Please Help Us Keep These Thousands of Blog Posts Growing and Free for All

$5.00

The Historical Background and Doctrinal Claims

In early Christian history, disputes arose regarding the proper authority and teaching office within the church. One such contention is the doctrine known as papal infallibility—the claim that the Bishop of Rome, under certain conditions, is preserved from error when pronouncing official doctrine on matters of faith and morals. It is maintained that such declarations, made ex cathedra, are divinely protected. However, when we examine the foundation of Christian teaching as revealed in Scripture, it becomes clear that no biblical evidence supports the notion that any human leader, including the Bishop of Rome, has been granted infallibility. The Bible, the sole and inerrant Word of God, consistently teaches that ultimate authority rests in Jehovah and in Jesus Christ, the head of the church. “For in him the whole fullness of deity dwells bodily” (Colossians 2:9, ASV) and “Christ is the head of the church” (Ephesians 5:23, ASV). These declarations stand in stark contrast to the later claim that any human office possesses an unerring capacity to define doctrine.

The claim of papal infallibility emerged from historical developments that occurred long after the apostolic era. Early church leaders and councils, as recorded in the New Testament, exercised a collegial form of leadership. The decision-making processes were carried out collectively, as seen in the Jerusalem Council around 49 C.E. (Acts 15:6–29). In this council, the apostles and elders deliberated together on the requirements for Gentile believers. At no point does the New Testament provide a basis for any single apostle to assume a position of supreme and exclusive doctrinal authority that would later be interpreted as infallibility.

Scriptural Authority Versus Human Tradition

The foundation of Christian faith is the inspired Word of Jehovah, which is without error. “Your word is a lamp unto my feet and a light unto my path” (Psalm 119:105, ASV) emphasizes that Scripture itself is the ultimate guide in all matters of truth. The doctrine of papal infallibility, as understood in later ecclesiastical history, is not derived from Scripture but from human interpretation and later ecclesiastical tradition. There is no passage in the Bible that explicitly grants any human leader, including the apostle Peter, the unique power to render doctrinal decisions free from error. In fact, the Bible repeatedly warns believers against placing undue authority in any human teacher apart from the clear revelation of Jehovah’s Word.

For example, in 1 Corinthians 4:15, the apostle Paul states, “For even if you had ten thousand guardians in Christ, you do not have many fathers; for in Christ Jesus I became your father through the gospel.” This passage underlines that no matter how many leaders may minister the gospel, they are not to be considered the ultimate source of truth. It is Jesus Christ alone who holds the supreme authority. Furthermore, in Acts 15, during the deliberations concerning Gentile believers, the collective decision of the apostles and elders stands as the guiding principle for the church’s practice, rather than the pronouncements of a single leader.

The Role of Peter in the New Testament

One of the central points of contention is the role of Peter, often cited in discussions concerning papal primacy. Jesus’ statement in Matthew 16:18, “I say to you: That you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it” (ASV), has been interpreted by some to confer upon Peter a unique and unerring authority. However, a careful examination of Scripture reveals that Jesus’ intent was not to elevate Peter to a position of infallibility, but to emphasize that the foundation of the church is Christ himself, who is the true cornerstone. Peter later explains in 1 Peter 2:4–8, “As you come to him, a living stone, rejected indeed by men, but chosen by God… in him you also are being built up into a spiritual house, to be a holy priesthood.” Here, Peter clearly acknowledges that it is Christ, not himself, who is the foundation. The church is built on the rock that is Jesus Christ, and not on any human leader.

Moreover, the New Testament reveals that Peter himself was subject to error. In his own epistle, Peter encourages believers to exercise discernment regarding prophetic messages and false teachings (2 Peter 2:1–3, ASV). The presence of warnings against false prophets and erroneous doctrines confirms that no human, including Peter, is immune from error. The biblical record does not support the idea that any apostle or subsequent church leader has been endowed with infallibility.

