The question of whether Moses truly wrote the Pentateuch has profound implications for the integrity and reliability of the rest of Scripture. Many theologians, historians, and faithful readers of the Bible throughout the centuries have embraced the traditional view that these five books—Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy—trace their origin to Moses. Although a wave of critical scholarship spanning more than two centuries has challenged this belief, the scriptural and historical evidence stands firm. In a period when academic voices sometimes overshadow ancient testimony, the conservative approach to Scripture holds that the Pentateuch indeed reflects the authorship by Moses in the late 16th century B.C.E. This view has been passed down among faithful readers of the Hebrew Scriptures and is grounded in an understanding of ancient literary customs, archaeological discoveries, and historical circumstances that surround the formation of these sacred texts.

The aim here is to examine how the biblical text has reached our day, to explore archaeological and textual evidence that upholds the authorship by Moses, and to consider why so much doubt entered the scholarly world. This investigation will also address how the Hebrew text was safeguarded over time. Exodus 17:14 records Jehovah’s words to Moses: “Write this as a memorial in the book.” Such passages point to the unmistakable idea that Moses had the commission, capacity, and divine directive to record the earliest biblical narratives and laws. The question thus arises: On what basis do we maintain trust in such explicit claims?

The Setting and Timeframe of Moses

Moses lived during a period when writing was highly developed in the ancient Near East. Scriptural chronology places his birth roughly in the late 16th century B.C.E., well after the introduction of cuneiform and hieroglyphics. The biblical account in Exodus 2:1–10 shows Moses being adopted into Pharaoh’s court, an environment where literacy was prized. The educational system of Egypt included scribal instruction, and Moses would have had every opportunity to become adept in reading and writing. Acts 7:22 affirms that Moses “was instructed in all the wisdom of the Egyptians.” Nothing in the Pentateuch suggests the author lacked first-hand familiarity with Egyptian culture. Exodus 7:19–21 describes details that reflect an insider’s view of the plagues in Egypt, consistent with someone who had deep knowledge of the land.

The Pentateuch’s historical context locates Moses at a pivotal moment. Between the oppression of Israel in Egypt (Exodus 1:8–14) and the Exodus in about 1446 B.C.E., Moses underwent experiences that shaped his leadership and prepared him to receive divine revelation. By the time he led the Israelites out of bondage, he was more than capable of writing laws, genealogies, and historical narratives. The earliest believers in Scripture understood this continuity of events as strong confirmation that Moses indeed stood at the source. Deuteronomy 31:9 notes, “Moses wrote this law and gave it to the priests,” reinforcing the premise that these writings originated from his own hand or at his authoritative direction.

Historical Transmission of the Hebrew Text

The transmission of the Hebrew Scriptures has been remarkably consistent through the centuries. This consistency supports the claim that the Pentateuch’s foundational text, established in Moses’ era, was safeguarded as generations passed. Deuteronomy 31:24 states, “It came about, when Moses finished writing the words of this law in a book until they were complete,” highlighting that the Pentateuch was circulated among the people of Israel and entrusted to the priestly class.

Archaeological discoveries help confirm the antiquity and reliability of the Hebrew text. The Dead Sea Scrolls, found beginning in 1947, include fragments of nearly every book of the Hebrew Bible, including sections of the Pentateuch. Many of these scrolls date to before 70 C.E. The Cairo Geniza, discovered in the late 19th century, yielded tens of thousands of Hebrew manuscripts that corroborate the consonantal text shared by the Masoretic tradition. Although textual variations occur, the differences are generally minor. Such consistency is extraordinary for an ancient text. The Masoretic scribes of the 6th to 10th centuries C.E. diligently preserved this consonantal text, adding vocalization marks to maintain correct pronunciation and meaning without altering the consonants they had inherited. These careful steps, and the fact that older manuscripts closely match the Masoretic text, illustrate that the Pentateuch as we know it echoes a very ancient, authoritative source.

That source, revered from Joshua’s time onward (Joshua 1:8), was commonly understood to be Moses’ written legacy. The notion that Moses set down the main body of these five books is thus not merely a theological claim; it rests on manuscripts, versions, quotations, and an unbroken tradition that predates even the earliest extant codices. Observations derived from textual criticism reinforce this cohesion. When textual variants do appear, they rarely challenge the fundamental structure or authorship of the Pentateuch. Instead, they demonstrate the care scribes took in copying the text, even while occasionally making minor errors of transcription.

