and theological insights. This particular gospel is suggested to offer details about Pilate’s life, his encounters with Jesus, and possibly the aftermath of the crucifixion. However, it’s not widely accepted or considered legitimate by mainstream scholarship due to its late emergence, lack of early manuscript evidence, and absence from the canon of early Christian writings. These factors, among others, lead to skepticism about its authenticity and historical reliability.

There are more detailed reasons why the “Gospel of Gamaliel” is not considered legitimate by scholars. Beyond the points already mentioned, additional reasons for skepticism include its narrative and theological discrepancies with canonical texts, its alignment with later Christian doctrine rather than first-century beliefs, and the absence of references to it by early Church Fathers, which would be expected if it were of genuine apostolic origin. These factors contribute to the consensus that it lacks the historical authenticity and apostolic authorship necessary for inclusion in the recognized body of New Testament writings.

About the Author

SCROLL THROUGH THE DIFFERENT CATEGORIES BELOW

BIBLE TRANSLATION AND TEXTUAL CRITICISM

BIBLE TRANSLATION AND TEXTUAL CRITICISM

BIBLICAL STUDIES / BIBLE BACKGROUND / HISTORY OF THE BIBLE/ INTERPRETATION

EARLY CHRISTIANITY

HISTORY OF CHRISTIANITY

CHRISTIAN APOLOGETIC EVANGELISM

TECHNOLOGY AND THE CHRISTIAN

CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY

CHRISTIAN DEVOTIONALS

CHRISTIAN FICTION