The Early Church and Collective Leadership

The leadership model established in the New Testament was characterized by mutual accountability and collective decision-making. The Jerusalem Council, convened to address the question of Gentile believers and the observance of the Mosaic Law, exemplifies this principle. Acts 15 records a series of discussions among the apostles and elders, culminating in a letter that laid out essential guidelines for Gentile Christians. This process was not centralized in one individual but was the result of a collaborative effort by the early church. Such a structure stands in opposition to later claims of a single leader whose pronouncements are beyond reproach.

The apostle Paul, in his letters, reinforces the concept that the church’s authority is grounded in the truth of the gospel rather than in any human institution or office. He writes in Galatians 2:9, “James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, extended to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship, so that we should go to the Gentiles and they to the circumcision” (ASV). This statement affirms that even among the key leaders of the early church, there was an understanding of shared authority and mutual respect, rather than an exclusive claim to infallibility by any one individual.

The Biblical Standard for Inerrancy

For the conservative evangelical, the inerrancy of Scripture is paramount. Jehovah’s Word is the only infallible standard of truth, and no human institution or tradition can supplant it. “All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness” (2 Timothy 3:16, ASV). This foundational truth means that any doctrine not found explicitly in Scripture, including the claim of papal infallibility, must be viewed with skepticism. The truth of the gospel is complete and sufficient; it does not require the addition of extrabiblical doctrines that elevate human authority above the Word of God.

The Bible consistently teaches that true wisdom and understanding come from studying Jehovah’s revelation rather than relying on human tradition. Proverbs 3:5–6 admonishes, “Trust in Jehovah with all your heart, and lean not on your own understanding; In all your ways acknowledge him, and he shall make your paths straight” (ASV). This call to trust in Jehovah alone underscores that the ultimate source of wisdom is not any human leader but the Creator Himself.

The Historical Development of Papal Infallibility

The doctrine of papal infallibility did not emerge in the New Testament but was formulated in the centuries following the apostolic era. It reached its climax during an ecumenical council held in 1870, long after the early church had already established its doctrinal foundations based on Scripture. The historical records show that even within the later centuries, there were numerous debates and controversies over the extent and nature of papal authority. Critics have noted that many early church leaders and bishops, including those well-respected for their piety and scholarship, were in disagreement about the claims of infallibility. These historical disputes highlight that the concept of an infallible human leader was a development influenced by later ecclesiastical politics rather than by the clear teaching of Jehovah’s Word.

Several notable figures in church history have pointed out that the Bible does not support the elevation of any one individual to an infallible status. The apostolic model, as demonstrated in the New Testament, is one of shared responsibility and accountability. The fact that even revered leaders, such as the apostle Paul, acknowledged their limitations and need for correction reinforces the biblical pattern. “For we all have sinned and fall short of the glory of Jehovah” (Romans 3:23, ASV) is a universal truth that applies to every human being, regardless of office or title.

Analyzing Biblical Passages on Church Authority

A thorough exegesis of key biblical passages on church authority reveals that the ultimate head of the church is Christ, not any human leader. Ephesians 2:20 declares, “being built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, with Christ Jesus himself as the chief cornerstone” (ASV). This verse affirms that the church’s foundation is the testimony of the apostles and the revelation of Jesus Christ, who is the cornerstone upon which everything rests. There is no indication that any one apostle was granted an unerring authority that would be passed down through succession.

In 1 Peter 2:4–8, Peter himself describes the church as “living stones” being built up into a spiritual house, with Jesus as the “cornerstone.” This description makes it clear that the focus of authority and salvation is not on the human builders but on the divine architect. Jesus, who is fully God and fully man, is the only one worthy of ultimate trust and obedience. No human being, no matter how revered, can claim to share in that unique, divine prerogative.