Early Challenges to the Authorship by Moses

In more recent centuries, a line of thought has contended that Moses could not have authored the Pentateuch, largely based on theories of literary analysis. Certain critics in the 19th and 20th centuries posited that the text must be a composite derived from separate sources—commonly referred to by letters such as J, E, D, and P—patched together by editors who lived long after Moses. These theories often hinge on the observation that the Pentateuch sometimes refers to the Almighty as “Elohim” and at other times as “Jehovah.” Critics proposed that different authoring communities existed: one that preferred the name “Jehovah” and one that preferred “Elohim,” with later redactors merging the narratives into a single text.

Such arguments collapse under closer inspection. The early textual witnesses do not display a rigid consistency in the usage of “Jehovah” and “Elohim.” Instead, the variation of divine names can frequently be traced to synonyms or scribal tradition. Scripture itself acknowledges that “Jehovah” is the unique personal name of God (Exodus 3:15). “Elohim” is more generic, signifying “God.” The normal interplay of name and title in the ancient Hebrew context thus accounts for their appearance in different passages. “Jehovah” was the personal name, “Elohim” was a reference to divinity, and “Jehovah Elohim” referred to the Almighty in a combined manner that underscored both identity and sovereignty.

Some have also argued that the sacrificial system presented in the Pentateuch must stem from a later age, supposing it shows advanced priestly concepts. However, the biblical text reveals that public worship under the Law covenant included an elaborate priestly structure from the start (Exodus 28:1–4; Leviticus 8:1–12). This system, rather than being the product of evolving religious complexity, was instituted soon after the Exodus. Exodus 19:5–6 indicates that Israel’s unique position as a “kingdom of priests” took shape early in their wilderness experience. Archaeological and textual studies consistently confirm the antiquity of these legal and ceremonial customs, aligning well with the setting of Moses. No historical necessity compels us to assume a later date for such a well-developed priestly system.

The Role of Ancient Scribal Practices

Critics have sometimes relied too heavily on modern ideas about authorship. In the ancient Near East, authorship did not necessarily mean that the writer personally penned every single line without assistance. It often meant that the originator established the content, oversaw the composition, and took responsibility for its dissemination. Moses, as the unquestioned leader of Israel, was in a position to oversee the creation of Israel’s primary code of laws, which included regulations for worship, civil conduct, and moral behavior (Exodus 20:1–17; 24:3–8). Deuteronomy 31:9 presents the image of Moses handing the Law to the priests for safekeeping and public reading. While occasional editorial remarks might have been added later, the substance fundamentally comes from Moses’ lifetime.

When we consider the fluidity of textual composition in ancient contexts, it is not surprising that certain small additions, such as the account of Moses’ death in Deuteronomy 34:5–12, were appended by divinely guided scribes who wished to complete the narrative. Yet the structure, commandments, and essential storyline bear the hallmark of an eyewitness who possessed firsthand knowledge of Egypt, Canaan’s geography, and wilderness conditions (Exodus 16:1–3).

Archeological Corroboration for an Early Date

Excavations over the past century and a half have unearthed evidence that writing and codification of laws were common during the period Moses would have lived. The Code of Hammurabi, dating to around the 18th century B.C.E., is a prime illustration. This discovery substantiates the practice of recording extensive law codes on stone or clay, centuries before Moses. The numerous clay tablets discovered at sites such as Mari and Nuzi also reveal wide literary activity. Moses’ composition of a comprehensive law code for Israel thus fits well with the realities of that era.

The biblical text itself resonates with an Egyptian setting, especially in the narratives of Genesis and Exodus. The mention of Egyptian customs, names, and geographical realities in the Pentateuch lines up with what is known about the Nile region in the 16th–15th centuries B.C.E. Critics who dated the text to a much later time often overlooked these Egyptian details or tried to assign them to redactors. However, the presence of Egyptian words and references in the earliest parts of Exodus suggests that the author was intimately familiar with the place and culture. Exodus 1:11 describes the building of storehouse cities, Pithom and Raamses, aligning with extrabiblical evidence for Egyptian construction projects in that region. This convergence of biblical and archaeological information strongly indicates composition during or soon after the events described.

