God’s Design for Authority in the Marriage Relationship

The biblical doctrine of subjection in marriage is a subject that elicits considerable resistance in modern Western culture, particularly due to the influence of secular feminism, liberal theology, and egalitarian social theories. Yet, Scripture is abundantly clear: the wife is to be in subjection to her husband as the husband is head over the wife. This is not a cultural opinion but a divine command grounded in creation order, Christological example, and apostolic authority. Any treatment of this subject that dismisses or distorts the meaning of the original language fails to do justice to the inspired text of Scripture.

The primary Greek term used in the New Testament for this concept is hupotassō, which, in the middle or passive voice, refers to submission, subjection, or yielding to authority. It denotes an ordered structure—not based on value, intelligence, or spiritual worth—but on God’s ordained roles. The headship of the husband and the subjection of the wife are not human innovations but reflections of divine design (1 Corinthians 11:3).

Ephesians 5:22—Grammatical Clarity and Theological Implication

Ephesians 5:22 reads in the best and most ancient Greek manuscripts as: “Wives to your own husbands as to the Lord.” The supplied verb “submit” or “be subject” is carried over from verse 21, where Paul commands all believers to be “subject to one another in the fear of Christ.” The Greek verb ὑποτάσσω (hupotassō) is a military term meaning to arrange under or to subordinate. In this context, it conveys that wives are to willingly subordinate themselves under the loving authority of their own husbands—not under all men, but specifically their husbands—as to the Lord. This phrase does not make the husband equal to Christ in authority; rather, it expresses that the wife’s subjection is ultimately an act of submission to Christ.

The textual issue surrounding Ephesians 5:22, where early manuscripts lack the verb and rely on its presence in verse 21, actually strengthens the case that Paul’s intention was to subordinate this command directly under the overarching theme of order and reverence. The passage continues in verse 23: “For the husband is the head of the wife, as Christ also is the head of the church.” The term kephalē (head) does not mean “source,” as some egalitarians argue, but rather one who holds authority and governance. Paul makes no cultural excuses or temporary accommodations; the authority of the husband is rooted in the relationship between Christ and His church.

The Role of the Husband: Headship, Not Harshness

Ephesians 5 does not present the husband’s authority in isolation. Rather, verses 25–33 issue solemn responsibilities to husbands: “Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ also loved the church and gave Himself up for her.” The pattern is sacrificial leadership, not authoritarianism. The love of Christ is not passive or self-serving; it is initiating, protecting, and sanctifying.

A husband must not exercise his headship with cold detachment or emotional neglect. Nor must he wield authority to dominate or suppress. Rather, his leadership should reflect the self-denying love of Christ. He must seek his wife’s spiritual and emotional well-being, lead the home in prayer and Scripture, and make decisions that reflect godly wisdom, not personal ego.

Yet the Scripture is equally clear: the husband is not called to co-leadership or shared headship. Headship resides with the man. He has the final decision-making authority, and the wife is to follow his lead—unless his instruction directly contradicts God’s Word.

1 Peter 3:1–2—Subjection That Evangelizes

The apostle Peter commands: “In the same way, you wives, be submissive to your own husbands so that even if any of them are disobedient to the word, they may be won without a word by the behavior of their wives.” Again, the Greek hupotassō is used, affirming the consistency of New Testament teaching.

Here, Peter addresses a difficult case: a believing wife married to an unbelieving or disobedient husband. The Spirit-inspired instruction is not to revolt, nag, or separate, but to exemplify godliness. The wife’s submissive demeanor, coupled with “chaste and respectful behavior,” becomes a powerful testimony. The subjection is not one of silence in abuse or passive resignation but of deliberate, faithful obedience to God’s design, which may become a means of salvation or sanctification for the husband.

Colossians 3:18—Fitting in the Lord

Colossians 3:18 instructs: “Wives, be in subjection to your husbands, as is fitting in the Lord.” Again, the verb hupotassō is employed. Paul here presents submission not as an optional Christian virtue, but as a fitting outworking of one’s position in Christ. The phrase “as is fitting in the Lord” makes clear that submission is a divinely ordained function of the wife’s walk with Christ. It is fitting because it reflects the order God has established.

This passage also reaffirms the limitations of submission. It is not blind or absolute. Should a husband ask or command something contrary to Scripture, the wife must obey God rather than man (Acts 5:29).

Titus 2:5—Protecting the Honor of God’s Word

Paul charges older women to train younger women to be “submissive to their own husbands, that the word of God may not be spoken of abusively.” Once more, the Greek hupotassō is used. The failure to follow God’s design for the home brings reproach to Scripture. When Christian women reject submission, they not only reject their role—they cast aspersions on the character of God and the authority of His Word. The reversal of roles, so common in today’s culture, is not progress but rebellion.

The inclusion of this principle in Titus—alongside commands to be self-controlled, pure, and hardworking at home—demonstrates that submission is not peripheral but central to biblical womanhood.

1 Corinthians 11:3—The Divine Hierarchy

Paul teaches, “I want you to understand that the head of every man is Christ, the head of a woman is the man, and the head of Christ is God.” This is not merely about social arrangement but theological order. The headship of the man over the woman in marriage is likened to the headship of Christ over the man and even of God the Father over Christ.

This chain of authority does not imply inferiority. Christ is not inferior to the Father in nature, but He willingly submits to the Father’s will (John 6:38). In the same way, a wife is not inferior to her husband but submits out of reverence for God’s order.

Subjection Is Relative, Not Absolute

The husband’s authority is not unrestricted. It is bounded by the moral law of God and the purpose of his headship—to serve, sanctify, and steward his wife and family. If a husband commands something sinful, the wife must obey God above him. Like civil authorities (Romans 13), marital authority is legitimate only insofar as it aligns with divine mandates.

Still, within the God-ordained framework, the wife’s subjection is to be willing, consistent, and rooted in a desire to honor the Lord. Her obedience is not merely to her husband—it is first and foremost obedience to God.

Conclusion: Honor the Order God Has Designed

In a world that despises authority and reverses roles, Christian wives are called to live counter-culturally by embracing biblical subjection in marriage. This is not bondage but blessing. It is not oppression but order. When the wife willingly submits to her husband as unto the Lord, and the husband sacrificially loves and leads his wife as Christ does the church, the result is a marriage that glorifies God and models the Gospel.

Subjection in marriage, rightly understood and biblically practiced, is not degrading—it is dignifying. It reflects the eternal wisdom of God and displays the beauty of His created order. It fosters peace in the home, cultivates sanctification, and manifests the transformative power of obedience to Scripture.

You May Also Enjoy

What Practical Counsel Does the Bible Offer on Sexual Relationships?

About the Author