Furthermore, the New Testament emphasizes the importance of discernment and correction within the church. Paul admonished the Corinthian congregation in 1 Corinthians 5 for tolerating sin within their midst, and he urged them to adhere strictly to the truth of the gospel. “Test all things; hold fast what is good” (1 Thessalonians 5:21, ASV) is an instruction that applies to every teaching and every leader. The responsibility to test all doctrines against the clear standard of Scripture remains with every believer. This universal mandate leaves no room for any claim of infallibility by a single human office.

The Implications for Christian Apologetics

From a conservative evangelical perspective, the doctrine of papal infallibility is not only unbiblical but also detrimental to the clear witness of the gospel. When the church claims that one human leader is incapable of error, it shifts the focus away from the sufficiency of Jehovah’s Word as the ultimate source of truth. The inerrancy of Scripture is the cornerstone of our faith, and nothing can substitute for the inspired, unchanging revelation found in the Bible. “For every word of God is proven; he is a shield to those who take refuge in him” (Proverbs 30:5, ASV). This truth must remain unchallenged by human traditions that contradict the clear testimony of Scripture.

Christian apologists emphasize that our authority comes not from human institutions or ecclesiastical hierarchies but directly from Jehovah. The claim to infallibility in any human office, particularly one that evolved long after the New Testament period, undermines the central biblical teaching that Jesus Christ is the sole head of the church. Moreover, the historical evidence of mistakes, errors in judgment, and even outright heresies among various leaders in the office in question further weakens the claim. If the Bible is truly the infallible Word of Jehovah, then any doctrine that cannot be directly substantiated by Scripture must be rejected.

Evaluating the Claim in Light of Scriptural Inerrancy

A careful evaluation of the doctrine of papal infallibility reveals that it stands in direct opposition to the principle of scriptural inerrancy. Jehovah’s Word is described in Psalm 12:6, “The words of Jehovah are pure words, like silver refined in a furnace on earth, purified seven times.” This declaration attests to the absolute reliability and perfection of Scripture. If the only infallible standard is the Word of Jehovah, then any claim to a human capacity for infallibility must be rejected as contrary to biblical teaching. The claim that any human office is divinely protected from error is not only unsubstantiated by Scripture but also introduces a dangerous possibility of elevating tradition above revelation.

Furthermore, the apostolic teachings consistently point to a church that is subject to correction and accountability. The letters of the apostles frequently call on believers to remain vigilant, discerning, and ready to hold one another accountable. “Examine all things; hold fast to that which is good” (1 Thessalonians 5:21, ASV) reinforces that no doctrine or teaching, regardless of its origin, is beyond examination. Such a mandate leaves no room for an unchallengeable authority vested in any human leader.

The Centrality of Christ in Church Authority

The biblical model for church authority is unequivocally centered on Jesus Christ. In 1 Corinthians 3:11, Paul writes, “For no other foundation can anyone lay than that which is laid, which is Jesus Christ.” This passage makes it clear that Christ is the only foundation upon which the church is built. Every teaching, every practice, and every doctrinal decision must be measured against the revelation of Jesus. It is not through human office that the church is built, but through the transformative power of the gospel. Any doctrine that attempts to elevate a human leader to the status of being infallible detracts from the sole sufficiency of Christ.

In addition, the apostolic emphasis on humility and dependence on Jehovah is evident throughout the New Testament. Jesus Himself demonstrated humility in His earthly ministry and continually pointed his followers to the ultimate example of servanthood. “Whoever desires to become great among you must be your servant” (Matthew 20:26, ASV). This model of humility stands in direct opposition to any claim that a single human leader possesses a supernatural degree of authority or errorlessness.

Reassessing Historical Developments in Light of Biblical Truth

Historical developments within the church have sometimes led to doctrines that are later rejected when measured against the standard of Scripture. The doctrine of papal infallibility is one such development that arose from later ecclesiastical tradition rather than from the apostolic teaching found in the New Testament. Early church history, as recorded in the Acts of the Apostles and the letters of the apostles, reveals a pattern of shared leadership and mutual accountability. The decision-making processes of the early church were characterized by consultation and consensus, not by the unilateral declarations of an individual leader. This historical reality is fundamentally at odds with the later claim that any one office, particularly that of the Bishop of Rome, has been granted infallibility.