Variations in Divine Names

The interplay of “Jehovah” and “Elohim” is frequently cited as proof of multiple authors. Yet these two terms often appear side by side or interchangeably throughout the Pentateuch without signaling distinct sources. Genesis 2:4–5 says, “In the day that Jehovah God made the earth and the heavens, no shrub of the field was yet in the earth.” This joint usage conveys meaning about God’s character and function. The same dynamic occurs in everyday language: a person might say “the President” or “President Smith,” fully recognizing it refers to the same individual. Ancient manuscripts, including the Septuagint and the Samaritan Pentateuch, sometimes preserve alternate readings, such as “God” where the Hebrew text has “Jehovah” or “Jehovah God.” These variations are not evidence of different authors, but instead reflect synonyms or scribal practices. Scholars focused on objective study of the text point out that many textual variants originated from copying or from attempts to clarify the text for readers unfamiliar with Hebrew names.

Literary Themes and Unity of the Pentateuch

The Pentateuch displays a narrative unity that reinforces Moses’ authorship. From Genesis’ account of humanity’s origins, the flood, and the patriarchs, the story flows into Exodus’ record of bondage in Egypt, deliverance, and covenant formation at Mount Sinai. Leviticus provides detailed regulations for holiness and worship. Numbers recounts Israel’s time in the wilderness and further instructions. Deuteronomy repeats and expands on the Law for a new generation poised to enter Canaan.

If the Pentateuch were pieced together from separate sources composed over centuries, we would expect extensive contradictions in chronology, theology, and style. Instead, the storyline maintains coherence from the call of Abraham (Genesis 12:1–3) to the plains of Moab, where Moses addresses the Israelites in Deuteronomy. There is no persistent clash in theology or moral teachings. Genesis 15:13–16 indicates that Jehovah foretold to Abraham the bondage and subsequent deliverance of his offspring. Exodus shows the fulfillment of these promises. The progression is consistent with the viewpoint of a single main author or a carefully supervised composition rather than a haphazard patchwork of unrelated documents.

Addressing Alleged Discrepancies

Certain textual issues once labeled discrepancies by critics vanish when contextual and textual details come to light. For instance, Exodus 18:6–7 has been cited by some as contradictory, where Jethro is said to speak to Moses before they meet. However, a deeper comparison with the Septuagint and the old Syriac version shows a variant reading that clarifies the exchange, likely resolving the supposed conflict. These variances testify that while minor corruptions could have entered the text through copying, they do not undermine the essential story or authorship.

Another example appears in Genesis 39:20–40:4, which references Joseph’s interactions with both “the keeper of the prison” and “the captain of the guard.” Textual variants in the Septuagint and Samaritan Pentateuch suggest that these titles could refer to the same individual or reflect a slight copying difference. Far from invalidating Moses’ authorship, such examples show how scribes may have handled slight textual complexities. The underlying historical narrative remains solid and free of irreconcilable contradictions.

Sacrificial Regulations and Central Worship

The sacrificial system, which is extensively described throughout Exodus, Leviticus, and Numbers, represents another point of contention for modern critics. They have argued that such an elaborate system must stem from a postexilic priestly school. Yet the Pentateuch itself frames these instructions in the wilderness period, where Jehovah established the terms of worship for the newly formed nation. Leviticus 1:1–2 presents clear directions from Jehovah to Moses on how the Israelites were to bring offerings. Exodus 23:19 and 34:26 mandate bringing sacrifices to the “house of Jehovah.” Before the temple was built, this was the tabernacle (Exodus 40:1–2; Joshua 18:1). These passages do not promote scattered shrines; they emphasize a singular location for official worship. The presence of altars in diverse places does not negate a central sanctuary; rather, it represents permissible lay offerings regulated under the Law covenant (Exodus 20:24). The instructions to maintain altars of simple construction guarded the people from adopting pagan altars.

Individual or lay sacrifices in daily life continued from patriarchal times (Genesis 22:13). Moreover, the system included national offerings, outlined in Numbers 28, that required priestly oversight and were performed at the official center of worship. Those who claim multiple conflicting views of sacrifice fail to recognize that such guidelines coexist naturally within the legislative framework. There is no chronological layering forcing a late date for these texts. Instead, these stipulations appear together, consistent with being formulated early and collectively—just as we would expect from Moses’ lifetime.

