2 Samuel 21:7-9 Updated American Standard Version (UASV)

⁷ But the king spared Mephibosheth, the son of Jonathan the son of Saul, because of Jehovah’s oath that was between them, between David and Jonathan the son of Saul. ⁸ But the king took the two sons of Rizpah the daughter of Aiah, whom she bore to Saul, Armoni and Mephibosheth; and the five sons of Michal[143] the daughter of Saul, whom she bore to Adriel the son of Barzillai the Meholathite; ⁹ and he delivered them into the hands of the Gibeonites, and they hanged them in the mountain before Jehovah, and they fell all seven together. And they were put to death in the days of harvest, in the first days, at the beginning of barley harvest.

2 Samuel 21:7-9 describes an event in which King David is seeking to end a famine in the land by making a deal with the Gibeonites, a non-Israelite people who had made a treaty with Israel in the past. In the passage, it is said that the Gibeonites tell David that the famine will not end until seven of Saul’s descendants are handed over to them to be put to death as punishment for Saul’s past offenses against them.

This passage is significant in several ways. Firstly, it highlights the principle of collective guilt in ancient Israel. Saul, who had persecuted the Gibeonites, and his descendants are held accountable for his actions and are punished for the wrongs he committed against them. Secondly, this passage also illustrates the role of human mediation in the process of seeking atonement or forgiveness. The Gibeonites required satisfaction for Saul’s transgression, and David had to act as a mediator to placate them. Finally, it also points out to the seriousness of fulfilling agreements and treaties made in ancient times, both between nations as well as between God and His people.

It is worth noting that this passage is a historical account and not a moral or theological statement on the justice or morality of the actions described in it. These actions should be understood within the context of ancient near-eastern cultural norms.

Bible Difficulty

This passage describes how King David handed over the sons of Saul, including Mephibosheth, to the Gibeonites for execution. This action appears to be in direct conflict with the earlier statement that David “showed compassion for Mephibosheth” as he spared his life.

One possible explanation for this discrepancy is that David had made a pledge or oath to the Gibeonites, who were demanding that he hand over the sons of Saul to them as punishment for Saul’s previous persecution of their people. In order to fulfill this oath, David handed over the sons of Saul, including Mephibosheth, to the Gibeonites, despite his personal feelings of compassion towards Mephibosheth.

It’s also possible that David had to balance his personal compassion with the greater good of his kingdom. There may have been a situation where the Gibeonites were causing disturbance to his kingdom, and this action pacified them and maintained peace in his kingdom.

It should also be noted that there are two different individuals named Mephibosheth in the story of 2 Samuel 21. The account does indeed involve King Saul’s son and grandson, both of whom were named Mephibosheth. More on this below.

The account describes how King Saul had broken the covenant of peace that was made with the Gibeonites, and his actions resulted in the deaths of many of the Gibeonites. When David became king, the surviving Gibeonites approached him and asked for atonement for the wrongs committed by King Saul. David granted their request and handed over seven descendants of Saul, including two sons of Saul, one of whom was named Mephibosheth.

It’s also important to keep in mind that David acts in accordance with the law and the commandments of God, which stated that blood guilt required atonement and the guilty should be punished. The passage helps us understand the background context and the purpose of David’s actions, as well as the legal and moral reasoning behind them.

It’s important to keep in mind that this event is described within the narrative of the Bible, which is a complex work written over centuries, and sometimes its intention is not clear or might have multiple possible interpretations. 

CLEARING UP ANY CONFUSION

The information provided above, the distinction between two individuals named Mephibosheth in the context of 2 Samuel 21:7-9 and related passages, is biblically accurate and clarifies a common point of confusion. Let’s evaluate the key points for accuracy and biblical alignment:

Distinction Between Two Mephibosheths

The article correctly identifies two different individuals named Mephibosheth: one, the son of Jonathan, Saul’s son, and the other, the son of Saul through his concubine Rizpah. This distinction is crucial for understanding the actions taken by David in response to the Gibeonites’ request for justice.

Biblical Covenant and Compassion

David’s compassion for Jonathan’s son, Mephibosheth, is well-documented and stems from his covenant with Jonathan (1 Samuel 18:1; 20:42). This covenant led David to show kindness to Jonathan’s descendants, specifically mentioned in 2 Samuel 9 in the case of Mephibosheth, Jonathan’s son, who was spared from the retribution against Saul’s house.

Execution of Saul’s Descendants

The first half of the article above accurately recounts how David handed over two of Saul’s sons and five grandsons to the Gibeonites, fulfilling their request for justice due to Saul’s breach of the covenant with the Gibeonites (Joshua 9:3-27). The inclusion of a Mephibosheth among those handed over refers to Saul’s son, not Jonathan’s, aligning with the biblical record.

Biblical Law and Individual Responsibility

The reflection on Deuteronomy 24:16 underscores the principle that individuals are responsible for their own sins, suggesting that those who were executed had some participation in Saul’s actions against the Gibeonites. This interpretation aligns with the biblical principle of individual accountability before God.

Conclusion and Moral Lessons

The above draws lessons about personal responsibility and the consequences of actions, consistent with biblical teachings. It emphasizes that following orders does not absolve one of moral responsibility, a principle reflected throughout Scripture.

In summary, the article’s explanation regarding the different Mephibosheths and the events surrounding the Gibeonites’ request for justice is biblically sound. It provides a clear understanding of a complex narrative by distinguishing between individuals with the same name and highlighting the biblical principles at play. This account not only clarifies a historical event but also offers insights into the themes of justice, mercy, and individual responsibility that permeate the biblical text.

About the Author

SCROLL THROUGH THE DIFFERENT CATEGORIES BELOW

BIBLE TRANSLATION AND TEXTUAL CRITICISM

BIBLICAL STUDIES / INTERPRETATION

EARLY CHRISTIANITY

CHRISTIAN APOLOGETIC EVANGELISM

TECHNOLOGY AND THE CHRISTIAN

CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY

CHRISTIAN DEVOTIONALS

CHRISTIAN FICTION