The historical record also documents numerous instances where leaders in that office made errors or adopted teachings that were later condemned by the broader Christian community. Such documented mistakes serve as a potent reminder that no human, regardless of position, can claim to be beyond reproach. The true infallibility lies solely in the unchanging Word of Jehovah, which remains the final authority on all matters of faith and morals.

Addressing Misconceptions and Upholding Biblical Integrity

Critics of conservative evangelical teaching sometimes argue that the doctrine of papal infallibility provides certainty and doctrinal unity. However, from a biblical perspective, certainty comes only from the clear revelation of Jehovah in Scripture. The claim that any human leader can offer such certainty is both unbiblical and dangerous. The Bible warns against placing ultimate trust in human wisdom. “Trust in Jehovah with all your heart, and lean not on your own understanding” (Proverbs 3:5, ASV) teaches that human wisdom is fallible and must always be subordinated to divine revelation.

Moreover, the insistence on papal infallibility often leads to an environment in which critical inquiry and accountability are suppressed. The healthy church is one that continually examines its teachings and holds its leaders accountable to the standard of Scripture. As the apostle Paul exhorts in 1 Thessalonians 5:21, “Examine all things; hold fast to that which is good” (ASV). This call for continual testing of all doctrines is incompatible with any claim to absolute, unchallengeable authority vested in a single human office.

The Ultimate Authority: Jehovah and His Word

The conclusion that emerges from a careful study of Scripture and church history is unmistakable: the only infallible authority in all matters of faith and morals is Jehovah’s Word. The doctrine of papal infallibility, which emerged from later church tradition, stands in stark contrast to the clear biblical teaching that Jesus Christ is the head of the church and that all authority is derived from Jehovah. “For all things are created by him and for him” (Colossians 1:16, ASV) and “Christ is the head of the church” (Ephesians 5:23, ASV) affirm that ultimate authority and infallibility reside solely in the Creator.

This understanding forms the basis for conservative evangelical apologetics. The truth of the gospel is not dependent on the pronouncements of any human institution, but on the enduring, unchanging revelation of Jehovah in the Bible. When confronted with doctrines that lack clear scriptural support, the evangelical is called to return to the Word, the only infallible guide in matters of truth. “Every word of God is proven; he is a shield to those who take refuge in him” (Psalm 12:6, ASV).

Conclusion: Embracing the True Source of Authority

A thorough examination of the doctrine of papal infallibility, when measured against the clear teaching of Scripture, reveals that it has no basis in the apostolic tradition or in the inspired Word of Jehovah. The early church operated under a system of shared leadership and mutual accountability, with Christ Himself as the sole and true head of the church. The historical development of the claim to papal infallibility is a product of later tradition and human interpretation, not of biblical revelation. As conservative evangelicals, we affirm that only Jehovah’s Word is infallible and that Jesus Christ is the foundation upon which the church is built.

In light of these truths, it becomes evident that the doctrine of papal infallibility stands in stark opposition to the biblical model of church authority. The infallibility of Scripture, as proclaimed in passages such as 2 Timothy 3:16 and Psalm 119:105, assures us that the only standard by which we must judge is the Word of Jehovah. All human traditions that claim a level of authority beyond what is clearly revealed in Scripture must be rejected in favor of the unchanging truth that has been handed down through the ages.

May every believer be encouraged to examine doctrines critically, always returning to the Bible as the ultimate and infallible guide. In a world where human wisdom is prone to error, the clear and enduring message of Jehovah’s Word remains our steadfast assurance. “For the sum of your word is truth, and every one of your righteous rules endures forever” (Psalm 119:160, ASV). In upholding this truth, we honor the Creator and secure the foundation of our faith, confident that our hope rests not in any human leader, but solely in the unerring revelation of Jehovah.

You May Also Benefit From

The Battle for the Bible Involves All Christians

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).