Why the Question of Authorship Matters

The authorship of these five books is not merely an academic question. Jesus and the New Testament writers repeatedly attribute the Law to Moses (Matthew 8:4; 19:7–8; Mark 12:26; John 5:46–47). Throughout the Gospels, Jesus treats the Pentateuch as originating from Moses. John 5:46–47 states: “If you believed Moses, you would believe me; for he wrote about me.” This certainty, expressed by Christ, underscores that the question of authorship is intrinsically tied to the authority of Scripture. If Moses’ role were a later invention, then Jesus’ references to Moses would be severely undermined. Since we hold that Jesus’ statements were always aligned with truth, the simplest explanation is that the Pentateuch’s main body truly comes from Moses.

Authorship by Moses ensures that the Old Testament narrative rests on eyewitness testimony for the Exodus and wilderness wandering. Deuteronomy 1:1 remarks that Moses “spoke to all Israel across the Jordan.” Such direct language deepens the conviction that the Pentateuch is not the product of speculation. Skeptical scholarship may hold that these texts were merely fables arranged over centuries, but the internal witness of Scripture, early Jewish tradition, and archaeological confirmations stand strong on the side of Moses as the legitimate source.

Literary Features Reflective of an Ancient Context

The writing style of the Pentateuch includes legal codes, historical narrative, genealogies, covenant stipulations, and detailed instructions for worship. These varied components align with what historians of the ancient Near East call “mixed-genre compositions,” typical of major cultural and religious documents in that era. The Code of Hammurabi similarly blends law with narrative and theological pronouncements. Egyptian instructions or annals sometimes integrate genealogical references with moral guidelines. The Pentateuch’s multifaceted structure is entirely consistent with an ancient composition method in which a primary author or overseer, namely Moses, prepared material suited to a nation’s cultural and religious identity.

The Book of Genesis, which predates Moses’ lifetime in its historical scope, could logically be an edited compilation of earlier patriarchal records. Yet Moses would have served as the inspired editor, unifying these narratives. The genealogical lists (Genesis 5:1–32; 11:10–32) and historical episodes concerning the patriarchs (Genesis 12–50) fit well into a cohesive account that seamlessly leads into Exodus’ description of a new generation of Israelites enslaved in Egypt (Exodus 1:8–14). Far from proving multiple authors over centuries, these ancient literary forms confirm that a single guiding hand brought them together with consistent purpose.

The Centrality of the Covenant

The heart of Exodus, Leviticus, and Numbers is the formation and establishment of Jehovah’s covenant with Israel. Exodus 24:3–8 describes how Moses took the words of Jehovah and “wrote down all the words of Jehovah” before reading them to the people. This covenant underscores the entire identity of Israel as a theocratic nation. If this covenant had not been compiled in Moses’ time, the fundamental premise of Israel’s national genesis would be rendered uncertain. The text repeatedly links the covenant terms to Moses, giving no space for a radically later authorship date.

Critics often charge that the centralization of worship in one place (Deuteronomy 12:5–14) could not have existed so early. Yet the Pentateuch explicitly states that Israel’s worship focus during the wilderness journey was the tabernacle. Following the settlement in Canaan, the tabernacle continued as the authorized center of worship until the temple was built by Solomon in the 10th century B.C.E. Nothing demands that Deuteronomy be a product of the time of King Josiah, as some critics assert. Its emphasis on undivided worship is consistent with earlier instructions in Exodus 25:8–9 for constructing the tabernacle, which would centralize worship for the entire camp of Israel.

The Respect of Prophets and Kings for Moses’ Writings

Israel’s historical books record that prophets and kings alike referenced the Law attributed to Moses. Joshua 1:7–8 makes Jehovah’s words plain: “Be careful to do all according to the law which Moses my servant commanded you.” This passage solidifies the immediate acceptance of the Pentateuch as Mosaic in authorship. During the reign of King Josiah (2 Kings 22:8–13), the scroll recovered in the temple was recognized as the “book of the law,” again associated with Moses. No biblical text suggests it was a recent invention. Rather, Josiah’s reaction reveals that the nation had neglected to follow an already authoritative document.

Ezra’s reestablishment of correct worship in the 5th century B.C.E. relied on “the Law of Moses” (Ezra 3:2; 7:6). Nehemiah 8:1–8 affirms that Ezra and the Levites read from “the book of the law” to the returned exiles, who understood that it traced back to Moses. Each instance cements the widely accepted belief that Moses laid the foundations of their national identity and religious practice. The frequency and consistency of these allusions across centuries demonstrate an unbroken line of testimony to Mosaic authorship.

Moses’ Qualifications and Role

Nothing in the biblical record indicates that Moses lacked the skills to compile such extensive narratives and legal codes. Exodus 4:10–16 mentions Moses initially resisting God’s call, citing limitations in speech. However, Jehovah assured him that divine empowerment would be given, and Aaron would assist him when necessary. This speaks neither to illiteracy nor inability to record God’s instructions. On the contrary, Exodus 17:14 points out that Jehovah commanded Moses explicitly to write certain historical events. These passages portray Moses as writing or dictating regularly, consistent with his station as Israel’s prophet and lawgiver.

Some critics have suggested that the Hebrew writing system could not have been sufficiently advanced in Moses’ day. Yet the abundant records from Egypt, Mesopotamia, and Canaan show writing to be firmly established centuries before the Exodus. Ancient Semitic alphabets, including early forms of Hebrew, were in circulation. Moses, raised in Pharaoh’s household, would have been more than capable of mastering these writing systems and perhaps adopting a Semitic script for Israel’s laws.

Later Editorial Notes in the Pentateuch

Acknowledging that a few additions may have been inserted after Moses’ death does not negate his authorship of the main content. Deuteronomy 34, which describes Moses’ passing, evidently reflects a completion by scribes who succeeded him. There may also be brief explanatory asides referring to place names recognized in a later era (Genesis 14:14). These clarifications do not suggest an entirely different authorship. Rather, they show that the text was reverently preserved and updated in minor ways to ensure clarity for later generations. It is very much, likely that Joshua would have included a couple of small items, which he too was an inspired author led along by the Holy Spirit.

No evidence shows a wholesale rewriting centuries after the wilderness sojourn. Instead, references to real events, genealogies, and consistent terminology confirm that the Pentateuch stands as a cohesive literary unit from an early epoch. Such editorial notes align with the norm of historical works in the ancient world, where scribes might append concluding remarks about a revered leader’s death. They are not contradictions but natural completions to the narrative.

Challenges from Modern Criticism

The modern era’s critical movement relied heavily on assumptions tied to an evolutionary view of religious development. Critics theorized that Israel’s religious practices began in rudimentary animism and progressed to sophisticated monotheism, culminating in an expanded priestly code. This premise underpins the notion that the priestly portions of the Pentateuch are late. However, the biblical record states from the outset that God revealed Himself as Jehovah, the true and living God, to Abraham (Genesis 12:1–3), centuries before Moses. Exodus 3:14–15 shows Jehovah further revealing Himself to Moses in a personal way. Nothing in the Scriptures indicates that the concept of monotheism was a late addition.

Archaeology also contradicts the evolutionary premise. From the earliest times, advanced religious concepts appear in records. The Code of Hammurabi, predating Moses, demonstrates a highly developed legal system that integrated religious elements, undermining the notion that a complex law code had to be a late invention. Similar developments surface in Nuzi, Mari, and other ancient sites. Instead of evolving from polytheism to monotheism, the Hebrew Scriptures portray humanity as moving away from an original knowledge of the true God after the fall (Genesis 3:1–24), requiring direct revelation to restore an accurate understanding. This perspective stands opposite to the theories of those who assume religious evolution.

Unity of Message and Purpose

One of the most powerful testimonies to the Pentateuch’s singular authorship is the thematic unity it projects: Jehovah’s sovereignty, Israel’s special role, and the need for obedience to divine commandments. The narratives consistently highlight Israel’s covenant relationship, culminating in blessings for obedience and consequences for disobedience (Leviticus 26:1–46; Deuteronomy 28:1–68). These teachings remain in direct continuity from Genesis’ presentation of God’s dealings with the patriarchs through the legislation at Sinai and the exhortations in Deuteronomy. The Pentateuch begins with creation in Genesis 1:1 and ends with Israel poised to enter the Promised Land in Deuteronomy 34, forming a complete framework for understanding the nation’s origin and vocation.

If this body of writing were fractured among multiple unrelated sources, such cohesive doctrinal and thematic flow would be exceedingly difficult to achieve. Critics sometimes interpret changes in grammar or style as proof of composite authorship, but variations of style can occur naturally when an author addresses different topics—historical narrative, legal code, or genealogies. Moses, in the wilderness context, presented more narrative in Exodus, more regulations in Leviticus, more historical record in Numbers, and a blend of sermon and law recap in Deuteronomy.

Consequences of Rejecting Moses’ Authorship

When voices insist the Pentateuch is merely the product of postexilic editors, they create a yawning gap between the events described and their documentation. This redefines the biblical account as a late invention with questionable historical integrity. It casts doubt on Joshua’s conquests, the entire monarchy period’s reliance on Mosaic Law, and the prophets’ appeals to that Law. It also calls into question Jesus’ repeated references to Moses as the author of the Torah. The integrity of the entire biblical narrative stands or falls on whether these earliest books reliably convey divine revelation and historical truth. Luke 24:27 affirms that Jesus began “with Moses” in explaining the things about Himself. Such a statement is hollow if Moses’ writings lack authenticity.

Faith is not divorced from reason, and a conservative examination of the biblical text is neither simplistic nor anti-intellectual. Rather, it is a reasoned stance, aligning textual evidence, archaeological records, and the consistent testimony of Jewish and Christian tradition. The wave of modern criticism often relies on hypothetical constructs that require more leaps of logic than the traditional understanding. By affirming Moses’ authorship, believers uphold the unity of Scripture and maintain a coherent view of God’s progressive revelation from the earliest recorded times to the fulfillment of divine promises in Jesus Christ.

The Everlasting Value of the Pentateuch

The first five books of the Bible continue to be foundational for understanding God’s character, humanity’s origins, and the significance of God’s covenant with His people. Genesis explains the creation of the world, the origin of sin, and the promise given to Abraham that “all the families of the earth shall be blessed” (Genesis 12:3). Exodus relates Israel’s deliverance from Egypt and the establishment of the covenant at Sinai, which not only defines Israel’s obligations to Jehovah, but also foreshadows greater deliverance in the divine purpose. Leviticus outlines purity, holiness, and the seriousness of sin. Numbers shows the realities of wandering and the cost of disobedience, while Deuteronomy renews the covenant in stirring final discourses attributed explicitly to Moses (Deuteronomy 1:1–5).

For those who revere Scripture, these books reveal how Jehovah was guiding the nation in holiness and devotion long before they settled in the Promised Land. They also demonstrate how Israel’s identity as a people was shaped by God’s direct involvement through Moses. The fact that these writings originated in the time of Moses, rather than emerging from a muddled postexilic process, instills confidence that the biblical text is anchored in real events.

Conclusion

The authorship by Moses of the Pentateuch stands on scriptural claims, historical tradition, and the confirmation of archaeological finds. Although modern critics have proposed alternate theories based on hypothetical reconstructions, these ideas often rest on uncertain assumptions or misunderstandings of the ancient textual record. The biblical narrative, from the patriarchs to the wilderness legislation, points naturally to Moses as the principal figure who, under divine commission, wrote down Israel’s foundational story and laws.

Jesus Christ Himself alluded repeatedly to the authority of Moses’ writings. This recognition by the Messiah and by the New Testament writers underscores the Pentateuch’s standing as an authoritative, integral body of Scripture with a long, verifiable history. When placed alongside the discovery of ancient codes and the textual consistency evidenced by the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Masoretic tradition, one can confidently say that the Pentateuch’s final form stems from the time of Israel’s sojourn in the wilderness, guided by Moses and preserved by the community of faith.

Moses’ pivotal role in shaping the faith and identity of Israel is inseparable from these five books. The Law covenant that defined Israel’s national life, the ceremonies that exemplified separation for divine service, and the moral instructions that pointed forward to a righteous standard for all mankind were written under his direction. The unwavering transmission of this foundational text testifies to God’s providential care in preserving His Word for future generations. The unity, consistency, and authenticity of the Pentateuch remain a steadfast witness to the faithfulness of Jehovah in revealing His will through Moses, as Scripture has long affirmed.

You May Also Enjoy

The Documentary Hypothesis—Defending Moses’ Authorship of the Pentateuch

About the Author

Online Guided Bible Study Courses

SCROLL THROUGH THE DIFFERENT CATEGORIES BELOW

BIBLE TRANSLATION AND TEXTUAL CRITICISM

BIBLICAL STUDIES / BIBLE BACKGROUND / HISTORY OF THE BIBLE/ INTERPRETATION

EARLY CHRISTIANITY

HISTORY OF CHRISTIANITY

CHRISTIAN APOLOGETIC EVANGELISM

TECHNOLOGY AND THE CHRISTIAN

CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY

CHRISTIAN DEVOTIONALS

CHRISTIAN FICTION